The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Bill O'Reilly vs. Rep. Anthony Weiner

There is. But its still funny to see Weiner dance around the question because he knows how much people who are too lazy, stupid, and/or arrogant to file tax returns properly dislike the IRS.

Fixed.

It's the same people who get all pissy about the Census because it asks demographic questions. "Oh my god, they're going to use anonymous information to single me out personally even though they already know those things from public record. Oh wait, you mean there's more than just me living in America? Unpossible!"

It's like the repo' man.

They are part of a civilized society, but we'd much rather try and disavow ourselves from the rules as much as possible.

Pfft. Don't you know real "civilized society" is when you have no government and everyone has a gun? An armed society is a polite society.
 
There is. But its still funny to see Weiner dance around the question because he knows how much Americans dislike the IRS.


He danced but people could see right through him.
 
I completely agree with O'Reilly on this one. I do find myself agreeing with O'Reilly about 35% of the time. This was definitely a time where I did as all he did was ask a question which Weiner would not answer.
 
Even O'Reilly gets one right occasionally. He's probably the least objectionable compared to Beck and Hannity, et. al., but that's not saying much.
 
He doesn't let up when he doesn't get an answer. That's unusual, but good.
 
I completely agree with O'Reilly on this one. I do find myself agreeing with O'Reilly about 35% of the time. This was definitely a time where I did as all he did was ask a question which Weiner would not answer.

Weiner answered it. It isn't a law enforcement problem so there is no "criminalization" but instead a fine.

It's kind of like asking Weiner how many times he's beaten his wife.
 
Weiner answered it. It isn't a law enforcement problem so there is no "criminalization" but instead a fine.

It's kind of like asking Weiner how many times he's beaten his wife.

Yeah, but O'Reilly wanted to know which government agency was responsible for catching the individual who chose not to purchase the insurance. Who was responsible for auditing this?

And Weiner did not answer. That was my problem with his answer. He wasn't directly answering the question, in my view.

He should have just said the Internal Revenue Service and that it would come up at tax time. It is what it is. No need to spin it, in my view.
 
Typical politician: he answered the questions he wanted to, not the questions that were asked. He dodged, ducked, and designed to deceive. It's like O'Reilly asked who will come to see you if the government learns you don't have a building permit for the pool you're digging in your back yard, and Weiner said, "We're not criminalizing swimming pools".

Match to O'Reilly.
 
Weiner is clearly a weenie

Glad he chickened out in running for mayor - he doesn't have the stones

Bill kept his cool (relatively) - he must've had a very good day :)
 
Weiner answered it. It isn't a law enforcement problem so there is no "criminalization" but instead a fine.

It's kind of like asking Weiner how many times he's beaten his wife.

No. Not remotely. Weiner did not answer the simple question of who was responsible for enforcing it, which everyone that has followed this bill (without the b.s. from the talking heads) knows is the IRS.
 
It's like the repo' man.

They are part of a civilized society, but we'd much rather try and disavow ourselves from *the rules as much as possible.

*The rules we didn't vote for, BTW. The ones we were specifically told were going to be completely different.
 
The man was obviously cornered. I was hoping O'Reilly would go all the way and really expose his ass. Such is life. One of the few times I've actually been with O'Reilly on something and he doesn't even go as far as he should, whereas he often goes much farther than he should.
 
The man was obviously cornered. I was hoping O'Reilly would go all the way and really expose his ass. Such is life. One of the few times I've actually been with O'Reilly on something and he doesn't even go as far as he should, whereas he often goes much farther than he should.

That's an interesting observation. I wonder if it wasn't the full moon that night? :p
 
Back
Top