The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Some things to know about this forum:
    If you're new, please read the Posting Guidelines. Banned content is in "List of Content Never Allowed on JUB".
    The most important thing to know: images of persons under 18 years old are never allowed here. If you cannot verify that the person in the picture is 18 years or older, don't post it.

Brent Everett's WANTIN MORE

Joined
Sep 18, 2004
Posts
10
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Hey Guys!

I have just one simple question: Has ANYONE seen the movie WANTIN MORE from and with Brent Everett? Does it even really exist? Cause there's absolutely nothing about it in the internet...? No reviews or any other thing similarly...

Greetz Chris
 
im with ya on that one ive been wanting to get wantin more for ages but ive given up and it makes it harder that im from australia. last one i got was the super hot starting young 2 from brent, sizzlin scene with ben bradley!

cheers
 
Hey guys...

Brent Everett is on the big NO NO list. Can't post links or pics or topics of him. Just thought I'd give ya'll a big heads up.


but that vid looks fuckin hot..lol!oops!
 
Yes, of course. But anything more besides these two links? I mean, you can't buy it anywhere else? That's very suspicious... :(
 
i know fully that JUB has very good reasons for not allowing certain things to appear on their site but why not Brent Everett? is it because of his video with Corrigan?
 
If you look at the "List of Content Not Allowed on JUB" you will see there are a number of individials, websites, and studios on that list.

This is how it was explained to me by one of the JUB managers. The list falls into three categories ....

1. Those individuls banned by the JUB owners because they are under the age of 18 (e.g. Grey Speedos Boy) or websites which feature guys under the age of 18 (e.g. mike18.com, hmboys.com etc)

2. Straight people who do not wish to be associated with a gay website (i.e. Model Joseph Sayers and Actor Justin Berfield from 'Malcolm in the Middle') They have contacted JUB to ask that they be included on their Prohibited List.

3. Gay companies and individuals who own and operate pay websites and feel that their photos and clips freely posted on JUB will prevent people becoming members of their pay sites.

Bel Ami is one such company who comes into this category. Their argument is that if JUB posted pics and clips of their models, why would anyone want to pay money to become a member of the Bel Ami website. Pretty short sighted, but there you go! They're obviously in a minority as most other studios regard exposure on JUB in the forum of a few photos and preview clips as being good publicity.

Certain individuals have the same narrow view as Bel Ami and Brent Everett is one of them. He has his own website, http://www.brentxxx.com, which charges members $25.95 a month to have access to his photos and movie clips.

I was told that that Bel Ami Brent Everett and others have not only requested that JUB place their names on the list, but have actually threatened legal action if their wishes are not carried out.
 
well thats a good enough reason then! lol. thanks for explaining it to me.

much love - ITC
 
If you look at the "List of Content Not Allowed on JUB" you will see there are a number of individials, websites, and studios on that list.

This is how it was explained to me by one of the JUB managers. The list falls into three categories ....

1. Those individuls banned by the JUB owners because they are under the age of 18 (e.g. Grey Speedos Boy) or websites which feature guys under the age of 18 (e.g. mike18.com, hmboys.com etc)

2. Straight people who do not wish to be associated with a gay website (i.e. Model Joseph Sayers and Actor Justin Berfield from 'Malcolm in the Middle') They have contacted JUB to ask that they be included on their Prohibited List.

3. Gay companies and individuals who own and operate pay websites and feel that their photos and clips freely posted on JUB will prevent people becoming members of their pay sites.

Bel Ami is one such company who comes into this category. Their argument is that if JUB posted pics and clips of their models, why would anyone want to pay money to become a member of the Bel Ami website. Pretty short sighted, but there you go! They're obviously in a minority as most other studios regard exposure on JUB in the forum of a few photos and preview clips as being good publicity.

Certain individuals have the same narrow view as Bel Ami and Brent Everett is one of them. He has his own website, http://www.brentxxx.com, which charges members $25.95 a month to have access to his photos and movie clips.

I was told that that Bel Ami Brent Everett and others have not only requested that JUB place their names on the list, but have actually threatened legal action if their wishes are not carried out.

Thanks Excase. This is the best explanation I have read on this subject.

Because of the list of Content Not Allowed, there are many limitations on JUB.
Recently, the JUB moderators suddenly deleted a whole thread without notice. The thread discussed the famous ImageEvent albums of Cadeiii, JohnW, Timmo and Britboi. The thread didn't discuss a certain model or pornstar at all. I think it was deleted because some of the albums contained some prohibited pictures.
Are the JUB managers too cautious :confused:
 
I hardly think Brent Everett would have an objection to a link that directs back to his production company for a purchase of his DVD (which he produced and is distributing himself)
 
Yeah, I guess linking to pay sites is don't violate anything at all.

But wait... Mike18.com uses guys under 18? Are you sure? :S The page swears they are 18+. I have always wondered....
 
Thanks Excase. This is the best explanation I have read on this subject.

Because of the list of Content Not Allowed, there are many limitations on JUB.
Recently, the JUB moderators suddenly deleted a whole thread without notice. The thread discussed the famous ImageEvent albums of Cadeiii, JohnW, Timmo and Britboi. The thread didn't discuss a certain model or pornstar at all. I think it was deleted because some of the albums contained some prohibited pictures.
Are the JUB managers too cautious :confused:
Not sure what you mean, Bozzio, because there is not one, but TWO threads running at the moment which mention the ImageEvent galleries of those members:

http://www.justusboys.com/forum/showthread.php?t=175288

http://www.justusboys.com/forum/showthread.php?t=172968

It has been made quite clear by Moderators that copyright photos may NOT be posted on JUB servers. However such photos may be posted via external galleries i.e. Image Event. In this case, the individual owners of the Galleries (Caediii, JohnW, Timmo, Britboi etc) are responsible for the copyright and not JUB.

On the subject of Mike 18.com featuring under 18's, Ruxxx has proffered a photo of some kiddie displaying a pic of his passport to prove that he's 18.

That's fine, but what about the other 63 kids who appear on that web site?

"One swallow does not make a summer"

And one twink with a passport does not make a kosher 18+ website.

There are others there who will need a few more summers yet, before they see 18!
 
Thanks PodPond, maybe the thread was accidentally deleted.
I'm sure it was deleted because I made one post in this thread.
Let's see how long the two remaining threads will last.
 
Back
Top