The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Once Again...the World moves on without the US

rareboy

coleos patentes
50K Posts
Joined
Dec 4, 2006
Posts
118,096
Reaction score
27,778
Points
113
186 countries and the EU have signed on to the Basel Convention, aimed at controlling and reducing plastic waste.

The most notable exception.

The US.

plastic-waste-3.jpg


Canadians have become more aware of this international crisis this past month when it was revealed that nearly one hundred containers of plastic waste that were purchased by a private contractor and shipped to the Phillipines last year were, in fact, mixed garbage. After the situation was made very public by Duterte, Canada has quickly moved to have this mess removed back to our shores.

The whole 2nd and 3rd world is literally choking on 1st world garbage.

Time to put pressure on the US legislature to join the convention.

https://www.independent.co.uk/envir...z4NpxYQ9DOaXtTBBdLZOEP91fo#Echobox=1557561641
 
How about we put pressure on the manufacturers to reduce unnecessary, excess packaging. Why always hold the consumers responsible?
 
^ You answered your own question. Consumers are responsible because we keep buying over packaged goods and single use plastics and aren't putting pressure on the manufacturers.
 
^^another question that's begged :rotflmao: For example, you order another ram stick for your computer. Why do online retailers insist on packaging that stick in a hard plastic sleeve, then wrap it in inflatable plastic "bubble wrap" and then put it inside an even larger cardboard box (probably measuring in the neighborhood of 12 inches x 8 inches x 2 inches) before shipping; when a heavy duty, padded envelope not much larger than a #10 business envelope should be sufficient.
 
^^another question that's begged :rotflmao: For example, you order another ram stick for your computer. Why do online retailers insist on packaging that stick in a hard plastic sleeve, then wrap it in inflatable plastic "bubble wrap" and then put it inside an even larger cardboard box (probably measuring in the neighborhood of 12 inches x 8 inches x 2 inches) before shipping; when a heavy duty, padded envelope not much larger than a #10 business envelope should be sufficient.

It's probably cheaper to limit the customization in the shipping materials than it is to provide boxes and packaging over a huge range of specifications.
 
I say tax the manufacturers for not reducing THEIR packaging, not the people who have no choice in their packaging. Easy peasy.
 
186 countries and the EU have signed on to the Basel Convention, aimed at controlling and reducing plastic waste.

Basel Convention [Wiki]

Parties to the Basel Convention: (shown in blue)



The most notable exception [to countries that have signed on to the Basel Convention]

The US.

It appears that we are waiting on the US Congress.

The United States signed the Basel Convention in 1990 and the Senate gave its advice and consent to ratification in 1992, but before the President can ratify the treaty, implementing legislation is required. The United States supports ratification of the Convention, but to date no implementing legislation has been enacted.

Why hasn't the United States ratified the Basel Convention? (United States Environmental Protection Agency)
 
Well ya'll swallowed that carbon tax crap hook line and sinker.
 
I say tax the manufacturers for not reducing THEIR packaging, not the people who have no choice in their packaging. Easy peasy.

All one has to do is get that by the SBA, the local, state and national Chambers of Commerce, the people and/or companies that manufacturer the single use plastic bags that everyone is trying to get banned but state legislators are balking at doing so, the manufacturers of cardboard boxes, bubble wrap, shrink wrap and other packaging materials. . .but I think you can get the idea that it isn't so "easy peasy"
 
I say tax the manufacturers for not reducing THEIR packaging, not the people who have no choice in their packaging. Easy peasy.

Derrrrrrrrrrrrrr

Who do you think pays the tax in the end?
 
Back
Top