Myers-Briggs Personality

[JasunStrikesBack]

Your Type is
ENFP
Extraverted Intuitive Feeling Perceiving
Strength of the preferences %
56 25 62 44


Hardly. I'm about 100% extrovert and 75% intuitive.

Oh well.

 

[gaypiper]

we clergy all have to take Myers-Briggs tests as part of our formation... very revealing.

 

[gaypiper]

The trouble with this test is that it can only come to its conclusions based on how you are actually feeling in the moment. If I'm feeling perky, the result will likely be different from the way it comes out if I'm feeling quiet, still or depressed. In seminary, I was pegged as an ENFP. This time, I come out as an INFJ!

 

[thermodynamics]

I'm an interesting combination of INTJ/INFJ. NT when it comes to things, NF when it comes to close relationships.

 

[JasunStrikesBack]

OK, the more I read... yeah.... EIFP is about right.

 

[TheFireGod]

 

[JayHawk]

Your Type is : ENFJ
Extraverted 11%
Intuitive 25%
Feeling 12%
Judging 44%

Idealist Portrait of the Teacher

Go to Kersey or to the link below and read about the type.... I think that gives much more of a window on people

http://typelogic.com/enfj.html

as far as political identity being defined in part by personality type... well you may have something:

Famous ENFJs:
David, King of Israel
U.S. Presidents:
Abraham Lincoln
Ronald Reagan
Barack Obama

^^ all staunch conservatives

 

[JayHawk]

Meh.... those cruisers bemoaning the Carnival decision to keep them aboard should have travelled up the Mexican coast if they were worried about conditions on the ship.

The original plan to bus them was priceless.

I havent been to TJ in years. Dont wanna die a white man caught in an unnecessary drug war cross fire.

I digress.

 

[Kulindahr]

Today:

I N T J
44 / 62 / 38 / 33


But from my next to last year at OSU:

I N F P
56 / 38 / 25 / 11


And when starting OSU:

E N T J
44 / 75 / 25 / 56



I noticed as I went through it that my answers would be different when there's sunshine than when the world is gray, and different when I have bucks to spend than when I don't.

So plainly this doesn't measure any consistent, foundational personality type. My scores above are spaced by roughly a decade between each, so I can see changes across that period of time -- but from extrovert to intro? and what's with the flip from 'thinking' to 'feeling' and back? or 'judgment' to 'perception' and back?

 

[JayHawk]

Yeah i was a thinker before in a test taken about tens years ago at a leadership conference. I think in part some of the answers change as i have been placed in different leadership positions. Similar to youngins being liberal when young and idealistic and becoming more conservative as the responsibilities of time and requirements of life take hold.

 

[TheFireGod]

Yeah i was a thinker before in a test taken about tens years ago at a leadership conference. I think in part some of the answers change as i have been placed in different leadership positions. Similar to youngins being liberal when young and idealistic and becoming more conservative as the responsibilities of time and requirements of life take hold.

If you mean the Liberalism of old, as in individual freedoms and the free market... you know... laisse-faire and non-intervention unless directly being harmed; then yes I will be an idealist.

For now I don't see myself as Conservative, which is using the tired (and potentially) outdated methods and of tradition. Conservatism doesn't always mean freedom of the individual and of the markets. Yeah, I don't do the "end justifies the means" thing Conservatism (especially Neoconservatism) nowadays does.

 

[maxpowr9]

I know I'm an INTj. However, I have a 'soft j' (thus the lower case) that sometimes crosses over into 'p' territory. From what a guidance councilor told me once after taking the test, she said that nearly all people have some soft variables (usually the 2nd and 4th letters) that will change with your moods but usually lean in one direction.

 

[JayHawk]

If you mean the Liberalism of old, as in individual freedoms and the free market... you know... laisse-faire and non-intervention unless directly being harmed; then yes I will be an idealist.

For now I don't see myself as Conservative, which is using the tired (and potentially) outdated methods and of tradition. Conservatism doesn't always mean freedom of the individual and of the markets. Yeah, I don't do the "end justifies the means" thing Conservatism (especially Neoconservatism) nowadays does.

Yeah well the black and white that people conveniently place posters into around here is definitely not my position on anything.

I wish there was a party that wanted to slash spending, extend gay rights, invest into the infrastructure of the united states, provide health care cost reform, maintain a strong efficient military, legalize marijuana, leave choice to women on abortion where it belongs and reform our govt so the politicians are required to serve the people and not their political or corporate daddies....

I think most Americans if thoroughly informed on each of these issues would support such a party overwhelmingly.

 

[Kulindahr]

I know I'm an INTj. However, I have a 'soft j' (thus the lower case) that sometimes crosses over into 'p' territory. From what a guidance councilor told me once after taking the test, she said that nearly all people have some soft variables (usually the 2nd and 4th letters) that will change with your moods but usually lean in one direction.

Interesting. I'm an N in all three of those tests, and I bet I would be regardless of sunshine or clouds.

I wish there was a party that wanted to slash spending, extend gay rights, invest into the infrastructure of the united states, provide health care cost reform, maintain a strong efficient military, legalize marijuana, leave choice to women on abortion where it belongs and reform our govt so the politicians are required to serve the people and not their political or corporate daddies....

I think most Americans if thoroughly informed on each of these issues would support such a party overwhelmingly.

