The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Obama Supporters Boo Sheila Jackson Lee in TX

Obama supporters major claim is that he inspires change.

You say he didn't inspire the response Sheila Jackson Lee got.

So okay, what change has Obama inspired?

Earth to Nick! Earth to Nick!

Like I said. Someone is living on their own separate planet if they are trying to make a desperate correlation about someone being booed and Obama making "change" a part of his campaign theme. Apparently, nobody else is following your logic.
 
Actually, it's not a silly request it's a stupid request. No man has ever set foot on Mars, let alone planted a flag there, so it shows blatant ignorance on the part of someone sitting on the House Science Committee. This is inexcusable.


Well, I think she probably just mis-spoke.

With things like the collapse of the housing market and a treasury-breaking unwinnable war in Iraq and a candidate's Pastor shouting out, "God DAMN America!" I just can't get all worked up over a Representative saying "Mars" rather than "the moon," during a photo-op visit.
 



This is what I keep pointing out that Obama inspires in his followers -- and it's not without precedent in history.

This is not the kind of unifying that brings together the diverse population of a nation, this is separatist, bullying, cult-like activity that is ultimately divisive and destructive.

Booing Representative Sheila Jackson Lee and Maya Angelou because they choose to support Hillary Clinton. This is not the behavior of a unifying movement, it's intimidation -- and that's what we've seen across America and on the Internet and this forum from Obama supporters.

Giving in to intimidation tactics from a political movement brings about very grim results.

"Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it." -George Santayana


No wonder we Americans appear soft.
We're too sensitive to handle boos without running to some forum and complaining about it. Very much like Hillary (and her supporters) making herself out to be the veritable victim of the media.

Here's a tampon. Your vagina's bleeding.
 
No wonder we Americans appear soft.
We're too sensitive to handle boos without running to some forum and complaining about it. Very much like Hillary (and her supporters) making herself out to be the veritable victim of the media.

Here's a tampon. Your vagina's bleeding.

Seriously. Oh my, God. They booed her. This has got to be one of the lamest attempts at an attack I have seen posted since the start of the Primaries.
 
Re: Sheila Jackson Lee / Pathfinder gaffe

One of several US flags on Mars:

Courtesy NASA/JPL-Caltech
 
She confused the moon, where we have visited, the big round thing in the sky whose pock-marked surface we can see, with Mars, which appears as nothing more than a star in the sky. If you think a man who said "God DAMN America!" in only one verified sermon in 20 years, if his freedom of speech is so disturbing to you, then you can be just as bothered by someone who is elected to office to make educated votes about a host of decisions, some of whom are impacted by complicated scientific/medical awareness, who can't tell the difference between Mars and the moon.



I place importance on the mentor of the potential President of the United States preaching, "God DAMN America."

And I place importance on Obama's pandering and financial ties to Exelon, selling out his constituents and the lies he's told about legislation he claims to have passed but did not.



When residents in Illinois voiced outrage two years ago upon learning that the Exelon Corporation had not disclosed radioactive leaks at one of its nuclear plants, the state’s Freshmen senator, Barack Obama, took up their cause.

Mr. Obama scolded Exelon and federal regulators for inaction and introduced a bill to require all plant owners to notify state and local authorities immediately of even small leaks. He has boasted of it on the campaign trail, telling a crowd in Iowa in December that it was “the only nuclear legislation that I’ve passed.”

“I just did that last year,” he said, to murmurs of approval.

A close look at the path his legislation took tells a very different story. While he initially fought to advance his bill, even holding up a presidential nomination to try to force a hearing on it, Mr. Obama eventually rewrote it to reflect changes sought by Senate Republicans, Exelon and nuclear regulators. The new bill removed language mandating prompt reporting and simply offered guidance to regulators, whom it charged with addressing the issue of unreported leaks.

Those revisions propelled the bill through a crucial committee. But, contrary to Mr. Obama’s comments in Iowa, it ultimately died amid parliamentary wrangling in the full Senate.

“Senator Obama’s staff was sending us copies of the bill to review, and we could see it weakening with each successive draft,” said Joe Cosgrove, a park district director in Will County, Ill., where low-level radioactive runoff had turned up in groundwater. “The teeth were just taken out of it.”

The history of the bill shows Mr. Obama navigating a home-state controversy that pitted two important constituencies against each other and tested his skills as a legislative infighter. On one side were neighbors of several nuclear plants upset that low-level radioactive leaks had gone unreported for years; on the other was Exelon, the country’s largest nuclear plant operator and one of Mr. Obama’s largest sources of campaign money.

Since 2003, executives and employees of Exelon, which is based in Illinois, have contributed at least $227,000 to Mr. Obama’s campaigns for the United States Senate and for president. Two top Exelon officials, Frank M. Clark, executive vice president, and John W. Rogers Jr., a director, are among his largest fund-raisers.

Another Obama donor, John W. Rowe, chairman of Exelon, is also chairman of the Nuclear Energy Institute, the nuclear power industry’s lobbying group, based in Washington. Exelon’s support for Mr. Obama far exceeds its support for any other presidential candidate.

In addition, Mr. Obama’s chief political strategist, David Axelrod, has worked as a consultant to Exelon. A spokeswoman for Exelon said Mr. Axelrod’s company had helped an Exelon subsidiary, Commonwealth Edison, with communications strategy periodically since 2002, but had no involvement in the leak controversy or other nuclear issues. ...

