The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Hypocritical Democrats - The Call to Violence

Compared to the amount of money that Republicans take in from Corporate Donors so that they can take it up the ass?

It'd like to see those comparative figures myself.

Here they are:

Top All-Time Donors, 1989-2010 by ranking.

Isn't it funny that the Top 16 are all STRONGLY supportive of Democrats.

So it's actually the Democrats who're taking it up the ass from Corporate Donors.
 
Asking someone about their political views or why they support a particular candidate is hardly baiting. The fact that you claim that Obama has nothing to run on in 2012, yet cannot give a minimal explanation of why you support Republicans or with which of their policies you agree is what is pathetic.

I redirect you to the Pledge to America, which I support every aspect of.
 
But yet The Top 10 PACS, MORE than MARGINALLY contribute to the GOP by a margin of more than 2 to 1.

Hysterical. :rolleyes:

But But But....

The #1 PAC contributor to Republicans, Honeywell, is actually #68 on the all-time donors list.

You're ignoring the fact that the top 2 all-time donors, support Democrats overwhelmingly. Just goes to show you that Democrats are in the pockets of Corporate Donors.

Dem % Repub %
1. ActBlue $55,059,076 99% - 0%
2. American Fedn of State, County & Municipal Employees $45,792,853 94% - 1%
 
I redirect you to the Pledge to America, which I support every aspect of.

SO you support the party that thinks Social Security is a ponzi scheme? Only after they lured millions of baby boomers into thinking it would be there for them. What a class act.

You support the party that believes homosexuality should be a crime?

You support the party that believes natural disasters are God's plagues upon the evil America?

You support the party of hate and separation.

You support the party that wants smaller federal government UNLESS they are enforcing the edicts of hate that your party believes in and says day to day on talk radio.

No the ludicrous portion is the fact that you continue to support that party when they have no issue driving the country off a cliff JUST because they lost power.

Self centered bunch of self serving fuckwads and you're right Son Of bitch is too weak to call them as a name.

They should all be hunted down and removed as a blight on America. Then possibly we can go forward without those that hate America blocking the progress of the people. Remember WE the People? They are coming.
 
But But But....

The #1 PAC contributor to Republicans, Honeywell, is actually #68 on the all-time donors list.

You're ignoring the fact that the top 2 all-time donors, support Democrats overwhelmingly. Just goes to show you that Democrats are in the pockets of Corporate Donors.

Dem % Repub %
1. ActBlue $55,059,076 99% - 0%
2. American Fedn of State, County & Municipal Employees $45,792,853 94% - 1%

So by your own admission here, you're acknowledging that both parties are bought and paid for by "special interests,' and we're just pissing on each others leg and saying that it's raining by splitting hairs on which donor is "taking away" the most from the American Electorate?

:D
 
UNION MEMBERS -- 2010


In 2010, the union membership rate--the percent of wage and salary workers who were
members of a union--was 11.9 percent, down from 12.3 percent a year earlier, the U.S.
Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. The number of wage and salary workers be-
longing to unions declined by 612,000 to 14.7 million. In 1983, the first year for
which comparable union data are available, the union membership rate was 20.1 per-
cent, and there were 17.7 million union workers.
 
So by your own admission here, you're acknowledging that both parties are bought and paid for by "special interests,' and we're just pissing on each others leg and saying that it's raining by splitting hairs on which donor is "taking away" the most from the American Electorate?

:D


That's the thing that we all seem to ignore. They are all bought and paid for. Good point!
 
UNION MEMBERS -- 2010


In 2010, the union membership rate--the percent of wage and salary workers who were
members of a union--was 11.9 percent, down from 12.3 percent a year earlier, the U.S.
Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. The number of wage and salary workers be-
longing to unions declined by 612,000 to 14.7 million. In 1983, the first year for
which comparable union data are available, the union membership rate was 20.1 per-
cent, and there were 17.7 million union workers.


The most important part you didn't mention is that there are now more union workers in government, than in private industry. 37% of government employees are unionized as opposed to about 7% in the private sector.
 
"Union thugs" = it's the new catch phrase used by the right wing in their little attempt to discredit the working class of America.

Variations:

thug
thugs
thuggery

Remember when using the word union in a sentence describing a member, attach the word thug. It brings an air of negativity and demonizaion to those being described.

---from the Right Wing Playbook.

Remember the old saying:

Republicans have slogans, Democrats have solutions.
 
"Union thugs" = it's the new catch phrase used by the right wing in their little attempt to discredit the working class of America.

Variations:

thug
thugs
thuggery

Remember when using the word union in a sentence describing a member, attach the word thug. It brings an air of negativity and demonizaion to those being described.

---from the Right Wing Playbook.

Remember the old saying:

Republicans have slogans, Democrats have solutions.

Hoffa isn't a member of the working class.

And are you honestly complaining about the word Thug? You just called people NAZIS in this thread.


Hoffa is right, they're sons of bitches. Roger Ailes is a son of a bitch. They're actually worse.... they're Nazis. Fox is Nazi propaganda.

There's actually a Wikipedia article for it. Reductio ad Hitlerum
 
What we have here is a Republican Thug® engaging in Republican Thuggery®.:rotflmao:
 
UNION MEMBERS -- 2010


In 2010, the union membership rate--the percent of wage and salary workers who were
members of a union--was 11.9 percent, down from 12.3 percent a year earlier, the U.S.
Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. The number of wage and salary workers be-
longing to unions declined by 612,000 to 14.7 million. In 1983, the first year for
which comparable union data are available, the union membership rate was 20.1 per-
cent, and there were 17.7 million union workers.

I dont know why you keep quoting these facts, as in my other thread it, it doesn't disqualify the point labor is trying to make.

At least Hoffa didnt bring a automatic rifle to a labor event or stomp an opponent at a political rally.


stomp.jpg
 
I dont know why you keep quoting these facts, as in my other thread it doesn't disqualify the point labor is trying to make.

At least Hoffa didnt bring a automatic rifle to a labor event or stomp an opponent at a political rally.

Like this?

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TGr8oYV50l8[/ame]
 
Fox news....enough said.

Thought the same thing. No doubt it was doctored like all their propaganda is.

It's sad that some people fall for their garbage. Goes to show you just how stupid they are. Republican Thugs® are easily manipulated.

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • preview_foxlies.png
    preview_foxlies.png
    12.8 KB · Views: 75
i guess a liberals call to violence would be a conservatives call to a hitman. just ask sarah palin.
giffords-crosshairs.jpg

you can swich parties at any time, just don't bring the hypocrisy with you.
 
Where is the evidence that Loughner was motivated by that map to shoot Giffords? In fact, his grudge against her went all the way back to 2007.

ef850_dnc-target.jpg
 
Back
Top