That's a dead-on description of the "Liberty Party" many libertarians want to form -- libertarian at the core, but recognizing that just as the individual rights our Founding Fathers rose up to defend took several hundred years to awaken and take hold, any program of returning our government to upholding those rights has to take time.

An article in one of the libertarian mags I used to get opined that to launch the Liberty Party would require a score of U.S. Senators and four-score Representatives committed to 'flip' all at once, and at least a hundred candidates ready for the next election, with heavy funding in place.
Ivory-tower Libertarians would be shown the door.

 

[JayHawk]

Unfortunately, the very last line where I would extract the power game from public service would mean no serving politician would 'flip' into a powerless servant of the public. the megalomaniac requirement to serve in office currently is completely incompatible with a life of service.

 

[Supersix]

Home


Jung Marriage Test


Try free demo


Entrepreneur Test
for Small Business


Try free demo


Risk Attitudes
Profiler


Try free demo
Risk profiles of famous personalities

Visionary Test


Assertiveness Test


Morals Test


Role Model Profiler


Political Performance
Indicator


Your Type is
ISFJ
Introverted Sensing Feeling Judging
Strength of the preferences %
22 25 12 1


ISFJ type description by D.Keirsey
ISFJ Identify Your Career with Jung Career Indicator™ ISFJ Famous Personalities
ISFJ type description by J. Butt and M.M. Heiss




Qualitative analysis of your type formula

You are:
slightly expressed introvert

moderately expressed sensing personality

slightly expressed feeling personality

slightly expressed judging personality

Hmm, very interesting, it seems quite accurate. The links about romance and work are pretty damn close, too. Thanks for putting this on, I enjoyed this!

 

[shainski]

I took that test 15 or so years ago. I had a really hard time with a whole section of the test - that i wouldn't answer the same way if i took the same test immediately after taking it.

It went something like this:

1) What word do you like better?

a) soft b) cuddly c) downy d) malleable

since it is so long ago, i am giving you the question and answer from memory. But there were some 25-30 questions in a row like that.

And i'm thinking - I don't like any word better. It would totally depend on what i was talking about. Would i be describing a person, or a kitten or stuffed animal.

I was discussing this with a friend and she was amazed that i couldn't answer the question. And she would say the words like "sofffft", "cuuuudddddllly", etc - giving the words themselves some kind of feeling.

I though - well, i guess our brains can works so differently.

But if i took that test immediately again, (unless i recalled what i had put down), i would likely have answered those 25-30 questions totally randomly.

I don't remember my type - or its strength. i'll have to dig that up sometime.

 

[Kulindahr]

I took that test 15 or so years ago. I had a really hard time with a whole section of the test - that i wouldn't answer the same way if i took the same test immediately after taking it.

It went something like this:

1) What word do you like better?

a) soft b) cuddly c) downy d) malleable

since it is so long ago, i am giving you the question and answer from memory. But there were some 25-30 questions in a row like that.

And i'm thinking - I don't like any word better. It would totally depend on what i was talking about. Would i be describing a person, or a kitten or stuffed animal.

I was discussing this with a friend and she was amazed that i couldn't answer the question. And she would say the words like "sofffft", "cuuuudddddllly", etc - giving the words themselves some kind of feeling.

I though - well, i guess our brains can works so differently.

But if i took that test immediately again, (unless i recalled what i had put down), i would likely have answered those 25-30 questions totally randomly.

I don't remember my type - or its strength. i'll have to dig that up sometime.

My psychologist has said that one extremely important aspect that tests like this don't take into account is how long it takes to answer each question.

 

[Kulindahr]

I see a lot of INTJs here. You guys are my mirror image, except you think with your head, and I think with my heart. (Doggone it!) INTJs usually tend to be righties, while INFJs tend to be lefties.

The biggest thing we have in common is a ruggedly independent nature. I think that's why you see Kulin and others in a third party, and someone like me who dislikes both parties to some extent. Neither profile likes other people to tell them how to think.

@Kulindahr:

INFP doesn't fit you at all. My cousin is an INFP, and you're nothing like that except for the fact that you're a nudist. However, INTJ does seem to fit you, in my humble opinion.

Thing about INTJs? They have the capacity to be either great leaders, or great villains. The best, or the worst. Yin vs. yang. Use your talents wisely, good citizens.

I read the different descriptions, and I see myself in all three of those I listed in my post above -- but at different times.

It's why I seem like more than one person to some friends, I guess. The hypo-manic from sunshine Kuli at the volunteer conservation and safety project is outgoing, inspiring. The Kuli facing dealing with budget problems for that same project is coolly analytical and not terribly caring about the human side of things.

 

[maxpowr9]

I see a lot of INTJs here. You guys are my mirror image, except you think with your head, and I think with my heart. (Doggone it!) INTJs usually tend to be righties, while INFJs tend to be lefties.


Thing about INTJs? They have the capacity to be either great leaders, or great villains. The best, or the worst. Yin vs. yang. Use your talents wisely, good citizens.

INTJs are libertarians at heart not right. Even psych studies show that INTJs are the least spiritual of any of the 16 classes. We (INTJs) ruthlessly apply the question "Does it work?" to everything we do. That's why most INTJs don't really believe in religion because most of the stories in religious texts seem far-fetched at best but we can take the moral lessons in them.