The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Myers-Briggs Personality

Libertarians tend to NOT want to invest in the infrastructure of the US. They would rather leave infrastructure to the private sector, or to local government if to any government.

Not an inconsequential consideration, when you consider how vast the infrastructure of the country is and how much it would cost to maintain/expand it.

And libertarians who think the highway system should be auctioned off in chunks wouldn't be welcome.

Something a lot of libertarians are obtuse regarding is that sudden social upheavals are not good for liberty. The American Revolution is no a good example of how social upheavals play out; the Russian and French revolutions are far better. So any libertarian who is more than a shriveled selfish objectivist and has any grasp of history is going to be a gradualist. If by some wild chance a Liberty Party revolution put an LP president and Congress in D.C., you'd be almost certain to see a bill signing over any portions of the federal highway system that are currently paid for by tolls, to private entities, but there'd be a good chance that they would be designated as NfP. There'd likely be a study set up to see what other sections might be altered to run the same way, but you wouldn't see a stampede to privatize the whole mess.

In fact there's a fairly serious contingent of "constitutional libertarians", many of whom would argue that under the Constitution's commerce clause, a basic system of highways is authorized (though without that conferring any authority to dictate anything about what rides on those highways).
 
Your Type is

INFJ

Introverted 22
Intuitive 75
Feeling 38
Judging 22

Though I often score inconsistently in these types of tests, as I over-think the questions. Fore example:

You feel involved when watching TV soaps​

I could answer 'yes' or 'no' to this, and usually feel frustrated and confused by this type of question. "Soaps" are a genre of TV show I find idiotic at best, so the most accurate answer is "no". However this is the only question on TV, and for the shows I do watch, I watch them because I find them engaging and like to discuss them a lot, so if they meant "You feel involved in TV shows" I would answer "yes".

More often than not I give up on surveys for this very reason!
 
ENTJ. It appears I'm one of the few extroverted person on here.
Field marshal here.
 
Nice to meet you, Woofy. I'm an INFJ, too, and we're supposed to be the rarest ones, although this is disputed. (FYI, my Introversion scale is 100%. Yikes!)

If you'd like to join a group of JustUsINFJs, please let me know. There's at least one other prominent gay man who posts.

Am I prominent? I was just called a "pillar of the community" this weekend.. this is getting to my head ;-)

Hmm, if I am really a INFJ (that test seemed simplistic), I don't know what that means in terms of talking with other INFJers... send me the link, I can read what's there and see.
 
There was a thread like this in June, I think.
I turned out to be ISFJ

We are lucky that Protectors make up as much as ten percent the population, because their primary interest is in the safety and security of those they care about - their family, their circle of friends, their students, their patients, their boss, their fellow-workers, or their employees. Protectors have an extraordinary sense of loyalty and responsibility in their makeup, and seem fulfilled in the degree they can shield others from the dirt and dangers of the world. Speculating and experimenting do not intrigue Protectors, who prefer to make do with time-honored and time-tested products and procedures rather than change to new. At work Protectors are seldom happy in situations where the rules are constantly changing, or where long-established ways of doing things are not respected. For their part, Protectors value tradition, both in the culture and in their family. Protectors believe deeply in the stability of social ranking conferred by birth, titles, offices, and credentials. And they cherish family history and enjoy caring for family property, from houses to heirlooms.

Wanting to be of service to others, Protectors find great satisfaction in assisting the downtrodden, and can deal with disability and neediness in others better than any other type. They are not as outgoing and talkative as the Provider Guardians [ESFJs], and their shyness is often misjudged as stiffness, even coldness, when in truth Protectors are warm-hearted and sympathetic, giving happily of themselves to those in need.

