The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Explaining the Narcissistic Rage of the Left

That was a lazy bait-and-switch. Obama did not behead anyone in Medina. Either comment on how Snopes included context for Obama's quote (in the link you gave) and how it doesn't support your position or toss it up as a bad job n'go spin some other bit of drek.

He said what he said, and we are entitled to slander the prophet of Islsm, whether Hussein likes it or not.
 
We have a Constitutional right to slander the prophet of Islam. He, for instance, beheaded the 600 Jews of of Medina.

You're invited to participate in the defence of the United States when Islamic extremists choose to respond to your insults.

I am certain that you would be prepared to die in defence of your beliefs, and for your country....after provoking so many Islamic imbeciles into using violence against your fellow citizens.

I prefer diplomacy knowing that provoking people does not resolve differences between them.

I shall not be sending you flowers.
 
We have a Constitutional right to slander the prophet of Islam. He, for instance, beheaded the 600 Jews of of Medina.

Which, as mentioned above, has nothing whatsoever to do with your claim. Nothing. Nada. Zilch.

Nobody anywhere said anything about Constitutional rights.

And, as mentioned, your post was simply baiting because you don't read what you post and then try to bullshit your way out of it when you are caught, which you were... again.
 
You're invited to participate in the defence of the United States when Islamic extremists choose to respond to your insults.

I am certain that you would be prepared to die in defence of your beliefs, and for your country....after provoking so many Islamic imbeciles into using violence against your fellow citizens.

I prefer diplomacy knowing that provoking people does not resolve differences between them.

I shall not be sending you flowers.

It is more serious than that. The problem is that while the West has learned to tolerate religions and to accept their differences without personal acrimony, Muslims have been taught to be intolerant--any criticism of Mohamud is likely to provoke a call fo jihad and death. That is the cause of the present turmoil. BUT it it is still more important than that. Christianity is rapidly retreating and becoming more and more irrelevant. Who believes in hell anymore? But it is confronted with the militant and intolerant Islam.if Muslims cannot learn to doubt as we do, intolerant Islam is likely to dominate a new dark age.
 
He said what he said, and we are entitled to slander the prophet of Islsm, whether Hussein likes it or not.

Let me give you an example of the dangers of taking things out of context.

During our last election, former prime minister Stephen Harper anchored his campaign on a few small things, and the one that virtually killed his re-election was a comment once made by now prime minister Justin Trudeau: "the budget will balance itself."

I left the 't' in 'the' as minor case because, during the campaign TV commercials, it was obvious that something had been edited out. It was supposed to imply that Trudeau didn't have a clue how to run a government. However, when the context is added back in, it says something completely different: "The commitment needs to be a commitment to grow the economy and the budget will balance itself."

If you bothered to read your own article that you posted, you would see that he didn't say what you are saying he said.

Then again, you probably wouldn't because you will read ONLY what you want to read and believe ONLY what you want to believe.
 
Most of the soldiers fighting against Islamic States armies, are Muslim....they represent the majority of victims, along with many Muslim civilians.

Thank fully the winds of change are now blowing against Islamic States with the likelihood that they will soon be eliminated.

Do please distinguish between Islam, and those who masquerade as Muslims while murdering innocent people.
 





Where is your starting point?​

I don't understand your question. We hated Obama's socialism, not the man.
Freedom of speech includes the right to criticize or slander long dead evil doers. Christianity is a much weaker religion than it once was. If you don't believe in punishment, it is largely irrelevant. Obama's promotion of Islam verbally and by immigration, endangers our western civilization.
 
I don't understand your question. We hated Obama's socialism, not the man.
Freedom of speech includes the right to criticize or slander long dead evil doers. Christianity is a much weaker religion than it once was. If you don't believe in punishment, it is largely irrelevant. Obama's promotion of Islam verbally and by immigration, endangers our western civilization.

Bennie...what are you smoking?

Put down the pipe!

Do you type this with a straight face? Just curious....and who is "we" in the part I highlighted?
 
Christianity is a much weaker religion than it once was. If you don't believe in punishment, it is largely irrelevant.

Point of Inquiry:

Is the absence of “belief in punishment” a primary explanation for why Christianity is now a much weaker religion?​
 
Originally I thought the Democrats were just a bunch of sniveling bigots, but now it's sadly obvious that the problem with American politics goes much deeper than that.
 
...just because there was a (gasp) Liberal in the White House.

Particularly when they up and installed a narcissistic clown and con-man into the office.
A liberal only in comparison to most other recent Presidents. Both Obama and Bill Clinton were centrists, and very much corporatists. I consider Carter to be the last "liberal" president here.

I saw a bumper sticker recently, which I liked: "ELECT A CLOWN. EXPECT A CIRCUS."
 
A liberal only in comparison to most other recent Presidents. Both Obama and Bill Clinton were centrists, and very much corporatists. I consider Carter to be the last "liberal" president here.

I saw a bumper sticker recently, which I liked: "ELECT A CLOWN. EXPECT A CIRCUS."

...and that is why the "opposition" is funny..they had more in common with the two of them than alot of liberals...

I am OK with the centrists because I understand the value of compromise...but when I list the politicians I love...Jimmy Carter is the only President who makes the list...BECAUSE he behaved like a Liberal and behaved with the integrity I admire the most...

The thing about the right wing..they think if they repeat something a billion times it becomes a fact....

It is funny that even Hillary would have been closer to what alot of them want than Trump....too bad they believed their own lies...
 
Originally I thought the Democrats were just a bunch of sniveling bigots, but now it's sadly obvious that the problem with American politics goes much deeper than that.
Green%2BFish%2Bon%2BHook.gif
 
It takes two wrongs to make Right. There is no actual conservative in sight.
 
A liberal only in comparison to most other recent Presidents. Both Obama and Bill Clinton were centrists, and very much corporatists. I consider Carter to be the last "liberal" president here.

I saw a bumper sticker recently, which I liked: "ELECT A CLOWN. EXPECT A CIRCUS."

Or in this case 'IT'

Pennywise-photo-700x300.jpg
 
^ Condemned for standing up (by sitting down) against the very thing the pardoned criminal was doing.

There's justice for you.
 
Somebody really need to buffer his weeken tweets. #i'vegot2knees
 
Back
Top