The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Bristol Palin and fiance split

And yet you as well as Republicans refuse to understand the hypocrisy of the situation.

Sarah Palin was touting how to teach children, and the only course for sex ed should be abstinence only. She spouted "family values". Her child Bristol was 17 at the time of getting knocked up, and a legal charge of Sarah & her husband. It's pretty retarded to think that you can hold up your views on family values and children's education programs, when you very own children can't live up to the shit you spew.

Really? I could give a shit less about Palin AND her family. The only reason I ever defended her is because she didn't deserve as MUCH bashing as she received. Thanks for putting my thoughts in my head for me ;)
 
if ure gonna talk about hypocrisy, talk about obama and his earmarks. and gewhite, i wear boxer briefs ty very much :D
 
Earmarks are such a red herring. Many of them are worthwhile and, if you go rid of all of them, you wouldn't change more than 2% of the budget and the projects that needed to be funded would still need to be funded. Earmarks, blackberries, teleprompters...all nonsense from folk who have nothing positive to contribute.

As for Bristol and Levi, Palin painted herself as an anti-gay no sex before marriage family values candidate so, obviously, it's of interest if even her own daughter can't live up to Palin's moral requirements and says as much.

Palin also used Bristol and Levi as props when she accepted her nomination so the fact that they can't get it together after having a child together even for a year or so just shows you how phony that image was.

Like it or not, it's great fodder for the Dems so they're going to use it. As funny as it would be, you have to be delusional to want to see the Palin family Gerry Springer show in the White House.
 
You mean like when you were saying to another JUBer that had stayed up late:

"i would ask "were u out with al gore's kid?" but that would be tacky"

after Albert Gore III got his DUI?

i will take ur word for it that i "said" that

and if i did, i was kidding

what was the topic of the thread molten ? and what was the context?

why don't u provide the link - please

search away

glad to keep u busy :rolleyes:
 
Especially unfortunate for the child who will grow up with his parents apart.

Uh, if they split on decent terms and are able to treat each other decently or even better be friends, then I think the child will and both of them will end up better than being forced in an unhappy marriage just to provide some form of credibility to Sarah Palin's viewpoints.

The need for sex education and easy access to contraception seems such an obvious no brainer.

Very true if only people like Sarah Palin will realize this.
 
The right-wingers are slackin'. I've been observing them for some time so I'll give it a try....

ahem....

If Obama had put more funds for relationship counseling in the stimulus package and passed it sooner, this could've been avoided.

Breaking campaign promises as usual, yet and still the kool-aid drinkers continue to march in line. They won't be as happy when their relationship fails and they realize Obama isnt' going to pay for the couple's therapy.


How'd I do?
 
Uh, if they split on decent terms and are able to treat each other decently or even better be friends, then I think the child will and both of them will end up better than being forced in an unhappy marriage just to provide some form of credibility to Sarah Palin's viewpoints.


I never suggested they should be forced into an unhappy marriage.

Their split, none the less, is unfortunate and sad.

When couples that young split, with a baby, it's almost never on decent terms treating each other decently or as friends, as you fantasize for them. Not that your fantasy isn't lovely, but it isn't the way it usually goes. Even mature couples usually have a rough time of it. Dreams and expectations are disappointed, there's misunderstanding, hurt and anger. Circumstances like that tend to change us, and not in happy ways. And, IMO, from what I've seen of the two families, they don't seem to have good conflict resolution skills (the Palins seem controlling with a taste for revenge, and Levi's mother apparently has drug issues); it's a pretty good bet that Bristol and Levi will end up quarreling through their parenting with their families egging them on, and another child will grow up damaged.
 
[Quoted post: Removed by Moderator]


Chance is right.

Taking shots at Palin through her daughter is mean and cynical.

If anyone attacked Obama through potshots at his daughters ... how would you feel about that?

Chance is right; he's not the one who's an asshole in this.
 
You're missing the point entirely.

When Palin's daughter was trotted out on stage at the RNC as a model of GOP "family values," she became fair game.

Chance is wrong.

And so are you.


The Palin children were not trotted on stage as models of GOP family values, they were brought on stage for the reason all children of politicians and other famous people are -- to endear the famous adults to the audience, to soften the feelings of those watching, for the awww factor, the likeability factor.

The Obamas have trotted out their daughters just like the Palins and Bushes did. Republicans went after Chelsea Clinton, and Democrats went afte the Bush daughters. It's cheesy and mean, and a cheap shot to use teenagers to attack their parents or something their parents stand for. Teenagers do stupid things and it's tough being a teen, and it's meanspirited going after them when their only real crime is being born to ambitious famous parents and being used by them for publicity.

You are wrong, and your inability to see it only shows how deep that mean streak is.
 
Earmarks are such a red herring. Many of them are worthwhile and, if you go rid of all of them, you wouldn't change more than 2% of the budget and the projects that needed to be funded would still need to be funded. Earmarks, blackberries, teleprompters...all nonsense from folk who have nothing positive to contribute.

As for Bristol and Levi, Palin painted herself as an anti-gay no sex before marriage family values candidate so, obviously, it's of interest if even her own daughter can't live up to Palin's moral requirements and says as much.

Palin also used Bristol and Levi as props when she accepted her nomination so the fact that they can't get it together after having a child together even for a year or so just shows you how phony that image was.

Like it or not, it's great fodder for the Dems so they're going to use it. As funny as it would be, you have to be delusional to want to see the Palin family Gerry Springer show in the White House.

What he said! ^^^

Hasn't anyone noticed no Dem on here made issue about McCain leaving his first wife for Cindy? McCain's first wife was disfigured in an accident and waited for John for years while he was POW?

Notice how he doesn't do that holier-than-thou routine like Palin?

Capische?
 
Yes. Lynn is heavily involved with politics and will be running for VP in 4 years. Bullshit that your post was just a joke. Once again, your crap is showing. :rolleyes: :badgrin:

have a lovely day ;)
 
And yet you as well as Republicans refuse to understand the hypocrisy of the situation.

Sarah Palin was touting how to teach children, and the only course for sex ed should be abstinence only. She spouted "family values". Her child Bristol was 17 at the time of getting knocked up, and a legal charge of Sarah & her husband. It's pretty retarded to think that you can hold up your views on family values and children's education programs, when you very own children can't live up to the shit you spew.

This is taking things too far. The daughter shouldn't be bashed for the stupidity of the mother, but her own stupidity. Overall Families should be kept OUT of politics whenever possible.

And stop with the holier then thou bullshit... everyone.... it's giving me a migraine. ](*,) ](*,) ](*,)
 
The Palin children were not trotted on stage as models of GOP family values, they were brought on stage for the reason all children of politicians and other famous people are -- to endear the famous adults to the audience, to soften the feelings of those watching, for the awww factor, the likeability factor.

The Obamas have trotted out their daughters just like the Palins and Bushes did. Republicans went after Chelsea Clinton, and Democrats went afte the Bush daughters. It's cheesy and mean, and a cheap shot to use teenagers to attack their parents or something their parents stand for. Teenagers do stupid things and it's tough being a teen, and it's meanspirited going after them when their only real crime is being born to ambitious famous parents and being used by them for publicity.

You are wrong, and your inability to see it only shows how deep that mean streak is.


Nick - as a "student of human nature" ........... u should know that

ur points are wasted here

ur points are clear - they are valid - they are just

and therefore remain ........... wasted

but I do appreciate the sentiment
 
Back
Top