CNN: Jill Stein reaches 7% Nationally

[opinterph]

you have failed to convince me of anything sir.

I wish we lived in the day when you could challenge a person to a duel. Now that would be pretty good.

 

[MystikWizard]

I wish we lived in the day when you could challenge a person to a duel. Now that would be pretty good.

Zig Zag Zell.

 

[TX-Beau]

incredibly amateur analysis of the situation. the republicans control 2.5 branches of government, but somehow listening to the "extremists" within the republican party, the "True believers" is somehow NOT responsible for republicans electoral success? debating these issues with democrats, conservatives, liberals and republicans on here for 12 years now and you may learn a thing or two.

you have failed to convince me of anything sir.

Oh Sugarpie, all I care about with regards to you is amusement.

 

[offthewall14420]

incredibly amateur analysis of the situation. the republicans control 2.5 branches of government, but somehow listening to the "extremists" within the republican party, the "True believers" is somehow NOT responsible for republicans electoral success? debating these issues with democrats, conservatives, liberals and republicans on here for 12 years now and you may learn a thing or two.

you have failed to convince me of anything sir.

Having a conversation with you is like arguing with a dining room table.

 

[Kabluey]

but you only see elections as binary choices? interesting yet cowardly rationale for attacking progressive ideas.

Perot or Nader?

You realise you lost all progressive credibility here with some of those not-so-progressive statements, don't you? Plus, you've been hinting at support for Trump, of all things.

 

[rareboy]

I can. And I have faith that some judges would be willing to hold out until the end of Trump's first term to limit the damage.

This is purely idiotic.

The next Supreme Court appointment will define the court.

There is sure to be another in the next four years.

There is no such thing as 'The Court Holding Out'

You apparently have no clue as to how the third branch of your federal government works.

 

[MystikWizard]

This is purely idiotic.

The next Supreme Court appointment will define the court.

There is sure to be another in the next four years.

There is no such thing as 'The Court Holding Out'

You apparently have no clue as to how the third branch of your federal government works.

No, you simply have a reading comprehension problem nobody else has and would have been more wise of you to clarify with me before making such accusations.

Yes, a conservative justice would be picked from a Trump presidency, putting us right back where we started with Scalia.

However, regarding any other Liberal justices looking to retire in the next 4 years, I believe the damage would be limited from that being they would hold out until the next President to prevent Trump from nominating their replacements.

It's been a couple years but I do recall bickering with you, someone who lives in Canada, but is so concerned about American politics because you think it affects Canadians more than it really does.

 

[rareboy]

You mean like Scalia held on.

Unfortunately....the person that the emotional and irrational American voters pick often have catastrophic consequences for Canadians and others around the world.

We're all still suffering the consequences of Ralph Nader's feckless fans giving the planet George Bush and his cabal.

So yeah.

We're interested.

I also recall that you have often come down on the politically conservative side of arguments over the years.

So your new romance with Bernie doesn't convince us or even ring the least bit true.

 

[MystikWizard]

You mean like Scalia held on.

Unfortunately....the person that the emotional and irrational American voters pick often have catastrophic consequences for Canadians and others around the world.

We're all still suffering the consequences of Ralph Nader's feckless fans giving the planet George Bush and his cabal.

So yeah.

We're interested.

I also recall that you have often come down on the politically conservative side of arguments over the years.

So your new romance with Bernie doesn't convince us or even ring the least bit true.

Fully admit I was a Republican until 2007 until I went through a series of life changing events in my own personal situation that resulted in me re-evaluating my belief system and leaving the Party at that time. Voted for Obama twice and have been a Democrat since then. I think 9 years of posts should count for something.

 

[Kabluey]

Fully admit I was a Republican until 2007 until I went through a series of life changing events in my own personal situation that resulted in me re-evaluating my belief system and leaving the Party at that time. Voted for Obama twice and have been a Democrat since then. I think 9 years of posts should count for something.

Not to put too fine a point on it, but when you change your position on something, it's revaluation, but when Clinton does, it's lying.
To me that seems a double standard.

 

[MystikWizard]

Not to put too fine a point on it, but when you change your position on something, it's revaluation, but when Clinton does, it's lying.
To me that seems a double standard.

I changed my Party once in 2007. How many times has Clinton changed her positions on issues over the years?

 

[rareboy]

Fully admit I was a Republican until 2007 until I went through a series of life changing events in my own personal situation that resulted in me re-evaluating my belief system and leaving the Party at that time. Voted for Obama twice and have been a Democrat since then. I think 9 years of posts should count for something.

Bullshit.

I've read lots of your posts since 2007.

I just wish that the Trumpeters would just own your shit instead of skulking in the bushes and lobbing it at Hillary.

 

[lambdaboy]

Immediately after Sanders democratic campaign ended, Jill Steins support from voters TRIPLED to 7% in a CNN poll.

The Shillary people, the real spoilers in this race, who would sell their grandma if it meant convincing voters that Hillarys reckless foreign policy decisions havent in the SMALLEST bit caused a spike in terror attacks across the western world, better be prepared to get the long coming slap of cold water on their feckless campaign.

A mere 1% could influence a three or four way race, now that Americans are so tired of being blackmailed into supporting one candidate to oppose another, they have realized you can support someone you believe in.

I extend my middle finger to Clinton land and offer them the same warm glass of piss they would have everyone drink that refuses to go along with Crooked Hillary.

Vote for TRUMP your choice if you want to live in his world get a log cabin closet!

 

[MystikWizard]

Bullshit.

I've read lots of your posts since 2007.

I just wish that the Trumpeters would just own your shit instead of skulking in the bushes and lobbing it at Hillary.

Yes ... all of my posts supporting Obama over the years and supporting Sanders this entire Primary season was an all act to hide my real support for Trump, rareboy. (sarcasm).

Even my donations to the Sanders campaign was all part of this supposed ruse.

You are absolutely desperate and pathetic.

 

[rareboy]

What is desperate and pathetic is your obsessive hatred for Hillary and your contempt for the people supporting her.

You come off about as unhinged as Evanrick.

 

[Kabluey]

I changed my Party once in 2007. How many times has Clinton changed her positions on issues over the years?

I've changed my position on issues over the years as the social, economic and political climate has changed.
Does that make me a liar now?

 

[MystikWizard]

I've changed my position on issues over the years as the social, economic and political climate has changed.
Does that make me a liar now?

Not at all. When you become notorious for it and doing so when it is politically expedient, that's when you begin to lose integrity.

 

[Kabluey]

Not at all. When you become notorious for it and doing so when it is politically expedient, that's when you begin to lose integrity.

Why is it 'notorious'? Amongst her critics, every action appears to be notorious.

 

[Kulindahr]

I wish we lived in the day when you could challenge a person to a duel. Now that would be pretty good.

It would be pretty good if we could challenge congresscritters to duels. Think of it as term limits.