- Joined
- Dec 31, 2007
- Posts
- 60,564
- Reaction score
- 14,273
- Points
- 113
Get serious, mate. You asked us to name one of his victims, and They Are Children!!! How perverted can you get to want to know which little kid was molested so Salling could blow a load looking at him or her?
I find myself in the peculiar position of explaining Telstra's thoughts but I think the point he's trying to make is what the psychologist is trying to say in the video.
The evidence is that Salling had a pedophilic interest but there's no evidence that he was a child molester. In the words of the psychologist, child molesters should be handled by the criminal justice system; pedophiles should be in treatment to prevent them from becoming child molesters.
The point that I made earlier was that all the effort that was made in prosecuting Salling could have been directed toward finding and prosecuting the people who produced and participated in making the material that Salling possessed.
...and you just brought up something not related to Salling (which is off-topic) but is the other corollary- we prosecute and incarcerate lots of people without every treating them for their addictions which is why the reincarceration rates are also high for addicts.fabulouslyghetto said:So this is how the other side handles their problems, sympathy and treatment are stressed over incarceration.
We also know that some people are born with a hereditary predisposition toward addiction. And it's also something that if we studied it, we might be able to prevent that predisposition toward addiction from becoming actual addiction. Instead, we wait until they become criminals and then we send them into the criminal justice system to start the cycle.

