bankside
JUB 10k Club
Re: New York Baby Infected With Herpes After Metzitza B'peh Circumcision Rite
Speak for yourself as to what other behaviours "we accept." I assure you if a child acquired a(nother) sexually transmissible infection that proved fatal, the law would intervene. Nor does belonging to a small sect insulate parents from a normal duty of care.
If you'd care to post about all those other topics in other threads, you might get a sense of the outrage they engender. Crazy gun policy? Yeah, I think I'm on record there. Crazy social norms around lethal sexual behaviour? I do think I've put a few words down on that topic too. Pointless hypocritical unprincipled military adventurism? Done. Profit-driven insane health care system? Yup.
In fact we are as outraged by other kinds of deadly stupidity. Implying that the animus of this thread is actually some kind of anti-religious sentiment only illustrates the problem outlined by Hitchens, who said of Falwell, "you can get away with the most extraordinary offenses to morality and to truth in this country if you will just get yourself called 'reverend'"
There is no reason to give any more standing to this practice than might be given to some discredited idea authored by Dr. Spock a couple of generations ago and now known to be unsound. And no reason not to reject it as forcefully as all those other subject areas on which we do indeed weigh in.
Of course it would.
We see the OP going batshit crazy because babies are dying in a fairly small sect practicing some ancient ritual and a tiny amount of preventable deaths are occurring. The OP is outraged because the cause of death has a religious origin.
Where is the comparable data for other avoidable risk behaviors that kill innocents in much larger numbers? Where is the data comparing STD deaths that are often spread to innocent partners? Where is the outrage for DUI deaths or even violent crime that results from alcohol and substance abuse? There is a very long list of risk behaviors that create many, many more times the innocent fatalities than this rare occurrence does.
A breathalizer interrupt would pretty much end all DUI fatalities, but we don't get insane at every DUI, and we have technology to prevent those deaths.
It doesn't make the practice right, but the outrage is nothing less than a rant.
Innocent lives are the cost of many controllable behaviors, but we accept those. This is nothing more than a pet peeve about a tiny population and the damage is to their own population, not bystanders.
I don't endorse it, but this thread is lame as are the dumbass shitstorm comments made after.
Speak for yourself as to what other behaviours "we accept." I assure you if a child acquired a(nother) sexually transmissible infection that proved fatal, the law would intervene. Nor does belonging to a small sect insulate parents from a normal duty of care.
If you'd care to post about all those other topics in other threads, you might get a sense of the outrage they engender. Crazy gun policy? Yeah, I think I'm on record there. Crazy social norms around lethal sexual behaviour? I do think I've put a few words down on that topic too. Pointless hypocritical unprincipled military adventurism? Done. Profit-driven insane health care system? Yup.
In fact we are as outraged by other kinds of deadly stupidity. Implying that the animus of this thread is actually some kind of anti-religious sentiment only illustrates the problem outlined by Hitchens, who said of Falwell, "you can get away with the most extraordinary offenses to morality and to truth in this country if you will just get yourself called 'reverend'"
There is no reason to give any more standing to this practice than might be given to some discredited idea authored by Dr. Spock a couple of generations ago and now known to be unsound. And no reason not to reject it as forcefully as all those other subject areas on which we do indeed weigh in.

