The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Hannity Ripped to Shreds by Democratic Rep. Keith Ellison

Yeah, chance in particular seems to be under the delusion that everyone would totally see what he sees in any video he or one of the other free thinkers posts, and therefore anyone who disagrees, obviously hasn't seen the video.

Um, no, we usually have seen it. We just didn't see what YOU saw in it. Let the dying of shock commence.

That's what The Outcasts do. Attack the messenger not the message.
 
Taking God's name in vain refers first and foremost to claiming to be one of God's people and a loyal follower, but acting entirely contrary to that assertion.

Excellent examples can be found on the list of recent Republican primary candidates for president.

Still spreading the hate around, I see.

- - - Updated - - -

I watched the video.

Hannity remains a rude, lying, disrespectful, manipulative, intellectually challenged partisan hack.

... and the Congressman?
 
Still spreading the hate around, I see.

- - - Updated - - -



... and the Congressman?

I like how, in lieu of any actual legitimate dispute with the substance of what was said, you guys are instead turning it into a formal etiquette competition between Hannity and the Congressman.

Who cares. I'm not going to lose any sleep about a member of government being less than polite to the people who've been helping to poison American discourse and misinform American voters for years.
 
I like how, in lieu of any actual legitimate dispute with the substance of what was said, you guys are instead turning it into a formal etiquette competition between Hannity and the Congressman.

Who cares. I'm not going to lose any sleep about a member of government being less than polite to the people who've been helping to poison American discourse and misinform American voters for years.
Americans, generally too dense and emotional for actual discussion, tend to base their opinion of the performance of others upon the political views of that person.

The elected official is clearly lacking in terms of intelligence and argument, but that does not stop people who claim affiliation to the same clan from ignoring those issues. "He says things that I agree with, so he must be correct" Why is he correct? "Because I agree with him." (Or possibly, "because I disagree with the other guy.")

It is not anything that is admirable. However, what else do you want? Political knowledge is lacking. The "supporters" of Ellison likely think that his "first amendment" comment was appropriate or meaningful (it was not). They likely also find his enraged demeanor to be justified by the presence of the host (it was not either). He really just showed that he was an ass, but, for his supporters, he is their ass. They will never abandon one of their own, unless he agrees with someone from the "other" team.
 
Who says Hannity isn't ?

Ellison is supposed to be better than that

Your choice to focus on Hannity and ignore the frother

Speaks volumes

Worse that u saw then commented

Evidence of affliction

If someone presents me with a fruit basket that holds a cobra among decaying apples, I tend to focus on the cobra.
 
If someone presents me with a fruit basket that holds a cobra among decaying apples, I tend to focus on the cobra.

you were presented with a video of a an elected official going ape shit on a known conservative windbag. The premise for the thread is "hannity ripped to shreds" and the thread author is taking glee in the fact that an elected congressman screamed and yelled and ranted and raved at Hannity

how great that was

your response is about hannity's history

you can try to hide from that fact but it just makes u a water carrier for the likes of ellison and damages your brand
 
Hannity has been criticizing Rep. Ellison for the past three days, without Ellison being there to defend himself. [-X

For Neocon demagogues: pushback = hate. We used to call that bullying.
 
you were presented with a video of a an elected official going ape shit on a known conservative windbag. The premise for the thread is "hannity ripped to shreds" and the thread author is taking glee in the fact that an elected congressman screamed and yelled and ranted and raved at Hannity

how great that was

your response is about hannity's history

you can try to hide from that fact but it just makes u a water carrier for the likes of ellison and damages your brand

I seem to recall you were utterly fine with Boehner telling other elected representatives to go fuck themselves and similar.

Hannity is, as Kul pointed out, just a viper.
 
you were presented with a video of a an elected official going ape shit on a known conservative windbag. The premise for the thread is "hannity ripped to shreds" and the thread author is taking glee in the fact that an elected congressman screamed and yelled and ranted and raved at Hannity

how great that was

your response is about hannity's history

you can try to hide from that fact but it just makes u a water carrier for the likes of ellison and damages your brand

I suspect that in your universe, there are neither parallel lines nor perpendicular ones.

I didn't say a word about Hannity's history, BTW, just what I saw right there.
 
Hannity has been criticizing Rep. Ellison for the past three days, without Ellison being there to defend himself. [-X

For Neocon demagogues: pushback = hate. We used to call that bullying.

actually that's called the power of having the microphone

and Ellison started the shit storm for NO reason other than he needed to hyperventilate

for some odd reason

he's gotta go back to his day job - helping the people of his district and the country - that's HIS job

and he did himself no favors

feel free to start a thread about sean hannity - you're not gonna get much push back
 
I suspect that in your universe, there are neither parallel lines nor perpendicular ones.

I didn't say a word about Hannity's history, BTW, just what I saw right there.

in my universe very few people pack a gun or obsess about owning one or more
or think that by arming everyone, we're all safer
in my universe

as for hannity - u have shared nothing about ellison and focused on hannity in a thread about ellison taking hannity to the woodshed

sorry that ur universe works that way

but it's not universal
 
I was here a long time before I knew JUB had anything to do with porn.

If you want to pursue this, please show me examples of porn in this forum.

You don't see it 'cause you're a "VIP" member.

Reverend Springer sees ads for pornography at the top and bottom of every page. There's a choice one at the bottom from Men.com featuring flying semen and twinks anally violated.

Something he experienced last time he was in the pokey.
 
[Quoted Post: Removed]

Chance, "it was okay because it wasn't in front of a camera but it was to another representative while talking about politics in washington" is a Republican way to look at things. Style over substance. This guy is an elected representative. Hannity isn't. Hannity acts like he is. Hannity tries to sway votes with misinformation and handed-down talking points. Hannity poisons the well of the American political scene. He's not a politician of different views, he's someone actively trying to give people bent and twisted views to get them to vote Republican and using one-sided spin and misinformation, most of it handed to him, in order to do it.

Hannity's someone actually trying to create the kinds of voters the Founding Fathers were terrified of. Misinformed, ignorant, apathetic voters who vote on gut, emotion and prejudice.
 
Hannity is a non issue my friend - he's Rush lite - he's a zero

Ellison has responsibilities that are real - and his actions speak volumes about the congress which is not a cable news network

get off hannity - NO ONE here defends him - he is indefensible as an orator - he is a clown

as for ellison, what could he possibly be thinking ? what is the purpose of engaging hannity like that ?

rachel maddow would've done a much better job (as ellison against hannity)

as for boehner - men are men - politics is tough biz - harry went over the line - boehner overreacted - i get it - i'm fine with it

has NOTHING to do with this
 
Hannity is a non issue my friend - he's Rush lite - he's a zero

Ellison has responsibilities that are real - and his actions speak volumes about the congress which is not a cable news network

get off hannity - NO ONE here defends him - he is indefensible as an orator - he is a clown

as for ellison, what could he possibly be thinking ? what is the purpose of engaging hannity like that ?

rachel maddow would've done a much better job (as ellison against hannity)

as for boehner - men are men - politics is tough biz - harry went over the line - boehner overreacted - i get it - i'm fine with it

has NOTHING to do with this

I agree Rachel would have done a better job. But let's bear in mind she's a friggin Rhodes scholar who's made a career out of engaging right wing shills and has years of experience doing so in TV and radio. So since you're not defending Hannity, what's the problem? That Ellison ripped into him but not as eloquently as Rachel Maddow would have? It's like when you said it was okay for us to dislike Tebow but we "took it too far." I don't get the difference.
 
Back
Top