The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Just for fun post a non-porn pic.

Taken today:
SAM_2067.JPG

Once you hear a Deltic at full cry, it's not easily forgotten.
 
^ Wow, even places like Carbondale had ways to get people around on public transit.

How far we have fallen. (Sic transit gloria??)

Oh, but that was 1922: today, on the contrary, even the rottenest of losers can afford some sort of private car :rolleyes:
 
Oh, but that was 1922: today, on the contrary, even the rottenest of losers can afford some sort of private car :rolleyes:

Not so. It's bizarre, but government programs dictate the maximum value of an automobile people getting assistance can own, and the value is low -- under $1k. The catch is that those are the very automobiles most expensive in general to run, because they're old and falling apart, and burn a lot of gas. The result is that many people on government assistance can't have an automobile because they can't afford one that is worth so little.

That's where the aim should have been for the program for getting rid of clunkers; they should have raised the maximum value of an auto for people on assistance to $2500, and bought up all those pieces of crap which are also rather dangerous on the roads.
Of course, that would make too much sense.
 
Not so. It's bizarre, but government programs dictate the maximum value of an automobile people getting assistance can own, and the value is low -- under $1k. The catch is that those are the very automobiles most expensive in general to run, because they're old and falling apart, and burn a lot of gas. The result is that many people on government assistance can't have an automobile because they can't afford one that is worth so little.

That's where the aim should have been for the program for getting rid of clunkers; they should have raised the maximum value of an auto for people on assistance to $2500, and bought up all those pieces of crap which are also rather dangerous on the roads.
Of course, that would make too much sense.

I wrote about owning not about driving :cool: :mrgreen: :rolleyes:
 
Back
Top