I believe, and I say this carefully and with due respect, that he is twink minded. I of course, am far from twinkish by ANY definition of the word and stretch of the imagination.
That said, why Keeland? Nor is the question a judgmental one, just curious as to your what parameters you're using in this particular match.
THAT said, there are a few here on JUB with whom I would not mind spending time with the first order of business being establishing what type of clickage there is. There's lots of attractive men here on JUB of all ages and types, but I ain't just hoppin' in the sack without there more going on.
However, I'd be lying if I didn't say that if I were younger, the rules of engagement could be quite different.
There, I said it, and I'm glad.
How do you fellas know who likes bears, who likes twinks, who likes leather guys, and whatnot? I can't tell. Last time that I paired guys up, I put lots of bottoms w/ other bottoms, or so they told me via PM that they needed someone else b/c they wanted to bottom only (which is a hoot b/c you'd think my silly pairings were set in stone as the JUB gospel).
To be honest, I think of you guys like brothers, and I picture you in loving relationships, not on your backs w/ your ankles in the air getting pounded. I suppose that's the girl in me too. So, I think more of who would be compatable over the long haul. Of course, I love sex, sex is great, and I realize it's important in a relationship. Anyway, you prefer to bottom, and I could've sworn that either Keeland was versatile or he preferred to top. That takes care of the fucking. You'll have to work out whether you're both into vanilla or kinky stuff on your own.
Back then, some guys were excited about their pairings, but didn't like the fact that I had them going through life w/ a guy across the country. So, I realized that geography is important. I personally only want to date guys who are my age or older; the younger crowd just seems so young. I tend to forget that other people love youth. So, I usually picture people w/ other fellas in their own age bracket. Oh, and I always make the bi guys gay. (Not that I have a problem w/ bi guys, I just picture them w/ men rather than women.)
So why Keeland? Well, you have the geography down and I think you're compatable in the sack. I think you're more laid back and he's a bit more uptight, so you'd be good together. I also think Keeland would be good w/ kids and you have Narny et. al. You both seem to value faithfulness and loyalty and you're both anti-church/religion. I mean, you can't have an atheist and a Christian together. Not usually anyway. You also both have a wicked sense of humor that is sometimes off beat.
Maybe women look for different things than gay men b/c I consider a lot of folks on here really great catches; yet, they're still single. Then again, most of my female friends are dating or married to assholes, and it seems like the assholes on JUB are all taken.
Oh, and FG, bitch boom! I didn't mean to hijack your thread. I couldn't afford to make my own thread. It's not recession proof.