The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Gov. Walker has decided to suspend 1st Amendment

Pretty pitiful really.
 
Oh yeah, i'm sure the Governor had the site shutdown! It's a conspiracy! :rolleyes:
 
All you had to do was read the article and you would have found your explanation.

DOA's security software automatically blocked the site, as it does all new websites
Click to expand...
 
laikaNYC said:
All you had to do was read the article and you would have found your explanation.
Click to expand...

I did read the article. Your interpretation is one-sided and so predictable. In your estimation, Michael Tate, who disagrees with you has to be lying. Your claims are always so bush (small "b") league.

P.S. Please give Frank L. my best. :luv:
 
chrisrobin said:
I did read the article. Your interpretation is one-sided and so predictable. In your estimation, Michael Tate, who disagrees with you has to be lying. Your claims are always so bush (small "b") league.

P.S. Please give Frank L. my best. :luv:
Click to expand...

A Democrat accusing Walker? How shocking! But you're accussing the State Department of Administration of being liars.
 
The state shouldn't be providing free wi-fi to anybody for anything. Shut it off completely.

And the complaint about being undemocratic doesn't ring too true when the democrats are in hiding in effect closing the government. Maybe they should come back to work and register a complaint.
 
laikaNYC said:
All you had to do was read the article and you would have found your explanation.
Click to expand...

You should have continued reading.

It says the site was working previously, and now isn't.

Hence, it wasn't just a site disallowed by default by security software.

Some kind of update was made either to the software or something which resulted in the site being blocked when it was not before.

That said, it's not really a huge issue imo. Anyone with internet on their phone could still have accessed any website they wanted at the capitol.
 
loki81 said:
I appreciate how your thread title doesn't blow things out of proportion at all.

what aspect of the first amendment entitles you to wifi access again?
Click to expand...

They think their entitled to quite a bit, this bunch...|
 
This unexperienced Freshmen Republican is acting thuggish, stubborn and intolerant. He's doing the job the Koch brothers are paying him for.

This will lead towards his impeachment and possibly imprisonment.

A short while ago, Scott Walker fired all the Milwaukee County Courthouse security guards because they were unionized, and hired non-union security guards who's supervisor had a criminal record. He didn't save the money as he claimed, and a judge ruled what he did was illegal and all the fired union security guards were rehired. This will cost Milwaukee County even more money.

Scott Walker is a failure as a governor already!
 
loki81 said:
I appreciate how your thread title doesn't blow things out of proportion at all.

what aspect of the first amendment entitles you to wifi access again?
Click to expand...

You're right. The Founding Fathers did not mention anything about Wi-Fi in the U.S. Constitution.
 
laikaNYC said:
A Democrat accusing Walker? How shocking! But you're accussing the State Department of Administration of being liars.
Click to expand...

Please re-read. Michael Tate is not in the State Department of Administration. Or, you are reading a different article other than the one I posted.

What is accussing? An accusation using bad words? :confused:
 
loki81 said:
using the wifi in the state house (specifically as a guest account) likely falls under the heading of a privilege, not a right. it's not as if they're trying to shut the website down for being critical of the government.

the other week, I wasn't able to access JUB on my phone at my doctor's office (using the hospital's wifi, not my wireless network). I wouldn't consider that an infringement on my first amendment rights.
Click to expand...

Let them tell it to the judge. You know, due process.
 
Walker is a thug. Worldwide this is an anti-thug era. Too bad he didn't go into teaching instead of politics. Oh, that's right. One needs a degree to teach.
 
the guy is doing the same thing they are trying in the middle east.

He is trying to block their ability to organize on the internet. The site he blocked is the one that the protesters use to communicate through.

They will get around it, so they are not the ones with an issue.

The person with the issue is the Gov that thinks he can do this and not have repercussions. This is going to be HATED by the young voters of america and believe me, the internet generation is going to harp on this. It is the stuff that urban legends are made of.

This governor is heading for a recall vote. Can they do that there?
 
BostonPirate said:
the guy is doing the same thing they are trying in the middle east.

He is trying to block their ability to organize on the internet. The site he blocked is the one that the protesters use to communicate through.

They will get around it, so they are not the ones with an issue.

The person with the issue is the Gov that thinks he can do this and not have repercussions. This is going to be HATED by the young voters of america and believe me, the internet generation is going to harp on this. It is the stuff that urban legends are made of.

This governor is heading for a recall vote. Can they do that there?
Click to expand...

If you were talking about the internet in general, you might have a point. But we're talking about the WiFi for the WI statehouse, which was never meant to be used for this purpose. This is no different than an employer blocking facebook or anything else that is a) eating up bandwidth, or b) distracting from the ability of people to work. There is nothing insidious or wrong about it.

The first amendment argument is nonsense, and the controversy is just being ginned up as one more reason to criticize Walker.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top