- Joined
- Oct 5, 2005
- Posts
- 8,804
- Reaction score
- 6
- Points
- 0
Re: Funny anti-religious Internet pics
One minute, you state evil is a consequence of making free choices, the next that choice doesn't bear on the situation. Now, the problem is actually a different vague concept, that of supernatural fealty...regarding interference...with us...about something...
If you ask me, a god that willingly allows foot-roasting has bigger problems than a reputation for half-baked promises. Personally, I'd take the half-baked promises if I were you.
There's no comparison in my statement, God chooses to do nothing to stop children from being tortured to death because we haven't comported ourselves with his wishes? so this is nonsense.
It has nothing to do with "concepts about choice", vague or otherwise.
If, after having assigned us authority over Creation, God stepped in and started interfering with every last individual life -- or, for that matter, even one -- what would His word be worth?
One minute, you state evil is a consequence of making free choices, the next that choice doesn't bear on the situation. Now, the problem is actually a different vague concept, that of supernatural fealty...regarding interference...with us...about something...
If you ask me, a god that willingly allows foot-roasting has bigger problems than a reputation for half-baked promises. Personally, I'd take the half-baked promises if I were you.
You highlighted minor elements and missed the point. Your error is sort of like looking at a new minivan and saying, "It's just like a barn -- they both have doors!"
There's no comparison in my statement, God chooses to do nothing to stop children from being tortured to death because we haven't comported ourselves with his wishes? so this is nonsense.





