Dems cancel Nevada Pres Debate on Fox

[iman]

I have not understood why Democrats ever appear on FOX. FOX is not a news organization, they do not adhere to any journalistic ethic and have repeatedly resorted to outright lies when it suits their purpose. Their purpose being to manipulate the weak minded and uninformed and pander to the true believers like the author of this thread.

 

[JayHawk]

And for those of you wondering about the horrible name I called Chance...the one that resulted in the infraction...you've already read it. It's in the post directly above.

Now...I'll leave it to you and the moderators to determine if "flicker face" is on a par with "pathetic lame ridicuous hypocrites." Certainly, all decent JUBbers will insist that Chance be treated in a manner that is "fair and balanced." (And yes, I know that's FOX News' slogan, but hey...they're not using it, so I figure it's fair game.)

Wait,as previously demonstrated he is allowed to call democrats anything he wants, that is fair game. It is not a crime or infraction to then identify you with dems.

Don't be a hypocrit (translated- democrat)

All you children need a tissue

 

[OtterJoq]

Take the blinders off and read post #13 again, mazda.

That's a personal attack, similar to the one you just made.

You're right...he can say whatever he wants.

But he needs to understand that the rules should be applied fairly.

(Not that "fairness" is a concept 'Pugs would understand..)

By the way...I've got an extra "e" if you'd like to borrow it in order to spell "hypocrite" correctly.

 

[letme]

Otter just what the hell are you saying that Chance made a personal attack in post #13 ?
He never named you or ANYBODY. He made a general comment about closed minded people.

You must only watch CNN,which must be for short for "Chance k(N)nows Nothing " in your humble opinion . Didya see Brian Williams on NBC "reporting" from Iraq this week ? Talk about being bias in the media !!!!!!!!!!!!!

BTW I get an A for no miss-spelled words !

 

[JayHawk]

Take the blinders off and read post #13 again, mazda.

That's a personal attack, similar to the one you just made.

You're right...he can say whatever he wants.

But he needs to understand that the rules should be applied fairly.

(Not that "fairness" is a concept 'Pugs would understand..)

By the way...I've got an extra "e" if you'd like to borrow it in order to spell "hypocrite" correctly.

You still need a tissue. In the mass depraved attacks on "PUGS" you don't have anything to say, just savant nodding. Try something original. And yes Vana I would like to buy a vowel.

Unfortunately thats what makes this forum so not worth much time. It is all the same whines and bitches, repeated ad-nauseum. I would love to see half the folks here entertain having a viewpoint not handed to them. oh shit but that takes thought, sorry, how callous of me. I forgot dems need a hand(-out) with things.

 

[chance1]

Take the blinders off and read post #13 again, mazda.

That's a personal attack, similar to the one you just made.

You're right...he can say whatever he wants.

But he needs to understand that the rules should be applied fairly.

(Not that "fairness" is a concept 'Pugs would understand..)

By the way...I've got an extra "e" if you'd like to borrow it in order to spell "hypocrite" correctly.

waaaaaaaaaa

poor Otter

I think I was referrring to the Dems - as I did previously

but whatever

get out the crying towel

 

[OtterJoq]

You knew exactly what you were doing in post # 13, chance.

The fact that you're avoiding responsibility for it now only cements the impression most of the rest of us here have of you.

Truly, I understand your anger and bitterness...how horrible it must be to open the paper or turn on the news every day and find that more of your heroes have fallen from grace...

But that's no reason to take it out on the rest of us.

I'd love to hear more about why you were banned earlier; I'll bet it's a deliciously pathetic story.

And as far as having things handed them, boi, let's talk about your "boi" Bush having the Oval Office handed to him by daddy's friends. It ain't the Dems who set the benchmark for special treatment, ZoomZoom.

 

[chance1]

You knew exactly what you were doing in post # 13, chance.

The fact that you're avoiding responsibility for it now only cements the impression most of the rest of us here have of you.

Truly, I understand your anger and bitterness...how horrible it must be to open the paper or turn on the news every day and find that more of your heroes have fallen from grace...

But that's no reason to take it out on the rest of us.

I'd love to hear more about why you were banned earlier; I'll bet it's a deliciously pathetic story.

And as far as having things handed them, boi, let's talk about your "boi" Bush having the Oval Office handed to him by daddy's friends. It ain't the Dems who set the benchmark for special treatment, ZoomZoom.

"most of us" - not sure you speak for many

I think avoiding talking about the truth is unfortunate. For Edwards to play that card is weak - this is a guy who wants to be President? if he's elected he'll refuse to answer questions from a Fox News correspondent? really?
and u support that?

you really do digress far too often - I think ur posts above - hot and heavy and so many suggest u are the one that is "angry"

your getting harder and harder to understand otter

 

[White Eagle]

Chance
your post #13 I take as a personal attack on me as it was in answer to my post #12. That's the way I see it and it doesn't really surprise me. You owe a couple of appologies. To me and to Otter as I see in your last you called him a liar.

