Post something just for the heck of it

frankfrank · Nov 24, 2018

Oh my God, this is even worse. FAR worse. Image not shown, because it depicts a minor.

http://historydaily.org/funny-ads-from-the-past-you-wont-ever-find-in-modern-times/24

[Love's Baby Soft Body Lotion]

We are against the sexualization of children in today’s world, yet this ad is screaming for a pedophile to buy this product. Admittedly, there is a certain degree of sexiness to innocence, but that definitely doesn’t apply to a five year old little girl. No matter how much make up she is wearing, how done up her hair is, and how revealing her clothing is, there is nothing sexy about a child. This young girl is dolled up to look way older than she is and the fragrance is supposed to add to her appeal so that men find her innocence to be attractive. In all, this ad seems to encourage pedophilia.

belamyi · Nov 25, 2018

frankfrank said:
Oh my God, this is even worse. FAR worse. Image not shown, because it depicts a minor.

http://historydaily.org/funny-ads-from-the-past-you-wont-ever-find-in-modern-times/24

That hand is not a young girl's: a minor might well, but definitely not a "five year old"... if the make-up and wig make her look older, it's the ad idea what makes people think of her as much younger than she was.

Anyway, that goes along the idea that made people think that all homos were pedos: it's the idea that sex is tied to the taste for the young and soft, and that if a man was ever attracted to males, those had to be boys, not men.