The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

Gay Marriage Updates By State

Once again, the Republicians first order of business when they got power in N.C. was to target gays and lesbians.
There is no logicial reason why anyone who is gay or lesbian should support a party that clearly hates them.
 
I wonder who they'll target after gays and lesbians?
 
Powerful speech.

Metta,
"They" already tried for some of those, plus Catholics.

Their name was Ku Klux Klan.
 
The only problem is "Who gets to define Hate?"

And, you've got to catch them, first.
 
They should just ban all hate groups and their members from Facebook.

I was just thinking that we should tell the hate groups that by being part of FB they are supporting the homosexual agenda, being that one of the co-owners not only gay, he also pushes for marriage equality.
 
The nc amendment proposal limits civil union rights too. I have a hunch this thing will pass in may.
 
I was just thinking that we should tell the hate groups that by being part of FB they are supporting the homosexual agenda, being that one of the co-owners not only gay, he also pushes for marriage equality.

LOL -- I love it!

But don't tell them -- take out a full page ad in the area paper:

AFA Supports Homosexual Agenda

And explain how their presence on FB helps advance gay causes.

Then thank them.
devilgrin.gif
 
Once again, the Republicians first order of business when they got power in N.C. was to target gays and lesbians.
There is no logicial reason why anyone who is gay or lesbian should support a party that clearly hates them.

When people vote with their Bibles instead of their wallets, this is what happens.

It amazes how much of the South is Republican territory when over half the residents are either poor, black, fat, or any of those combinations.

Republicans=Rich

Democrats=Democracy
 
Miller referred to comments made by Rep. Mark Hilton, R-Catawba, earlier this year during a closed-door GOP caucus meeting in which the microphones were left on and the sound was accidentally piped into the Legislative Building pressroom. During the caucus, Hilton said that the proposed same-sex marriage ban was needed to help conservative groups “get their ground game working.”

http://www.newbernsj.com/news/republicans-100091-constitutional-sex.html
 
North Carolina: get a load of this

The vote will be in May 2012 instead of November 2012, as originally planned, said Rep. Bill Owens, a Democrat, because the Democrats would have voted against it with a November balloting.

Over the summer, a House Republican said the marriage amendment needed to be on the November ballot to encourage conservative voters to get to the polls for the general election.

By moving to May, during the primary, Owens said, the amendment vote will be based on the issue instead of partisan politics, and the sooner it is passed, the less opportunity there is for a court to make ruling to legalize gay marriage before it takes effect.

Four or five Democrats, including Owens, agreed to vote for the amendment because of the move from November to May, Owens said.

In other words we're being sold out by the Democrats. They're afraid if the proposal is on the November 2012 ballot, it would bring out the conservative voters, who would then vote for Michele Bachmann*. So they traded their votes to move the balloting to May.

*or whoever
 
North Carolina: get a load of this



In other words we're being sold out by the Democrats. They're afraid if the proposal is on the November 2012 ballot, it would bring out the conservative voters, who would then vote for Michele Bachmann*. So they traded their votes to move the balloting to May.

*or whoever

Question: would it have passed without those votes?
 
Back
Top