Re: Should Bert and Ernie get married on Sesame Street?
Yea why not?
If it bothers you go burn a cross for fucks sake.
Yea why not?
If it bothers you go burn a cross for fucks sake.
PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.
Good grief, they children's characters, leave them alone. Do we have to impose sexualisation into everything kids see? As they are, Ernie and Bert are friends who happen to live together in their make believe world of puppet magic.
Why not Bevis and Butthead?
Why not Bill and Ted?
Why not Laurel and Hardy?
or some other two friend combo? If there wasn't an intentional gay connotation to a pairing, why introduce it?
maybe it wasn't the right time for those characters.
now maybe it is.
why does it bug you so much?
PreTTy PeTe said:marriage is bond between two people who love each other.
Only one major flaw in the argument, StarCrasher: The Muppet didn't cater to the young kids, but the family as a whole. Sure, there were fuzzy critters, but the stars and some of the humor were not for kids. By making that mistake, it casts aspersions over your article...
I agree that there needs to be a gay couple, or at least a gay character, in Sesame Street, but the problem is how to pull it off. That is, without making the character too stereotypical (which would be the natural inclination). Also, Bert & Ernie would be the worst choice, as it would come off as forced.
RG
Sorry but this is wrong. Marriage should be between one frog and one pig.
I never actually said they were in a relationship so you typed that all out for nothing.
Look, it's real simple.
Bert and Ernie are Muppets, as are Kermit and Miss Piggy. They're both made by the same company and both cater to a mostly child audience.
So Sesame Street's statement that Muppets don't a sexual orientation is bunk.