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/03/u...gin&adxnnlx=1207077642-arj3oFN4Plo6c666MHu45A
 
You mean there is a history of her mis-speaking? Now I know why Clinton and her see eye to eye.
 
Re: Sheila Jackson Lee / Pathfinder gaffe

That's not the one planted by Armstrong... or any human…

I read the same Wiki article before adding my post. That’s why I substituted “Re: Sheila Jackson Lee / Pathfinder gaffe” in the title. I was just tossing something into the fray to see if anyone is paying attention. ;)
 
You mean there is a history of her mis-speaking? Now I know why Clinton and her see eye to eye.

I have noticed that the term "misspeak" IS the new "Wardrobe Malfunction".

It takes a special someone to change the way we view a term. Janet Jackson and now Hillary Clinton will forever be remembered for their contributions in defining how we view these 2 terms in the English Language.
 
Well, you usually make shit up and harp about things long since discussed and (either it or the spin you place on it is) proven wrong, but, like the Dubya-fanatics, you are in it to win it, regardless of truth or whatever, so you just keep on doing what you are doing. Your Rovian smears aren't working, your credibility is as shot as your integrity, and, with your tactics obvious, I can't imagine anyone is going to suddenly "see the light" and embrace your nonsense. You've wasted your vote, you've had your say---and you will NEVER change mine, as I will vote for Obama when my state votes next month. The only thing you should be doing is hoping someone who has learned something from studying human nature, as opposed to BushRepublicanRovianism, will come along and actually put forth a substantive discussion. How many red herrings are you going to pile on this thread YOU started and got so terribly wrong?


With all this verbal diarrhea, you've failed to post anything refuting my linked proof that Obama lied about having passed nuclear leak legislation.

You can toss all the personal insults at me you like but none of that changes Obama's lies and the destructive behavior Obama inspires.
 
Republicans already despise her, because apparently they already see through her when many of her supporters apparently are incapable of doing so ... even after the Bosnia story.

Actually a certain % of Republicans despise her because she'll reverse the Bush Court.
That's the real reason.
They might get Obama instead. It's very dicey.

Obama brings 0 military experience.
McCain might trump him on that score.

Obama might be the "Nader" all grown up.

If he had just waited 4-8 years.
Obamaites are exceedingly foolish.
They have no good judge of character.
Hillary is every bit as strong in character as Obama and stronger.
 
Guys, this thread is kind of over.;)

I think the current events threads have been done a disservice by all the people who ignore the original post topic to tell us how much they take offence or to repeat themselves ad infinitum.:rolleyes:

The can around booing has been kicked.

Now, it's just insomniacs anonymous. My name is Seamus, and I am an insomniac. I have been an insomniac for 28 years. Who's next?:wave:

(I hand out pillows and warm milk to everybody).
.
.
.
 
Guys, this thread is kind of over.;)

I think the current events threads have been done a disservice by all the people who ignore the original post topic to tell us how much they take offence or to repeat themselves ad infinitum.:rolleyes:

The can around booing has been kicked.

Now, it's just insomniacs anonymous. My name is Seamus, and I am an insomniac. I have been an insomniac for 28 years. Who's next?:wave:

(I hand out pillows and warm milk to everybody).
.
.
.


Thanks, Seamus. I thought this thread had something to do with Sheila Jackson Lee.

My only comment as a Texan although not in her district: I liked her a long time ago when she actually represented her district. Like a lot of long time politicians, she just represents herself these days....or I see her that way, at least.

Seems like ever since she changed her hairstyle to that African Do (No jab at African styles, you guys!), ever since then she lost site of her constituency.

Like a lot of those long time politicians.....it's time for her to get out.

As for the booing by Obama supporters......absolutely no surprize there.

She took a chance that Clinton would be stronger in her district and she lost that notion.
 
She took a chance that Clinton would be stronger in her district and she lost that notion.


She could have switched from Clinton to Obama, as the Obama campaign has strong-armed some other superdelegate elected officials to do, but she did not. That's the reason she was booed.
 
The reason she was booed is because she is silencing the vote of thousands, the vote of her constituency.


Like Kennedy and Kerry are silencing the vote of their constituency?

The strong arming by JJ Jr has been discussed in other threads. As Alfie used to tell you - Try and keep up.
 
She could have switched from Clinton to Obama, as the Obama campaign has strong-armed some other superdelegate elected officials to do, but she did not.

Nick even if I were to concede that the Obama campaign has strong-armed superdelegates its not as if such bahavior is beneath the Clinton campaign.

Aren't you really complaining because Obama's strong-arming is more effective than Mrs. Clinton's?


At least in your view.
 
Nick even if I were to concede that the Obama campaign has strong-armed superdelegates its not as if such bahavior is beneath the Clinton campaign.

Aren't you really complaining because Obama's strong-arming is more effective than Mrs. Clinton's?


At least in your view.


Obama's whole campaign is supposedly about changing politics, making it more positive and inclusive, getting away from the way it's been. Now you're saying it's okay if Obama does it because that's the way it's done.

We're back to another chapter of Obama: Just Words.

Strong-arming delegates and booing elected officials because they don't vote for the guy you want shows yet again that the Obama rhetoric doesn't match Obama actions.

Just words.
 
Back
Top