Their reserve ought really to be seen as an expression of their sincerity and seriousness of purpose. The most diligent of all the types, Protectors are willing to work long, hard hours quietly doing all the thankless jobs that others manage to avoid. Protectors are quite happy working alone; in fact, in positions of authority they may try to do everything themselves rather than direct others to get the job done. Thoroughness and frugality are also virtues for them. When Protectors undertake a task, they will complete it if humanly possible. They also know better than any other type the value of a dollar, and they abhor the squandering or misuse of money. To save, to put something aside against an unpredictable future, to prepare for emergencies-these are actions near and dear to the Protector's heart. For all these reasons, Protectors are frequently overworked, just as they are frequently misunderstood and undervalued. Their contributions, and also their economies, are often taken for granted, and they rarely get the gratitude they deserve.

Mother Teresa, George H.W. Bush, Jimmy Stewart, and Tsar Nicholas II are examples of Protector Guardian style.
 
I like the format, Woofy.

It did take some time to get used to, but I've found that gmail groups the conversations automatically, based on topic.

I wish I could find other email lists, but the format seems obsolete.

It would be trivial for me to setup a rule on my Exchange account to have all emails from a list sort to a specific folder, I already do for the two lists I have to be on. I just find it a very poor way to have communal discussions, and the last thing I want is to add traffic to my email. I get up 100 emails/day already during the busy season (not including spam, that seldom makes it to my inbox).
 
BTW, I think a slip of the pen might have been made, because UNTJ doesn't exist as a classification. Were you referring to INTJ instead?

Oops, yes, INTJ. Multitasking right now, with predictable results ;-)

From that brief chat with by buddy, the F/T difference is not unusual, depending on mindset when taking the test and the precise wording of the questions.

Reading descriptions of INFJ, the type fits me pretty damned well. But if I think about work, health & safety, or non-personal decisions then INTJ seems nearly as good a fit.
 
INFJ, here.

Though I seem to remember taking the test and getting different results...
 
^ Johann, to be honest, I think I may have scored INTJ before, but the questions can be answered either way, in some cases, depending on one's mood or understanding of the question...

Anyway, we're teammates tonight! :-)
 
@Kulindahr.

I read someplace that the free, online tests are accurate only about 70% of the time. Apparently, you're one of the other 30%.

You're assuming that it means 70% v 30% of the people.

From my knowledge and experience of mood disorders, I wouldn't be surprised if I actually am switching.
 
I don't know, Kulindahr. I just can't see you as in INFJ, but of course I could be wrong.

Most INFJs have a tendency to believe in one aspect of the paranormal or the other. (There are even a couple of witches on the email list.) You just wouldn't seem to be the type to believe in any of that "nonsense". Moreover, they're overwhelmingly leftists, although there is a single supply-sider. (Good heavens! I thought that was discredited decades ago.)

Or, of course, maybe you're right. Maybe your profile changes with the moods. I don't know enough about it to be able to tell.

They say that a complete test, administered by a professional, is necessary to know. These tests take a couple of hours....

Just thinking about this in conjunction with my conservation project.... One of my main supporters, who lives right across the road from a major portion of the effort, has more than once asked me "what happened to the guy who was working there last week?" I can flip from treating the whole thing as a work of art and making decisions on the basis of the aesthetics to doing nothing at all without a tape measure, stakes and string, and estimates of volume of loose material farther up the slope, between sticking in plants where they "feel" right to sorting out what seedlings I have and arranging them to give an even representation across the area I'm tackling, from working at whatever sort of jumps out at me to marking out plans according to expected weather and being ready for it.

Anyway, I'm emailing about doing a full-length test, which is what my earlier (and differing) tests were.
 
Your Type is
ESFJ
Extraverted Sensing Feeling Judging
Strength of the preferences %
67 1 25 33


ESFJ type description by D.Keirsey
ESFJ Identify Your Career with Jung Career Indicator™ ESFJ Famous Personalities
ESFJ type description by J. Butt and M.M. Heiss




Qualitative analysis of your type formula

You are:
distinctively expressed extravert

slightly expressed sensing personality

moderately expressed feeling personality

moderately expressed judging personality
 
Back
Top