The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

Do White guys like asian guys? why and why not?

Practice the Golden Rule : DO UNTO OTHERS AS YOU WOULD HAVE THEM DO UNTO YOU.
 
I find Asians sexually attractive but I do have an issue with their personality types. Too many of times I have come across the same personality type in Asian guys here--very passive, shy, indecisive and downright awkward in bed. Having sex was like trying to fuck your first high school hormonal girlfriend. So I'm just hesitant with Asian guys though I do see a lot of pretty ones around. I'd think dating one would be even more difficult. I gather it all has to do with cultural differences they grow up in.
 
What ???? Can't Talk????

I can talk. I can also spell and punctuate, and have a life outside of trolling on a website.

Can you shut the fuck up? That's the only rabbit trick I'd like to see from you right now.
 
I find Asians sexually attractive but I do have an issue with their personality types. Too many of times I have come across the same personality type in Asian guys here--very passive, shy, indecisive and downright awkward in bed. Having sex was like trying to fuck your first high school hormonal girlfriend. So I'm just hesitant with Asian guys though I do see a lot of pretty ones around. I'd think dating one would be even more difficult. I gather it all has to do with cultural differences they grow up in.

You are so Damn Right Mister.
 
I can talk. I can also spell and punctuate, and have a life outside of trolling on a website.

Can you shut the fuck up? That's the only rabbit trick I'd like to see from you right now.

Sorry, Cant Talk right Now Cuz I already am in Bed with Ur Mum. Can We talk about it later. Don't bother me. Im enjoying myself PUNK
 
I can talk. I can also spell and punctuate, and have a life outside of trolling on a website.

Can you shut the fuck up? That's the only rabbit trick I'd like to see from you right now.

Can you tell me What LIFE do you have? LOW LIFE??? Picking on People??? Im here to TEACH yu Manners Punk.
 
avatar465826_1.gif


is that real you? If that so, Im not surprised :rolleyes:

You can be pretentious like any other good looker in every race
 
sorry cos I'm asian and my bf is white. we've been together for awhile. I just suddenly thought about relationships between caucasian and asian and I wonder if there is any difference between white-asian and white-white or asian-asian. Or maybe my question is just dumb and ridiculous sorry everyone :|

You answered your own question. Clearly your white bf likes your Asian self. And there would be others that don't share the feelings. Blanket statements such as these will never hold up 100%.
 
Asian men are the most neotonized of all males among humans typified by slow aging, sparse body and facial hair, and short penile length and girth.
Yes, let's talk about people like animals, while further emphasizing harmful stereotypes about us being less manly and less sexual.
 
I speak in scientific terms, as always.

SCIENCE!

Gould also argued "that the whole enterprise of ranking groups by degree of neoteny is fundamentally unjustified" (Gould, 1996, pg. 150).

Stephen Jay Gould objected to the ranking of races as more or less neotenous. But Gould argued that if one used the terms set forth by 1920s proponents of racial neoteny, "Asians" are "clearly" the most neotenized human race.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoteny
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Jay_Gould

Oh yeah, let's classifying people by the stadards of the friggin' 1920es. HAIL SCIENCE!

Dr. George W. Gill, professor of anthropology at the University of Wyoming and Dennis O'Neil professor of anthropology at Palomar College, said that "Mongoloid" concept originated with a now disputed typological method of racial classification.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongoloid_race#Criticism

Scientists consider biological essentialism obsolete, and generally discourage racial explanations for collective differentiation in both physical and behavioral traits.

Even though there is a broad scientific agreement that essentialist and typological conceptualizations of race are untenable, scientists around the world continue to conceptualize race in widely differing ways, some of which have essentialist implications. While some researchers sometimes use the concept of race to make distinctions among fuzzy sets of traits, others in the scientific community suggest that the idea of race often is used in a naive or simplistic way, and argue that, among humans, race has no taxonomic significance by pointing out that all living humans belong to the same species.

(...)

In the early 20th century, many anthropologists accepted and taught the belief that biologically distinct races were isomorphic with distinct linguistic, cultural, and social groups, while popularly applying that belief to the field of eugenics, in conjunction with a practice that is now called scientific racism. After the Nazi eugenics program, racial essentialism lost widespread popularity. Race anthropologists were pressured to acknowledge findings coming from studies of culture and population genetics, and to revise their conclusions about the sources of phenotypic variation. A significant number of modern anthropologists and biologists in the West came to view race as an invalid genetic or biological designation.

(...)

On the other hand in practice subspecies are often defined by easily observable physical appearance, but there is not necessarily any evolutionary significance to these observed differences, so this form of classification has become less acceptable to evolutionary biologists. Likewise this typological approach to race is generally regarded as discredited by biologists and anthropologists.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_(human_classification)
 
And all that boils down to, we're in sociology oversensitive to racial classifications so we can't even discuss evolution, which is bogus. There is some evolutionary pressure obviously which has made Mediterranean men hairier than Asian men, a neotonizing process from our collective H. Ergaster origins. I don't care to divulge into sociology in order to arrive at a conclusion that is evolutionary. Try as you will to turn a blind eye to racial differentiation. It still exists. Both liberal and conservative ideology trends to erase the facts of science.
 
Back
Top