The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Highly educated Democrats are now way more liberal than the rest of the party

You write very distinctively in haiku...If you are Chance, then why not say?
I know the answer to your theory - it's either yes or no. I'm not saying either way. (And, it doesn't matter - BenDan provides another voice to our Forums.)

And Bernie was a fool for saying he'll endorse her.
Um, when was this? I missed it.
 
^ Bernie has made it clear that all Democrats have to come together behind Hillary if she is the candidate.
 
Blah blah blah. Her "lukewarm" voters have won the nomination for her. Unlike the losers who need to be "inspired".

Just because you and your candidate are doing a bad job of proving why she would make a good President, doesn't mean you have to resort to name calling. Again, the blame game has already started but if these people don't turn out to vote for her the fault is not completely on them. Deciding to participate in voting doesn't make them losers just because they're not voting for who want them to.
 
Just because you and your candidate are doing a bad job of proving why she would make a good President, doesn't mean you have to resort to name calling. Again, the blame game has already started but if these people don't turn out to vote for her the fault is not completely on them. Deciding to participate in voting doesn't make them losers just because they're not voting for who want them to.

You're quite right. The fact that many of them are unengaged, ignorant and have never cared about politics makes them losers.
 
What is better, being ignorant or just repeating the rhetoric that you candidate says?
 
equate legitimate progressive disdain for Hilary with Republican congressional Benghazi hearings

this is what we call a logical fallacy and it goes like this: its easier to lie to yourself and believe your opponent must be working for the other team than to accept the criticisms as the truth, because that would require questioning every other judgement you have made against republicans and sanders supporters. to double down on the dishonesty, Clinton supporters believe because Sanders and Trump are both saying the same thing, they both must be lying. :lol:
 
Blah blah blah. Her "lukewarm" voters have won the nomination for her. Unlike the losers who need to be "inspired".

the same people who supported Obama are supporting Sanders. she has the same base of support she did 8 years ago plus the black voters who cant vote for Obama anymore. if anyone needed to be inspired it was the same hillary people 8 years ago that couldnt beat Obama then and wont defeat Trump now.
 
I supported Obama in the primaries and now support Hillary. She lost in 2008 because Obama ran a better campaign. Mark Penn didn't even know California was proportional. It was embarrassing.

Bernie has lost because Hispanics and African Americans simply don't believe he can deliver.... and they're correct.

"If Hispanic Americans perceive that a GOP nominee or candidate does not want them in the United States (i.e. self-deportation), they will not pay attention to our next sentence."

"By the year 2050 we'll be a majority-minority country and in both 2008 and 2012 President Obama won a combined 80 percent of the votes of all minority group...... The RNC cannot and will not write off any demographic or community or region of this country."
 
yes attacking the messenger of truth is convenient but it doesn't change the facts

Hillary is no progressive - all of the points have been shown to you and others proving so

and your response is "you're not really for Bernie"

and that this is a Republican attack on Hillary

it's for all to see in words and sentences

you've no bullets in your gun and you're surrounded by the truth

I guess back to topic now ......

Since Bernie wants to educate all for free - free tuition and all

I guess the implication is more educated more liberal/progressive more likely to vote that way

smart man that Bernie

Good dodge--you should consider going into politics.;)
 
Anyone making the median or better isn't affected by the minimum wage in any way that counts; ten cents difference in the price of a Big Mac doesn't even register.

Yes they are, everyone in the system is impacted by the minimum wage, or lack of it - it impacts not only what things cost, but how much people are paid.
 
Just because you and your candidate are doing a bad job of proving why she would make a good President, doesn't mean you have to resort to name calling. Again, the blame game has already started but if these people don't turn out to vote for her the fault is not completely on them. Deciding to participate in voting doesn't make them losers just because they're not voting for who want them to.

Yeah, you're playing the blame game with disappointed fervor because Bernie was never winning and has pretty much lost, and now the shine is off the halo as he purses his completely UN-democratic strategy of kissing up to all those super-delegates he hated so.

Oh how the mighty have fallen.
 
Then you should have gone to Oral Roberts Looneyversity, or heh, Texas A&M
You forgot Liberty University.
a010.gif
 
The True Believer fanatics have nowhere to go and are lashing out. Cognitive dissonance.

one poster accurately nailed your rants as "drunk posting"

truer words have never been spoken or in this case written

Believing in a cause or causes is not fanaticism

Martin Luther King was not a fanatic
Ghandi was not
Gay right advocates were not and are not fanatics
Bernie supporters want a better world not just for politicians who made $28MM last year, $10MM of which were made in speaking fees

Bernie supporters are not fanatics - they just want justice

have you heard of that concept ?
 
the same people who supported Obama are supporting Sanders. she has the same base of support she did 8 years ago plus the black voters who cant vote for Obama anymore. if anyone needed to be inspired it was the same hillary people 8 years ago that couldnt beat Obama then and wont defeat Trump now.

That's factually incorrect. Literally everyone I know who was for Obama back in 2008 is now firmly behind her. And so are multiple authors of articles on the Internet.
 
Just repeating the rhetoric your candidate says. Especially when you do it because there's actual substance to it, and it's not just empty slogans stating the obvious.

Next question?

Please.

What you repeat hardly consists of substance, you repeat the slander not any actual facts or positions.
 
It doesn't have to do with Hillary hate at all. Stick to actual issues instead of name calling and then we wouldn't have a problem.
 
Back
Top