There is the possibility that a workplace can also be a public accommodation. They (he?) may very well have the right to block whatever they (he) wants. But the people (plaintiffs) have the right to contest the action in open court.
Due process. If the jury rules in favor of the people, the DOA is DOA. If not, the governator wins: no wi-fi. This is a case where the technology has surpassed the political action and should be debated anyway.
However, this discussion may just be a "tempest in a teapot." By now, I wouldn't be surprised if Madison residents have offered the use of their DSL lines or I-Phones to the "bottom feeders" and "freeloaders."
In any event: