The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

Funny anti-religious Internet pics

Re: Funny anti-religious Internet pics

Kulindahr said:
No, the core is to read it for what it is. Literalism reads literally without any care as to what is meant.
Click to expand...

What it is is an amalgam of political opportunism, and well-meaning but befuddled folklore, nursed along by a profitable established clergy over the course of a millennium or two. Well, two.
 
Re: Funny anti-religious Internet pics

do_it_yourself_easter_kit_mousepad-r33dfcbf6c3334a0d98d47a9216c9c477_x74vi_8byvr_512.jpg
 
Re: Funny anti-religious Internet pics

^^ Wow. This is a fine example of the "happiness and love" that comes with faith. :rolleyes:
 
Re: Funny anti-religious Internet pics

zoltanspawn said:
So...your belief in the literal resurrection of Christ is peripheral to your christianity?

Reading the resurrection of Christ literally is careless as to what is meant?
Click to expand...

What???

Literalism and believing in the literal resurrection have nothing to do with each other.
 
Re: Funny anti-religious Internet pics

To make Kul's point clearer, he means that whatever fantastic or incredible by human, terrestrial standards which is directly related to God (Son or Spirit) must be taken literally without contradiction and without being considered literalism, since whatever is divine is literal in its own fantastic way, while whatever created part that in the Scriptures does not follow the laws of Creation is to be understood in a purely interpretive, symbolic way: is that it?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top