The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

Post something just for the heck of it

You are attempting to steer this conversation away from your aforementioned anti proletarian slur.
Conversation? what conversation? :confused:

Antiproletarian? Moi? I am the son of a proletarian.

If anything, I am antisnob. Yes, ME :cool: :mrgreen:
 
CR_1300929_328cc0ac58d144d28f739e2cb091cee4_mensaje_de_ayuda.jpg
 
1704689607547.jpeg

What amazes me is that this whole thing has been excavated -- it was entirely buried except for some bricks exposed at the top until someone found a brick with an inscription on it; he took it to an archaeologist who read it as a name and wanted to know where it came from.

They moved one heck of a lot of dirt!
 
View attachment 2331041

What amazes me is that this whole thing has been excavated -- it was entirely buried except for some bricks exposed at the top until someone found a brick with an inscription on it; he took it to an archaeologist who read it as a name and wanted to know where it came from.

They moved one heck of a lot of dirt!
The most amazing thing about it is that most of what can be seen is a late XXth-century reconstruction, and what actually was excavated and exposed behind the mock façace, is a heap of eroded dirt.
 

It doesn't specify how many bricks were employed in the restoration.

But it does certify that restoration was finished in 2016..: early 21st century, in common centurial dating.
 

It doesn't specify how many bricks were employed in the restoration.

But it does certify that restoration was finished in 2016..: early 21st century, in common centurial dating.

The restoration was the application of waterproofing sealant to the exposed bricks so they wouldn't crumble -- sun-baked bricks tend to deteriorate when buried for a long time.

Here's a close-up -- these are not modern bricks:

1704871316073.jpeg

Efforts have also been made to excavate the ancient drainage and sewer systems at the site.

Some repair efforts used concrete bricks, but these efforts actually damaged the original bricks so the modern materials have been removed. Efforts have also been made to identify the composition of the original bricks with a possible view to duplicating the ancient materials for making repairs where people have damaged the exposed structure. Some minimal work has been done utilizing bricks made in this way.
 
I know this is the ziggurat of Ur, which is much older, but, hopefully, an image will make more words unnecessary:

368460035_794250676043141_2894159627619814354_n.jpg


Even the bricks that would not be "modern bricks" are not "whole ancient bricks", with more than just "sealant" added.

You said it yourself: sun-baked bricks tend to deteriorate when buried for a long time, which do not need to be eons, and the Chogha Zanbil was buried for over 3,000 years.

It's funny how your post, more or less unawarely, tended to present my original post as some sort of negationism.
 
Back
Top