Stardreamer
auribus teneo lupum
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2010
- Posts
- 5,044
- Reaction score
- 6
- Points
- 38
- Location
- Over the Hedge and Under the Hill
I'm curious to know in what way so-called "regressive liberalism", as I've always heard the term used, is similar to the alt-right.
Regressive liberalism is the term conservatives use against liberals whenever they squawk about Muslims "invading" the US or when advocating laws banning Sharia courts. Basically, the argument goes that while liberals advocate for the rights of women and gays, they refuse to fight for them when threatened by Muslims. It's an argument that has virtually zero basis in reality. Oh, and those "Sharia courts" are no real different then Roman Catholic Canon Law courts that annul marriages which decides nothing more then whether you can be married in a Catholic Church again. Conservatives swear though, that somehow these Sharia courts are "mandatory" for Muslim women while presenting no proof for that of course.
So in what way did the video make the comparison?
I need to look at this some more I think. The way the term was being used seems to be aimed at such things as social justice warriors, something called third wave feminism and PC movements on campuses. In that, this Chris Ray Gun person whose video I saw today sounds a lot like some of the viewpoints I hear associated with alt.right as far as speech goes and anti-PC attitudes. Which is really disturbing to me since while I find most of what is being said about the alt.right frightening, I am very much a free speech advocate and have always found the very idea of PC an anathema so I'm trying to sort this all out in my world view.



















