The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

Funny anti-religious Internet pics

Re: Funny anti-religious Internet pics

Religious convictions are human arrangements which inevitably fester within and try to gain authority. Authority corrupts, so inevitably religious convictions, as with all convictions, become corrupt. In general, the level/degree of corruption is related to the length of time the conviction has been festering around.

Rubbish. There are gobs of religious people who don't seek to gain any authority at all -- in fact there are entire branches of religions which deliberately seek to have no authority at all.

The driver of seeking authority is a mindset about the world, not religion. It can be found in religious, political, and any human realm.
 
Re: Funny anti-religious Internet pics

230-Which-day-did-God-make-the-fossils-650x657.jpg

That's a good one for fundamentalists. It's dumb for Christians with brains.
 
Re: Funny anti-religious Internet pics

Yes, but despite the fact that there is so much access to correct information, there's also access to total BS. Many articles on websites like Wikipedia have been corrupted by people with a pro-Christian agenda, thereby spreading misinformation.

No actual Christian would do such a thing. Besides that, the protections built in nowadays do an excellent job of dealing with such vandalism.

Though I did once repair an article some fundie dork had messed up, it was several years ago; new protections have been put in place.
 
Re: Funny anti-religious Internet pics

A great example is the article on Wikipedia called "The Historical Jesus." It makes completely erroneous claims.

That article has been attacked for being too pro-Christian at the same time it's been attacked for being anti-Christian at the same time as it's accused of being too slanted toward one or another school of thought. I almost got involved in all that once, but decided not to and settled for correcting some grammar and phrasing. The problem is that it's such an emotionally charged subject that any balanced article is going to get flak from all sorts of directions.
 
Re: Funny anti-religious Internet pics

I want to make a huge poster of this to roll up and smack the religious who complain about strident atheists with so have something real to cry about...:-<

attachment.php

Compared to A.C.Grayling the Jealous God from the Old Testament seems a lot less obnoxious.

 
Re: Funny anti-religious Internet pics

Yes. It was in fact the "Historicity of Jesus" article. I will, however, have to eat crow because most of what I took offense at is gone.

I do still question the veracity of some parts of the article.

There's a little overkill with the repetition of the notion that almost no scholars doubt the historicity of Jesus, but that is really stylistic, which is the article's main problem -- I think it's wordy and sloppy. If you look at the history page, there' been more than one 'battle' over content, one of which resulted in one of the contributors being censored.


But... we need a cartoon:

BIBLabrahamPush.gif
 
Re: Funny anti-religious Internet pics

Rubbish. There are gobs of religious people who don't seek to gain any authority at all -- in fact there are entire branches of religions which deliberately seek to have no authority at all.

The driver of seeking authority is a mindset about the world, not religion. It can be found in religious, political, and any human realm.

Oh please don't try to :bs: me . Authority gos with anything pretwnding to give an absolute superior answer to everything, without accepting any sort of reasonable discussion.
 
Re: Funny anti-religious Internet pics

No actual Christian would do such a thing. Besides that, the protections built in nowadays do an excellent job of dealing with such vandalism.

Though I did once repair an article some fundie dork had messed up, it was several years ago; new protections have been put in place.

No actual Christian would stir all the shit surrounding Christianism that we have been suffering for centuries.
 
Re: Funny anti-religious Internet pics

Rubbish. There are gobs of religious people who don't seek to gain any authority at all -- in fact there are entire branches of religions which deliberately seek to have no authority at all.

The driver of seeking authority is a mindset about the world, not religion. It can be found in religious, political, and any human realm.
..........

Hmmm.+Not+funny+just+thought+it+was+worth+posting_16ce81_4013494.jpg
 
Re: Funny anti-religious Internet pics

Kulindahr, I hate to go off topic but I'd like to hear your take on how many "actual christians" there are. Wikipedia says there are around 2 billion who call themselves that, but I think you would have to say far fewer.

On topix:

 
Re: Funny anti-religious Internet pics

Wow... that is very wise. I need to get into Voltaire.

Right, but, as usual, he just skimmed the surface of matters: for example, today those who rule over you do not even bother to directly rule, and whenever they actually care about you at all, they use some sort of straw symbol as that entity that Voltaire refers to as untouchable, so that they always divert people's attention and outrage from themselves.
 
Re: Funny anti-religious Internet pics

Wow... that is very wise. I need to get into Voltaire.

It is said that on his deathbed, Voltaire was asked by a priest if he wished to renounce Satan to which he replied, "now is not the time for making new enemies." :lol:
 
Re: Funny anti-religious Internet pics

Oh please don't try to :bs: me . Authority gos with anything pretwnding to give an absolute superior answer to everything, without accepting any sort of reasonable discussion.

Since you don't want to live in reality, I'll leave you to your fantasies.
 
Re: Funny anti-religious Internet pics


Cute. But where's the guy who runs through cities flipping off buildings and vaulting trash bins and stuff? I like those!

As soon as you start using the 'no true Scotsman' argument you've clearly lost it. :cool:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman

Then all of science has "clearly lost it", because they categorize things based on definitions all the time.

See, you're misapplying the No True Scotsman concept in a way that makes all knowledge invalid.
 
Re: Funny anti-religious Internet pics

Kulindahr, I hate to go off topic but I'd like to hear your take on how many "actual christians" there are. Wikipedia says there are around 2 billion who call themselves that, but I think you would have to say far fewer.

On topix:


I'm going to start with a rather scholarly distinction, between broad and narrow meanings: the broad meaning includes all that has a claim to some category, the narrow only those which fit a precise set of requirements. As an example, take the concept of "driver": in the broad definition, everyone who can get into a vehicle and manage to steer it along a course is a driver; in a narrow definition only those capable of handling most adverse conditions and dealing with on-road emergencies qualify. As another, "chess player": in the broad sense, anyone who knows how to move the pieces is a player; in the narrow sense only someone with a grasp of basic concepts of strategy makes the cut.

In the broad sense, anyone who claims to be a Christian is, because the term indicates followers of Christ, and anyone who says he's following has to be counted (this is the definition used by census-takers and pollsters). OTOH, in the narrow sense only those whose lives show significant characteristics of Christ to their neighbors (in the broad sense) count.

So, taking the narrow sense, that being what I mean in such comments as I made, I'd venture optimistically that five percent of those fitting the broad definition can be included in the narrow.

In a pastoral perspective, though, the narrow definition has to be adjusted to include all those making forward strides in showing those significant characteristics of Christ. These may appear to outsiders to be total losses, but consider someone who has been a thief, drug dealer, pimp, and murderer (with a lot more violence on the spectrum) who turns to Christ: if he changes so he's only stealing occasionally and has a GF who's also a prostitute, he's made some big strides. To all of us who don't know him, he won't appear as much of a Christian, definitely not in the narrow definition, but to those who know he's a testimony of how a life can change and keep changing. Including those, I'll expand my count to ten percent.

To some that may seem awfully pessimistic, but given the numbers who participate in hateful activities when the clear words of Christ condemn them, I don't think so. Some may be misled, but the words are there for them in the book, and there are ministers who expound those words clearly.

Of course many realize what they've really been doing when it gets close to the end, so it may be twenty or thirty percent or even more who die actual Christians -- but there's no way to gain data on that in the least, so it's outside the scope of even guessing.



Oh -- superb video; tragically quite true: many Christians run when faced with the real thing.
 
Re: Funny anti-religious Internet pics

It is said that on his deathbed, Voltaire was asked by a priest if he wished to renounce Satan to which he replied, "now is not the time for making new enemies." :lol:

ROFLAO That is unbelievably funny!
 
Back
Top