R
RandomAccess
Guest
^ You know, I always did like you, Nishin! And here's another reason why: you cut-right-through the BS!
You're okay in my book! 
You're okay in my book! To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.
You're okay in my book! But it surely demonstrates disrespect, maybe I'm too "old-school" or something but I do feel slightly offended when someone supposedly educated seemingly considers his audience unworthy of bothering using proper grammar and spelling.
Now looking at said substance, I refuse your use of words such as "developed" ( " fill in the blank ............... " is not something I'd call "developed") or "very mature" in regards to Chance1's opinions... the latter being, in fact, often based on a strange, delusional and unrealistic vision of the world and system of values.
In example, popularity seems to be the ultimate value and guarantee of credibility in his eyes... FOX News/O' Reilly are good and accurate because of good audience rates (no comments); John McCain is proved a great man because he gets a 5 points difference in polls (remember Hitler was elected democratically... ); US is the best country to live in because a lot of immigrants emigrate there (using this logic Pakistan and Iran, which are the territories that provide asylum to most people from outside their borders, are the best places to live, human-rights-wise !!) ...
What maturity do you see there?

why? cuz McCain is a great man
Nope... because he's a WHITE male.
Lets drop the BS... if Obama was a white man from a red state or a purple state... McCain wouldn't have a prayer in this election. But one of the issues that Obama will face in this election is race. That's something that you can't just ignore.. it is a HUGE factor. If Hillary was the one facing McCain.. it would be her gender that would be the issue, and the problems election a woman to lead the country in the time of war.
But a white southern male democrat could already have a transition team in place.

I'm sorry this video is so long (9:29) but it's a "must-see" to help you decide Senator McCain's supposed "greatness." The key and most telling point is made at 9:01.
But it surely demonstrates disrespect, maybe I'm too "old-school" or something but I do feel slightly offended when someone supposedly educated seemingly considers his audience unworthy of bothering using proper grammar and spelling.
John McCain is proved a great man because he gets a 5 points difference in polls (remember Hitler was elected democratically... ); US is the best country to live in because a lot of immigrants emigrate there (using this logic Pakistan and Iran, which are the territories that provide asylum to most people from outside their borders, are the best places to live, human-rights-wise !!) ...
What maturity do you see there?

Oh Chance your thread titles read like a veritable McCain Campaign talking point![]()

[McCain] is a man who doesn't even know what the acronym LGBT stands for. He also doesn't really believe in gay adoption, supports a ban on gays in the military, is worried if his clothing looks too gay, isn't sure if condoms stop the spread of HIV, thinks same-sex marriage ceremonies are okay as long as they're just pretend, and has promised right-wing religious groups that he'll start speaking out more vocally against LGBT causes.
It's astonishing that some gays (14% according to this poll) will not only support him, but fund his campaign.
http://www.towleroad.com/2008/08/mccain-couldnt.html
based on my understanding of the Christian faith, that's not, not, N-O-T, not the type of expression that a presidential candidate, or anyone for that matter who is a follower of the Christian faith, ought to make
^ For those who can stomach even listening to him, here's that tool Hannity trying to make out that McCain's adultery is of a different quality than Edwards'. Extenuating circumstances. What a hoot.
I do have to commend McCain for his brilliant reference, in his Saddleback interview, of oil dependence as "the biggest transfer of wealth in history". That's one of those light-bulb phrases that so neatly defines an issue in a powerful way. I think he stole it from the Washington Post, who coined it first - but it is such a stark, succinct analysis of why energy dependence is so important. Considering the right wing's fear of wealth redistribution, it was the perfect forum to recycle this concept into a new context, to help defend his "flip-flop" on off-shore drilling.
McCain did well at Saddleback. The only thing that irked me was his sticky-sweet, dated, awkward use of "my friends..." over and over every time he wanted to signal that a boiler-plate platitude was coming. Felt very fake, scripted and condescending.
1. John McCain voted against establishing a national holiday in honor of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Now he says his position has "evolved," yet he's continued to oppose key civil rights laws.1
• Obama says he "strongly supports the principle of network neutrality to preserve the benefits of open competition on the Internet." McCain "does not believe in prescriptive regulation like 'Net-neutrality." (Technically the two statements aren't at odds because one politico is talking about broad principles, but it's pretty clear where they're going. Our Voters' Guide has more details.)
In this article, McCain's campaign releases his policy on technology. A couple of things to note here for a man who has openly admitted to being computer illiterate:
1. Net Neutrality - For the future of a free-thinking internet, Net Neutrality is critical to keeping government/corporate out of the web. Basically, telecommunication companies like Comcast and others want to create a tiered internet. Websites that pay premiums to the companies will receive full bandwidth access to consumers, while less desired websites will receive "dial-up" access, essentially crippling the internet to the haves and have nots. JustusBoys, for example, would have to pay premiums to telecommunication companies just to receive the normal bandwidth we all enjoy now. Corporate websites thrive, while smaller sites suffer. It would further exasperate the Digital Divide by providing unequal internet access to all users. McCain opposes Net Neutrality while Obama supports it. Clearly, the Republican choice is wrong here.
