The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

Funny anti-religious Internet pics

Re: Funny anti-religious Internet pics

looseliam said:
attachment.php
Click to expand...


Oxygen...I need it....


ed2305b7.png
 
Re: Funny anti-religious Internet pics

Kulindahr said:
Does LEGO really make all those Bible pieces?
Click to expand...


I believe the guy that runs the site makes the pieces he needs if LEGO doesn’t have what is called for. LEGO does have a lot to work with though including religious pieces.
 
Re: Funny anti-religious Internet pics

StarCrasher said:
I think you have difficulties with fallacies. There is no more reason to believe in Jesus than Santa. The Santa pic is perfectly logical. Your belief in Santa, er, I mean Jesus, is based purely on faith. There are some ancient documents by some unknown authors making some exceptional claims and you believe it not because of evidence, but because of faith. You have faith in Jesus, just like children have faith in Santa.
Click to expand...

The comparison is made that adults are about Jesus like they are about Santa. That's false on the face of it: it's rare to find an adult who tells kids there's a Santa who actually believes it, while it's rare to find an adults who tells his kids about Jesus who doesn't believe it.

Epic fail, twice -- once by the poster, second by you.

Further, I know no no one who trusts and relies on Santa with confidence, which is what "faith" means in the Bible, while I know plenty who trust and rely on Jesus with confidence.

Epic fail, again -- you throw words around without knowing what they mean.
 
Re: Funny anti-religious Internet pics

StarCrasher said:
Except it's a verifiable fact that Darwin didn't say we descended from monkeys.

As for Jesus, we can't even verify he was a real person. He probably was, but it's certainly not verifiable fact. Again, you're relying on faith and faith alone. What Jesus did and didn't say is even more questionable. Certainly, Jesus, being 30-something years old, must have said more than what was just quoted of him in the gospel. And then assuming Jesus had supernatural powers and was the son of god is being plain silly.
Click to expand...

Yes -- because what you just said is that I am trusting and relying on Jesus with confidence.

Another fail: there's no "assuming" here; there's assessing the evidence, meeting the Person, and putting trust in Him.


BTW, it's also a verifiable fact that the Bible doesn't say a lot of the things that are claimed. Hearing all those claims is what drove me to study Greek and then Hebrew and Aramaic: I wanted to find out what was really being said. Of course I found out there was a lot more to it than that....
 
Re: Funny anti-religious Internet pics

StarCrasher said:
What lie, that you have no evidence?

You don't. It's true. There are only unverifiable and unlikely stories written by superstitious people in a time when people named Jesus and messiahs/prophets were a dime a dozen.

It's not called "faith" for nothing.
Click to expand...

He was called "Joshua/Yeshua", actually: he was Jewish :mrgreen: Cf#392 :cool:
 
Re: Funny anti-religious Internet pics

There is evidence for divinity.

Note that "evidence" represents tangible things & events, or credible records of them, that remain. "Divinity" is a theory that purports to explain that evidence.

I'd say it's as good a theory as any, except I am not convinced it is the best theory or even equally good. I think that there are other explanations for the accounts, records and artifacts, which are much more convincing than the theory of divinity.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top