I can always tell when you are writing from a very emotional place because your English becomes worse than that of the illegal immigrants you hate so much.
I'm just saying...
I do not know to what "misinformation" you could be referring, but I am always pleased when you bring me a semblance of facts rather than chest thumping racist rhetoric.
So let us begin, shall we?
It was said after the Civil War that without that cheap labor the country would collapse.
Perhaps, I don't know. I was not there.
But I will say this much. I have never claimed that illegal immigration was necessary to the US economy. I have stated that the economy tends (out of pure laziness and greed) to rely upon it. But when told they can no longer do so, they will find another way and move on. American business people are very resourceful that way. They definitely lead the world in that respect.
The impact on the lower skilled workers in this country and middle class is unreal and yet you support illegal immigration.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB115205920728097930.html?mod=Letters
I never said that I supported illegal immigration and I made that point apparent in an earlier post when I stated that while I do not excuse it, I only tried to explain it to the heartless and insensitive people who were unable to think beyond their own necessities and interests. If you felt that I was speaking to you...well...I mean really...what can I do about that?
I would like to quote something from the article you posted, if I may:
Perhaps they should ask the 15% of unemployed workers who have less than a high-school education how they feel about being such a small, trivial group.
And for the moderators who seem to believe that the same link can never be cited too many times:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB115205920728097930.html?mod=Letters
Now, I have checked the statistice from the USD Bureau of Labour Statistics and was fortunate enough to als find a delighhtful Wikipedia article which cites all of the same information, so here goes:
There was an official measure of 7.6 million unemployed in the U.S. as of January 2008, a rate of 4.9%.
For the mods and of course your own personal edification:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unemployment
This figure either means that we had a roaring boom over a period of three years that then just disappeared, or, that your lovely congressman Rohrabacher was exaggerating slightly.
I'm just saying...
The heart of this argument asserts that ...
[Quoted text: Truncated by Moderator] © 2008 Dow Jones, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
http://online.wsj.com/public/page/subscriber_agreement.html
6. Limitations on Use.
c. You agree not to rearrange or modify the Content. You agree not to create abstracts from, scrape or display headlines from our content for use on another web site or service. You agree not to post any content from the Services to weblogs, newsgroups, mail lists or electronic bulletin boards, without our written consent.
From the same WSJ article cited above (
if the mods want the same link, they can put it there themselves...)
This is the same doomsday stupidity that you have been trying to spread here and until I see some serious data to back it up, I will continue to refer to it as fear factor drivel.
Speaking of which, you were awfully silent about that craziness you were spreading about that bill which seemed to frighten you so much. I was so looking forward to your explanation as to how your "journalistic" source had screwed up so badly and how your lack of ability to read for yourself put you in such an interesting pickle with regards to your "credibility". I feel sort of deprived here.
Its funny how in LA Chicago and other cities High School graduation rates are some times near 50% but you are saying we do not have enough un skilled people in the USA. Most of thes unskilled people are in inner city areas.
I agree. But the problem is that these are people who come from poor areas with high rates of crime and little incentive to work the jobs that people who come from other parts of the world would kill or die to do. It is easier for the native borns to take welfare and/or rob or sell drugs as far as they are concerned.
But lets give citizenship so we can get MORE illegal immigrants in here right? And then it can be a constant circle of citizenship, illegal entry, no control of our borders and immigration.
More of that doomsday silliness, eh?
As stated in the video that you probably did not watch.
I watched 4 minutes and five seconds of it and I have to say that this man made Al Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth" look like a double feature of "Iron Man" and "The Incredible Hulk" (Norton not Bana).
I have no idea where he got the majority of his data, and when he does cite sources it is only as a spring board for him to launch into other fear factor projections for which he has no proof. It was like watching you on YouTube, for Heaven's sake!
(The old you, not the new and improved you!

)
There are 4.6 BILLION people on the planet in more poverty then the Mexicans comming in the USA. Should we take all these 4.6 Billion people? Please tell me.
A bit of an exaggeration, but I get your point. I never said that I was for unchecked immigration. The comment I made regarding no checks on previous immigrants was as a question of the motivations of so many anti immigration advocates today. I know this does not include you, as you have already stated several times that you are not anti-immigration.
Please stop putting two "m's" in the word "coming". I am not always able to concentrate on the point you are trying to make when you spell with sexual connotations...
So we can take 2 million people a year in the USA LEGALLY and it still we not work out. The 3rd world will add another 80 million people births over deaths. WE ARE NOT OBLIGATED TO TAKE OTHER CITIZENS OF OTHER COUNTRIES. IF WE WISH TO STOP ALL IMMIGRATION TO THE USA WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO DO THAT!!! But that is not what I am saying.
Quite right. The problem is that you cannot control the rates of immigration with the policy as it stands. How do you think this country would stop immigration entirely if it even attempted to try? I'd love to see that just for the hell of it...
We have people comming in the USA who are more loyal to the country they came from the USA. They take this country for granted. We can not take the worlds population that is fact all we can do is pick the best people. Illegal immigration is unchecked people.
You seem to think that leaving one's country is an easy thing to do. People do not leave because they hate their country and cannot wait to become a third class citizen in America. They leave because they have no other options in their own country. They can be excused for still loving where they came from.
You are from the US. You love the US. Nothing wrong with that, right?
I come from Argentina. I love Argentina. That will never change. I live part of the year in Geneva and Paris. I love those places as well. That will not change either. The provincial xenophobia of some Americans who believe in the Bush mantra of either with or against are so sorely behind the times and ignorant of the global world in which we presently live.
It is sad, because that attitude will eventually leave America in the provincial dustbin of world standing one day, and you arrogant bastards cannot even see it yet.
On to your remarks about immigraton no controls being put on the Germans and Poles. You have not read I can see.
I love when you do the whole "I'm so clever" thing. It's so cute...
The Acts and events which you cite took place over one hundred years after a continuous flow of unchecked immigration into this country. It is to that period which I referred.