- Joined
- Jan 15, 2006
- Posts
- 123,002
- Reaction score
- 4,578
- Points
- 113
Libertarians tend to NOT want to invest in the infrastructure of the US. They would rather leave infrastructure to the private sector, or to local government if to any government.
Not an inconsequential consideration, when you consider how vast the infrastructure of the country is and how much it would cost to maintain/expand it.
And libertarians who think the highway system should be auctioned off in chunks wouldn't be welcome.
Something a lot of libertarians are obtuse regarding is that sudden social upheavals are not good for liberty. The American Revolution is no a good example of how social upheavals play out; the Russian and French revolutions are far better. So any libertarian who is more than a shriveled selfish objectivist and has any grasp of history is going to be a gradualist. If by some wild chance a Liberty Party revolution put an LP president and Congress in D.C., you'd be almost certain to see a bill signing over any portions of the federal highway system that are currently paid for by tolls, to private entities, but there'd be a good chance that they would be designated as NfP. There'd likely be a study set up to see what other sections might be altered to run the same way, but you wouldn't see a stampede to privatize the whole mess.
In fact there's a fairly serious contingent of "constitutional libertarians", many of whom would argue that under the Constitution's commerce clause, a basic system of highways is authorized (though without that conferring any authority to dictate anything about what rides on those highways).

















