Nope, most likely nature's influence, your obscenities aside.
To have common genetic traits is the very definition of race. Unfortunately, that's been obscured in the recent past by a lot of circumlocution. There is in fact such a thing as genetic race.
Eyes, noses, hair, body types, fingernails, feet, hands, pigmentaion, eye color, ear shapes, and all sorts of phenotypic traits predominate. Does every single member of the race have the same traits to the same degree? Nope. But as a population, they are there in common by definition.
So, if almond-shaped or round eyes are unattractive to you, they are in fact unattractive to you. If you've never met or heard of a race, you may still find those people attractive or not.
What you always seem to cite are gay dating apps, which, by definition, are disproportionately peopled by a subgroup of gay men who objectify sex and relationships in terms reminiscent of car shopping. "I want a sports car." "I want leather seats."
Yet, as I remember, straight friends had no such shopping list when they were finding partners. They began dating and went out with the gals they found funny, cute, interesting, challenging, smart, athletic, or whatever. I never once heard one say, "I'd never date a brunette," nor did I hear one say, "Latinas need not apply." They didn't see dating that way. They weren't shopping for meat.
The dating apps DO NOT represent gay men, only a mercenary subset. Their race preferences are no more or less offensive than Cormac's "no fats, no fems, etc."
Grindr may be your reality, but it's a very limited one.
