The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Mueller Submits his Report.

^ Thanks. I had no idea. I just thought Trump was keeping him away from cameras and microphones.
 
^ Indeed. If he doesn't pop his own clogs, someone will pop the for him.
 
Returnofbigchicken said:
By the time Trump leaves office in January 2025... Trump will never see a jail cell.
Click to expand...
He'll be too old, and the combination of that and a residue of "executive privilege" (not in the usual sense, but in the same sense as "white privilege" when talking about racial disparities in law enforcement) will keep him legally "clean." The sum of too old, ex-presidential privilege (my rename of executive privilege), and white privilege, adds up to something almost invincible.
 
^ I don't know. Bill Cosby thought he would never see the inside of a jail cell. Neither his age nor his blindness could keep him out of it. Trump's stupidity will not even come into question as a consideration during sentencing.
 
There you go.

We all thought this was dead and buried.

But maybe it is not.

Eventually this will end up at the Supreme Court.

A federal judge issued an order on Thursday for the Justice Department to release to the court an unredacted version of the Mueller Report....

D.C. District Judge Reggie Walton also sharply criticized Attorney General William Barr, accusing him of making "misleading public statements" in advance of the release of the partially redacted version of the full report in April of 2019.
Click to expand...

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...ed-report-criticizes-william-barr/4968883002/
 
^ Thank goodness. Plus Judge Walton is a Republican appointed under George W Bush as well, he's no liberal softie that Trump and his flunkies can easily dismiss as biased.
 
Sausy said:
^ Thank goodness. Plus Judge Walton is a Republican appointed under George W Bush as well, he's no liberal softie that Trump and his flunkies can easily dismiss as biased.
Click to expand...

Of course he is, that's exactly what they'll say, and the stupid and the bigoted crazies who support the orange horror will happily lap it up.

Too little too late. None of them are going to care if the report comes out in full and directly condemns Trump and all of his brood. His base won't believe anything that they don't want to believe. They have completely rejected facts.
 
^At this point in time, while there are some who voted for Trump who vow they will never repeat that terrible mistake again, it's clear that for about 40% of the people, he's their guy whether because they think the economy is still functioning well and they like his results, if not always his methods(though a hell of a lot of them do) or they are motivated by bigotry and hatred and like that about Trump just fine. We won't bring them around no matter what, and yes they will be thoroughly unimpressed about this judge's findings. We have to get beyond them and just get enough people together this November to vote out the orange piece of shit out.
 
I agreed, time to vote the fuckers out, this might help, but probably not. On the other hand, the Burisma thingy probably won't hurt as much as the Cheeto Commander would like, since it's also been exhaustively hashed over already.
 
So does that mean they have to comply or will the Administration take it to the Supreme Court for the final word?
 
TX-Beau said:
Make a wild guess.
Click to expand...
Well then, people shouldn't get too happy. Some very key decisions then for the Supreme Court by this June(though, of course, not going to decide on the ACA until the end of next term, well after the election) but I wouldn't get my hopes up Chief Justice Roberts does the right thing, especially if Trump somehow still wins and will expect the Court to do his bidding... lest he unloads his most vicious Twitter bile on Roberts after Roberts upheld the ACA last time and pushed back against Trump's argument that there are Obama judges and intimating judges are first and foremost political.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top