- Joined
- Jan 15, 2006
- Posts
- 122,824
- Reaction score
- 4,067
- Points
- 113
Unproven charge, you mean. The charge is well-documented in the reports cited in this thread. The mechanisms by which voting equipment ensures accuracy should be transparent and readily understood by the public. Anyone running an election should be able to understand that.
Yes. Changing the software within mere weeks of the voting is more than suspicious; not letting anyone else vet it is... suggestive of conspiracy.





























