Frankly I saw Keith O
and just read Schieffer
and it's apples and oranges - their messages that is
then there is the 2 men's histories
Keith O is pure Bush bashing
Schieffer is all class - who is liberal leaning but speaks fairly and w/o emotion, venom and partisanship
but that's me
I agree that Schieffer delivers his message with more class, but in terms of context, how is the message the Olbermann delivers apples compared to the oranges message that Schieffer delivers.
In your opinion?
For me, Schieffer is talking about the real sacrifice, and Olbermann...who to my knowledge...is just NOW acknowledging...how are the two messages any different?
Well besides the fact that Schieffer said about the same thing a couple of weeks ago, that Olbermann pontificated about in more paragraphs?


































