The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

Post something just for the heck of it

I never knew that zolt and pat made such a fine couple :mrgreen:


I am so glad pat has so much life outside all those silly posts about me :cool: :rolleyes:
 
^ methinks you doth protest too much. :?

BTW #929 is supposed to show a physiognomical resemblance between the dead and the living.
 
1412406769076_wps_4_Kane_Barry_and_Emma_Rowla.jpg


'Nothing Lasts Forever'. Note the serration on the neck of the person on the right who suicided after copyrighting the image.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-just-days-turning-husbands-life-support.html
 
I never knew that zolt and pat made such a fine couple :mrgreen:

I am so glad pat has so much life outside all those silly posts about me :cool: :rolleyes:

If you sawed open Pat's beating heart with a hunting knife, there you would be inside. Bloody, turtlenecked and adored, as Hanuman adores Ram and Sita:

pbaad35_ram_bhakt_hanuman.jpg

Pat and I just chat.
 
^ Of course. I was thinking you might say you have a heart of stone. Or that you had the broken blade of a hunting knife there— Cf post # 942.
 
No, I just think this isn't a picnic...

Unless suffering is the direct and immediate object of life, our existence must entirely fail of its aim.
It is absurd to look upon the enormous amount of pain that abounds everywhere in the world, and
originates in needs and necessities inseparable from life itself, as serving no purpose at all and the
result of mere chance. Each separate misfortune, as it comes, seems, no doubt, to be something exceptional;
but misfortune in general is the rule.
I know of no greater absurdity than that propounded by most systems of philosophy in declaring evil to
be negative in its character. Evil is just what is positive; it makes its own existence felt.
 
^ methinks you doth protest too much. :?

BTW #929 is supposed to show a physiognomical resemblance between the dead and the living.

"Protest"? about what?

They resemble like a potato resembles a tulip.-
 
Unless suffering is the direct and immediate object of life, our existence must entirely fail of its aim.
It is absurd to look upon the enormous amount of pain that abounds everywhere in the world, and
originates in needs and necessities inseparable from life itself, as serving no purpose at all and the
result of mere chance. Each separate misfortune, as it comes, seems, no doubt, to be something exceptional;
but misfortune in general is the rule.
I know of no greater absurdity than that propounded by most systems of philosophy in declaring evil to
be negative in its character. Evil is just what is positive; it makes its own existence felt.

It's not negativity itself what is "positive" or makes "its own existence felt": it's the connection you establish with it, like others do the same with "good". It's your own choice in focusing in one or the other, nor either of them in themselves what "force" their own presence in the world, and in you.

That leaving aside the silly question of considering anything "objectively" evil or good.
 
^ [-X Schopenhauer says Evil is positive rather than negativity being positive. :)

Whatever he calls it, he just made the simply simpleton mistake of the Platonist Western world about Good... again, that compounded with the fact that he ultimately agrees with the Goodie view, even if he just calls it "positive"ness... he is in the same trap of valoration (which is not exactly the same as "values", but that's a different matter), in which definite values are set as natural in themselves, as forcing themselves upon minds, ignoring what makes them have sense or nonsense, that is, what is important is what you choose, be it pain, mortification, pleasure (although those, which are examples taken from old philosophies, are ultimately very much the same as "good" or "evil"), and the less important, the senseless in itself, in fact, is that you CALL what you have chosen as "Evil", "Good", "positive", whatever...
 
Back
Top