I think avoiding talking about the truth is unfortunate.

You really need to clarify what you mean if that is not what you are saying.
And if Edwards becomes the president I would hope he refuses questions from the nonnews Fox. Yes I would support that.

 

[Andreus]

it wont matter

it is obvious to all of us he was out of line, but not only will he never admit it, but nothing will be done to reign his out of control behavior in.

 

[chance1]

Chance
your post #13 I take as a personal attack on me as it was in answer to my post #12. That's the way I see it and it doesn't really surprise me. You owe a couple of appologies. To me and to Otter as I see in your last you called him a liar. You really need to clarify what you mean if that is not what you are saying.
And if Edwards becomes the president I would hope he refuses questions from the nonnews Fox. Yes I would support that.

my response was not to you fuckbait

to all - because the idea of not going on a particular network is pathetic, lame and hypocritical

that if mccain or rudy or whomever can go on one of the multitude of extreme liberal, liberal and/or liberal leaning nets - then good old country bizillionaire Edwards can go on Fox

What is hypocritical is that Fox is this/that - they are ONE network

So many on the other side

as for Edwards being President and refusing to answer Fox correspondent reporters questions - and u support that? that speaks to you

 

[NW007]

I would suggest Peggy Noonan's column in the March 10/11 2007 edition of the Wall Street Journal. A good column about how each wing of the major parties views the other. When the conservatives look at Bill Maher "they were delighted he revealed what they believe is at the heart of modern liberalism which is hate." When the liberals look at Ann Coulter "They were delighted she has revealed what they believe is at the heart of modern conservatism, which is hate."

This thread is quickly going down the path of what Peggy Noonan is talking about in her column. I look forward to when we will get to the issues.

Take a look at her column.(If I knew how to technically copy and paste the article to this post I would. Maybe somebody can send me a private message how to do that)

 

[NW007]

Maybe the posters who can't stand Fox, should stop watching it and you wouldn't get so riled up. I know alot of the threads would be shorter if we didn't have to listen to the anti Fox posts.

I don't see the moderates or conservatives on this sight whining constantly about MSNBC, NBC, or CBS, New York Times, LA Times, or Washington Post as much as the anti-Fox posters do. (these news organizations are just accepted as being known to have strong liberal biases. It doesn't mean I don't listen or read them, its just I don't constantly rant about them, as there wouldn't be enough time in the day. )

 

[Andreus]

I don't see the moderates or conservatives on this sight whining constantly .....quote]

you obvoiusly arent reading the same threads that the rest of us are

how about this?

if people stop posting that trash as if its real news we wont have to comment on it

 

[chance1]

Maybe the posters who can't stand Fox, should stop watching it and you wouldn't get so riled up. I know alot of the threads would be shorter if we didn't have to listen to the anti Fox posts.

I don't see the moderates or conservatives on this sight whining constantly about MSNBC, NBC, or CBS, New York Times, LA Times, or Washington Post as much as the anti-Fox posters do. (these news organizations are just accepted as being known to have strong liberal biases. It doesn't mean I don't listen or read them, its just I don't constantly rant about them, as there wouldn't be enough time in the day. )

Fox is the devil - that's the ticket

They are evil

It's just that simple

They are 1 network

On the liberal side is oh so many networks - but that's ok

Fox is the devil

It is just too funny

 

[White Eagle]

I wouldn't call fox the devil or evil, they are liars as well as bigoted.

You started this thread with an article about Edwards dropping out of the debate due to the "joke" that was said. He didn't say they were a non network. I said that along with Otter and others have the same opinion.

 

[NW007]

I don't see the moderates or conservatives on this sight whining constantly .....quote]

you obvoiusly arent reading the same threads that the rest of us are

how about this?

if people stop posting that trash as if its real news we wont have to comment on it

That would be a good idea however I am afraid that both sides of the political aisle including members on this site generally consider the otherside's news sources as trash. If we would all agree that all news sources have their biases and leave it at that, we could get on with discussing the subjects at hand. However, we don't live in a utopia; so it won't happen

 

[NW007]

I don't see the moderates or conservatives on this sight whining constantly .....quote]

you obvoiusly arent reading the same threads that the rest of us are

how about this?

if people stop posting that trash as if its real news we wont have to comment on it

Andreus:
PLEASE, if you are going to quote me; quote the entire post #36. Otherwise, you are taking my points out of context.

Thanks

 

[Andreus]

i quote what i am speaking to

thanks for your opinion on what i should do though

after considering it, i have elected to do something different

 

[Andreus]

I wouldn't call fox the devil or evil, they are liars as well as bigoted.

You started this thread with an article about Edwards dropping out of the debate due to the "joke" that was said. He didn't say they were a non network. I said that along with Otter and others have the same opinion.

everyone IN the media KNOWS they are biased, as do they themselves

they are not really a news outlet, they are entertainment for people of a certain ... mentality