Rolyo85
Execuvette
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Posts
- 9,665
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
- Location
- Boystown, Chicago
- Website
- proconscience.blogspot.com
Mitch, I don't really have a problem with your perspective and most of what you say, but I can't agree with you on terminology and oversensitivity.
1. If you tell someone you are gay, they will NOT think you mean you're happy, and no amount of explanation that you mean happy will change that. In the same way, when we discuss behavior of gay males, "straight-acting" just has THAT meaning, and simply because you weren't aware of it (I can see how it might not be as popular a term in the UK as it is here), doesn't change that. You didn't know about it. Now you do. Let's move on, I suggest
2. "That's gay" is wrong. This is not about correctness and sensitivity, it's just not ok. I use it on occasion too, but it's different, because I am an obviously confident gay male, and any time I say it, there can't be any doubt that it's an intertextual joke. But the wide-spread use of the expression is not ok. Even for people who don't consciously hate gays, or maybe even like them, it still subconsciously reinforces the notion that "gay" is something to be laughed at, lame, wimpy, girly, pathetic. While as an eastern European I'd be the first to admit many things are geographical, this one absolutely isn't.
And in the end, some gay guys are just more feminine. It's not a statement, it's not culture, it's how they are. In previous decades and centuries they would hide it and mold themselves into stereotypes of masculinity as much as they could, but now they have the choice to be as they are. And while I am also attracted much more to masculinity (I am, after all, a child of the last two decades), there have been a lot of more feminine guys that I've found smoking hot. There is a difference between giving me feminine boyishness, and giving me girl. There are guys like that too. And they do nothing for me. But I am not ok with gay culture shunning them because they're not "chill" and "masc" enough...
1. If you tell someone you are gay, they will NOT think you mean you're happy, and no amount of explanation that you mean happy will change that. In the same way, when we discuss behavior of gay males, "straight-acting" just has THAT meaning, and simply because you weren't aware of it (I can see how it might not be as popular a term in the UK as it is here), doesn't change that. You didn't know about it. Now you do. Let's move on, I suggest
2. "That's gay" is wrong. This is not about correctness and sensitivity, it's just not ok. I use it on occasion too, but it's different, because I am an obviously confident gay male, and any time I say it, there can't be any doubt that it's an intertextual joke. But the wide-spread use of the expression is not ok. Even for people who don't consciously hate gays, or maybe even like them, it still subconsciously reinforces the notion that "gay" is something to be laughed at, lame, wimpy, girly, pathetic. While as an eastern European I'd be the first to admit many things are geographical, this one absolutely isn't.
And in the end, some gay guys are just more feminine. It's not a statement, it's not culture, it's how they are. In previous decades and centuries they would hide it and mold themselves into stereotypes of masculinity as much as they could, but now they have the choice to be as they are. And while I am also attracted much more to masculinity (I am, after all, a child of the last two decades), there have been a lot of more feminine guys that I've found smoking hot. There is a difference between giving me feminine boyishness, and giving me girl. There are guys like that too. And they do nothing for me. But I am not ok with gay culture shunning them because they're not "chill" and "masc" enough...









