- Joined
- Jan 15, 2006
- Posts
- 123,002
- Reaction score
- 4,576
- Points
- 113
The first sentence I quoted there seemed to me to imply that you actually said something along those lines to them. That's verbally attacking them. If I misunderstood and you merely think they can't be simultaneously Christian and racist or promiscuous and Christian, etcetera but didn't actually say as much to them, I'm sorry.
No problem. But to them, I might as well have said it -- by talking to blacks, skinny-dipping with Asians, saying "No, thank you" to an eighth beer, not taking a different gal into my tent every night when camping and leaving used condoms outside on the ground.... Merely being a Christian who doesn't do what they do is like an attack, to them.
Sad, really.
The only time I've actually commented directly on such behavior is when then get racist, promiscuous, drunk, or whatever in someone's face -- like the time one drunk guy was pawing at a chick who'd told him to go away, and he was like, You know that's what you're up here for, babe; I said something to the effect that maybe some people actually believe sex has something to do with love, he asked what that had to do with it, and I pointed to the cross he was wearing and said something about how the Bible said something like that.
But if they leave other people alone, I leave them alone, in terms of bringing up beliefs.
















.

