The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Getting Closer To A Fiscal Cliff Deal

Do you know what the contribution of your tax bracket is to the federal income?

How does the phrase "our money" not typify the foundation of socialism in US government?

My point is that he wants the government to spend tax money from other people not him.
 
Um Jack the website you link to shows you are incorrect. first of all the purchase was for 90% of the store not 80% and in now way whatsoever does it reference underselling the competition to push granny and grampy retailer out of business. I live in the area now and while a large portion of people I talk with go to NFM many do not because there is only one store and the prices arent that much different than the other retailers in my rather swank Overland Park (better than Missouri) part of town.

Now could you provide some proof NFM pushes the smaller operations out of the market?

Seems to me your just pissy because they built in Kansas. Of course it is quite odd for a free wheel, no or low tax republican to bitch about business ownership.
 
My point is that he wants the government to spend tax money from other people not him.

That doesn't sound different from ANY rich person, which is why I pretty much just ignore the limp outrage from people like yourself about the so-called parasites who "are immune from the taxes and spending they vote on."

Were Cheney and people with shares in defense and oil industries the only people who accrued debt from the Iraq War? No? Then it works both ways and stop complaining about it. You're inventing a fictional "us and them" mindset where only one side gets some type of benefit they aren't paying for. It goes both ways.
 
Regardless on Jan 1st two million families will be taken off of unemployment benefits. Which will put all of those folks on the dole once again. Additionally their spending which is dollar for dollar of what they receive ... so if the average weekly amount to a claimant is 295 then 2.4 Billion leaves our economy immediately...

Add to that the failure of the House to pass a farm bill and consider milk and dairy prices doubling.....

Hope all of you have saved up for your republican driven recession.
 
Um Jack the website you link to shows you are incorrect. first of all the purchase was for 90% of the store not 80% and in now way whatsoever does it reference underselling the competition to push granny and grampy retailer out of business. I live in the area now and while a large portion of people I talk with go to NFM many do not because there is only one store and the prices arent that much different than the other retailers in my rather swank Overland Park (better than Missouri) part of town.

Now could you provide some proof NFM pushes the smaller operations out of the market?

Seems to me your just pissy because they built in Kansas. Of course it is quite odd for a free wheel, no or low tax republican to bitch about business ownership.

Name some furniture stores in KC. A couple of dumpy stores and maybe 1 or 2 old family stores that are struggling to stay open -- Nebraska Furniture Mart has crushed the competition -- and will do the same in DFW.

In your small mindedness, I would expect you to think that it's because the store is in Kansas. Wrong. You live in the white only section of Kansas -- the NFM store is in the segregated white section of the black county you joco folks like to make fun of.
 
Since Obama just increased the deficit by about $1 billion/year with his executive order on raises for executives -- can anyone really say that Obama is serious about curbing spending or controlling the deficit?

I don't think Obama really gives a fuck about the financial security of the USA.
 
No worries ........ Pres. Obama is making the Sunday Talk Show rounds today ........ all is saved

I hear his basic premise is to blame Boehner/McConnell/Repubs

but by all means watch for yourself

this is a guy who didn't show up for months - while campaigning

and he's still campaigning it seems

blame game bullshit

accountability for all but ME

Happy New Year american public :)
 
Four more years Chance.

Four more years.
 
No worries ........ Pres. Obama is making the Sunday Talk Show rounds today ........ all is saved

I hear his basic premise is to blame Boehner/McConnell/Repubs

but by all means watch for yourself

this is a guy who didn't show up for months - while campaigning

and he's still campaigning it seems

blame game bullshit

accountability for all but ME

Happy New Year american public :)

How exactly is the inability of the Republican Congress to budge or compromise even when it's in their own best interest his fault exactly?

I get that he's a black socialist Democrat and all that, but beyond that an actual reason would be nice.
 
How exactly is the inability of the Republican Congress to budge or compromise even when it's in their own best interest his fault exactly?

I get that he's a black socialist Democrat and all that, but beyond that an actual reason would be nice.

Compromise is like the tango. It takes two.
 
He is not willing to reduce spending enough to make progress toward eliminating the defecit. The tax raise is the only bargaining chip the Republicans have, and if they give it up without solving the deficit problem, it is only a matter of time until we bankrupt the country.
 
GREAT!!!!

A spending cut proponent LETS CUT HOMELAND SECURITY!!!!!

Agreed. We need costs reductions in national security and the U.S. military. Those who should be paying more taxes should begin at $75,000. No reductions with Social Security benefits. No raising of the age for qualifying for Social Security.
 
How exactly is the inability of the Republican Congress to budge or compromise even when it's in their own best interest his fault exactly?

I get that he's a black socialist Democrat and all that, but beyond that an actual reason would be nice.

u don't get Jack

clearly
 
Back
Top