The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

INCEST!!!!!! Your thoughts!

  • Thread starter Thread starter BrandonSBCA
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Well if you ask me, I studied this in school in an anthropology class and in wester society it is quite damned, but in otehr cultures who are by the way few in actual times, it is a normal thing and very accepted, if you ask me, it depends on the person, and also id depends greatly on what input your nuclear family has given you. I for one, don't do it, but have relatives who are attractive and I acknowledge that they are, do I do anything sexual with them? No, because I was raised to think that having so many other people in the world I shouldn't have to settle with someone close who is already my relative, yet I don't actually think it is disgusting, I think it's just something some people do like and others don't.
 
I will not tell people its wrong (because its not), but its gross to me.

If you ask me I don't think it would be bad to practice with your father, since you are him, but your female family members I would never like to think of it happening.

I'm sorry I'm complicated, but no I do not like incest.
 
I think as long as it is consensual, same-sex, for experimentation purposes only, the age is relatively the same (+/- a year or so), and safer sex is practiced it will be fine.

I used to wish that I had a brother to play with (as I only have 2 sisters and that would be absolutely sick). Sadly I've never had a bro so I got over that pretty quickly.
 
Why is it alright to screw with your brother and not your sister? Is this warped gay thinking? Its OK if it is gay sex but straight sex? No way! where's the consistency?
 
Its wrong - and if you dont believe me then you can ask all the deformed babies whose parents were brother and sister.
 
Its wrong - and if you dont believe me then you can ask all the deformed babies whose parents were brother and sister.

Um... last time i checked if you are gay and you have incest, it ususally doesn't result in any offspring because... well... i hate to break it to you, but it takey a man and a women to have a baby.


P.S.
And it's also a myth that all children of incest are deformed, that's a myth perpetrated by the old thinking of religious dogma. Now it is true that children of incest are SLIGHTLY more likely to have genetic conditions OVER TIME. That's because you are limiting the gene pool of which the offspring is created. In the first few generations of incest you may not see any problems at all, but after successive generations you may see the effects of limited genetic pool.

Now don't get me wrong, i'm not in favor of heterosexual incest resulting in offspring at all. But it's not because it's taboo or because of some "ickiness" factor, it's because it does nothing at all to enhance the genetic stability of the species.
 
I do not like incest.

I am also wondering, why would the people living in glass houses be throwing stones around?

And Yup, I'd agree with Colemans on this one...

I think as long as it is consensual, same-sex, for experimentation purposes only, the age is relatively the same (+/- a year or so), and safer sex is practiced it will be fine.

I used to wish that I had a brother to play with (as I only have 2 sisters and that would be absolutely sick). Sadly I've never had a bro so I got over that pretty quickly.

I'd also agree with Provenlogic:

And it's also a myth that all children of incest are deformed, that's a myth perpetrated by the old thinking of religious dogma. Now it is true that children of incest are SLIGHTLY more likely to have genetic conditions OVER TIME. That's because you are limiting the gene pool of which the offspring is created. In the first few generations of incest you may not see any problems at all, but after successive generations you may see the effects of limited genetic pool.

But, I'd never agree to the idea that anyone should be allowed to take such SLIGHTLY higher risks, when it comes to having children.

SC
 
It's the height of disfunction in my opinion. You have to ask yourself what went wrong within that family to make them even contemplate sexual thoughts about their parents or siblings.

Fantasy is great when it's about consensual age gap relationships where the older partner might be considered your fathers age but I don't think it's ok to actively fantasize about your own father.

If we're talking about raping minors here (and you never made it clear from your first post what the question was exactly) then of course incest is not only the height of disfunction but it's sick and evil and the children involved will be damaged for life.
 
I'ts an even bigger taboo when there can be a child as a result that is why there is people who dont' view it as too bad in between men, but still add to the taboo of incest the taboo of homosexuality and you don't get anything nice.
 
Incest is wrong. Anyone who does it gay or straight, male or female.. is a sick person and should be ashamed of themselves. IMO
 
*sigh* wish i could say what i really wanna say without it getting deleted like it did the first time. i'm gonna try anyway...peto and others here seem to have a thing for incest....just look at the fucking fetish section for god's sake (and i swear peto has other threads about pedophilia floating around on JUB). something is just very wrong here. fantasizing is one thing (as sick as i may feel it is) but i tend to believe that open discussions like this (not to mention all the links to questionable age boys in the twinks section, which i've seen with my own eyes...i doubt those links were of kids who were 16 let alone 18!) encourage sicko pedophiles to think that "hey, i'm not alone. i guess if a lot of people do this, i can be proud too." it may very well encourage them to seek victims. anyway, this is simply a sick thread and there is no reason to frame the question the way it was framed unless it was a way excuse this behavior...the original post seems to me to suggest "hey, look how this famous composer thought it was normal"...this thread is nothing but a way to justify this repulsive behavior by showing it in historical context. we as a civilized people don't engage in behavior we used to engage in in the past, such as slavery, child labor etc., so just because some sicko wrote an operatta advocating child rape hundreds of years ago doesn't make it acceptable, now or even back then. peto, and i say this sincerely, i hope you're just trying to push buttons and aren't trying to "recruit" others. i really feel like i need a shower after reading your post. i'm taking this personally as someone who was molested by a family member for years on end and what peto and others who may fantasize about this kinda of evil don't understand is that it's not fun, it's disgusting, physically painful and fucks with your head for a long, long time. you guys are ruining a child so you can get your rocks off.

p.s. instead of cracking down on JUB members who insult each other or are rude and bitchy, i wish to god that the mods would crack down on all these pedo threads/stories etc. look around...they're everywhere. here, in fetish, the story section, health, male celebs...i think it's more important that JUB not be associated with pedo pervs than in regulating how rude people are to each other.
 
There are too many healthy, happy and well adjusted people in the world (heterosexual, homosexual, bisexual, multisexual, etc.....) who would make an excellent and fulfilling partner for anyone else, negating the need to be intimate with someone in the same family (wretch...wretch....) of any age, gender or sexual preference.
 
There are too many healthy, happy and well adjusted people in the world (heterosexual, homosexual, bisexual, multisexual, etc.....) who would make an excellent and fulfilling partner for anyone else, negating the need to be intimate with someone in the same family (wretch...wretch....) of any age, gender or sexual preference.


Well we can see the evolutionary why's and wherefore's:
If we have sex with familiars it is anti-economic.
Who's going to hunt for the big elk if everyone is being silly with each other? And big game hunting demands a lot of non-sexual attention.
But just because we're not mainly-hunters anymore has not reduced interdependencies. Quite the opposite.
 
My thoughts?
I don't even want to TALK to my brother...
:eek: :eek: :eek:
Oh God, I'm going to get sick again...

This looks like a good place for a VOMIT! smilie...
 
If it's hot, muscular, tight, gay brothers who close together in age and 18-25 years old, then that's OK. Otherwise, no deal.
 
It's interesting the amount of strenuous negativity in this thread and yet incest (both straight and gay -- dads doing sons, cousins doing each other, bothers doing each other) appears often in porn. There must be a lot of guys who are turned on by thought at least.

Fantasy is different than reality, of course.
 
Plenty of guys have jacked off with brothers and even sucked each other as teens before adulthood. I would not absolutely catagorize that as incest. If it goes beyond those things, I think its wrong.

Jacking off with brothers I don't really find all that bad.

Sucking each other off ... that is another story.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top