The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

gay chavs

Re: gay cahvs

teh_nathan said:
If you have nothing better to do than flame someone, I suggest you find better things to do with your time.

I didn't mention grammar. I mentioned spelling. But apparently, you're too into flaming someone to know exactly what you're talking about.

His grammar was fine. His SPELLING was wayyy off. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to tell the difference between spelling and grammar.

I feel really bad for you that I have to explain this:
Spelling is (you can't use the same word in a definition about itself): forming words with letters according to the principles underlying accepted usage
Grammar is sentence structure, semantics and the like.

Learn what the hell you're talking about first before you flame someone, you might form a logical argument that way.
Click to expand...
Not to start anything..... [i will, however, take the chav's side]
Being myself a grammar freak, and after a very brief runover of the dialect being used here, it is simply onomatopoeic- therefore within constraints of proper grammar, and likely within the grammatical rules of the particular area this person lives: duhr. Furthermore, running withthe comment about him trying to be cute by spelling his words as such, it is simply not the case. As in an aforementioned statement, it is onomatopoeic in nature, and had nothing to do with cute factor. He types as he speaks, and clearly is educated, as is illustrated by the syntax and semantics of his grammar. We are obviously a diverse group of people, and it would be best to learn about other ways of going about stuff, rather than keeping an obviously pig-headed "American" mindset about "Our way, or no way" approach on everything.
 
There's no shame in being called a chav- so long as you accept it. It'e like being gay. No shame innit unless you don't accept it.
 
Re: gay cahvs

number2 said:
Not to start anything..... [i will, however, take the chav's side]
Being myself a grammar freak, and after a very brief runover of the dialect being used here, it is simply onomatopoeic- therefore within constraints of proper grammar, and likely within the grammatical rules of the particular area this person lives: duhr. Furthermore, running withthe comment about him trying to be cute by spelling his words as such, it is simply not the case. As in an aforementioned statement, it is onomatopoeic in nature, and had nothing to do with cute factor. He types as he speaks, and clearly is educated, as is illustrated by the syntax and semantics of his grammar. We are obviously a diverse group of people, and it would be best to learn about other ways of going about stuff, rather than keeping an obviously pig-headed "American" mindset about "Our way, or no way" approach on everything.
Click to expand...
Completely owned.
Nice to see people put in their place.

SAFE N THAT BLADS. braap that fukkout getme getyou GETUS!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top