The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

Presented with comment [Trans Teacher Kayla Lemieux]

Sure. That would be it.

Welcome to Canuckistan where we don't give a fuck about a unicorn story about a teacher with big fake tits. Focus on us for what is wrong with the western world.

We'll just say we're sorry.
 
Latimer said:
In Canada you risk being charged with a hate crime for stating that you believe that this wannabe woman is not fit to teach. Even stating that he is a wannabe woman with monstrously large, hard-nippled fake breasts could land you in court. Crazy and appalling in every aspect.
Click to expand...
So, what we have on this side of the international border is preferable, where one can go around advocating the murder of LGBT, and there are no repercussions for such rhetoric, is better? Hate crimes are legislated for a reason.

Of course a "T" who is M-to-F (and I don't mean Monday-to-Friday) may not be fit to teach, but it has nothing to do with gender issues. Unfit teachers exist in all gender configurations.
 
frankfrank said:
So, what we have on this side of the international border is preferable, where one can go around advocating the murder of LGBT, and there are no repercussions for such rhetoric, is better? Hate crimes are legislated for a reason.

Of course a "T" who is M-to-F (and I don't mean Monday-to-Friday) may not be fit to teach, but it has nothing to do with gender issues. Unfit teachers exist in all gender configurations.
Click to expand...

Yet, it is more than clear, to the vast majority of the public, and by no means only the hetero population, that this teacher's unfitness is DIRECTLY related to her "gender issues." In a nation that goes to extraordinary lengths to create a safe space for atypical, minority sexual identities, she has abused those protections and thrust her huge distortion of gender onto a student body that is incapable of ignoring it, accepting it, or focusing on the subject instruction.

Being a woman is never defined as wearing horrible wigs and monster breasts and harlequin makeup. Society is always local, and no community is obligated to enshrine whoredom in its school system as a role model. And it has nothing to do with morality police. There is no society on the planet that accepts this hypersexualizaiton of a leader of children in a school. If she wants to dance in a window in Amsterdam, then they would welcome her there, but not in their classrooms.

This misguided legal approach is doomed. And the intentional warping of "hate speech" to cover any dissent of a progressive view is equally foolish. It will increasingly lead to violence in Canada if she leaves citizens no alternative to being represented or even advocating for their societal views.
 
frankfrank said:
So, what we have on this side of the international border is preferable, where one can go around advocating the murder of LGBT, and there are no repercussions for such rhetoric, is better? Hate crimes are legislated for a reason.
Click to expand...

To your allegation, the U.S. does not allow hate speech with no repercussions.

Charles Manson was convicted not for enacting the Tate Bianca murders, but for inciting them.

Alex Jones was fined $1,000,000,000 for his incitement against the parents of the Sandy Hook slaughtered children.

Yes, we do define criminal speech differently. We recognize that individuals are ultimately responsible for their criminal acts, not the persons informing or misinforming them. The Nuremburg trials and all subsequent prosecutions of war crimes have been built on the premise that individuals inherently know right from wrong when it comes to murderous acts, and that they cannot eschew accountabiilty because they were misled or wanted to believe some slander against a person or group.
 
No pun intended, but a lot of the buildings in the centre of Amsterdam are certainly compact. The lavatories in bars are often upstairs or downstairs and the stairs are often narrow. It can be quite a squeeze if you're tall and, erm, solidly built.
 
Still notice that the only press coverage in Canada is in the right wing rags.

But the case appears to be headed where it belongs at some point and that is in the courts. Which is the proper place for human rights under the Charter to be addressed.
 
If the left slants the news by refusing to cover inconvenient stories, then they are as bad as the right in holding up exceptional accounts. News is news. There is no denying that this crisis in this school is a current news story about a topic that is causing deep division in society.

A conspiracy of silence is effectively censorship.
 
NotHardUp1 said:
News is news. There is no denying that this crisis in this school is a current news story about a topic that is causing deep division in society.

A conspiracy of silence is effectively censorship.
Click to expand...
It's barely even news. Human Interest? Meh. Gossip? Pretty much.

The media is just another vessel for capitalism and it's interests. In their quest for more and more money, both the left and right leaning news outlets court their viewers by pissing them off. The people can't fight the system if they're fighting each other.
 
There are better way of making a statement (and the news) than to put on a clown show and expect to be taken seriously.

Remember that guy who was protesting something or other and streaked the Academy Awards? More people remember David Niven's statement about the guy showing the world his 'shortcomings' than the guy himself.
 
Peloso said:
It's barely even news. Human Interest? Meh. Gossip? Pretty much.

The media is just another vessel for capitalism and it's interests. In their quest for more and more money, both the left and right leaning news outlets court their viewers by pissing them off. The people can't fight the system if they're fighting each other.
Click to expand...
Pretty much this.

It really isn't a crisis. It hasn't brought the school or the government to its knees...hasn't resulted in the kids in shop class running out for huge tits.

I think there's more pity than anything.

And that is why the centre media (we don't really have leftist MSM here) are pretty much ignoring it. It isn't silence. But it doesn't literally affect the whole of Canada or the whole world in the least.
 
rareboy said:
Pretty much this.

It really isn't a crisis. It hasn't brought the school or the government to its knees...hasn't resulted in the kids in shop class running out for huge tits.

I think there's more pity than anything.

And that is why the centre media (we don't really have leftist MSM here) are pretty much ignoring it. It isn't silence. But it doesn't literally affect the whole of Canada or the whole world in the least.
Click to expand...

But in fairness, the MSM DOES make the stories "newsworthy." The selection process of which stories to elevate is the very bias that the right is always carping on, and they are right. They're wrong about 99 things, but they're right about the slant ABC, NBC, CBS, PBS, NYT, WP, and their alliances propogate. Let a single-death street crime happen in NYC, and it's suddenly national news. Let thousands of them happen the same day in the MIdwest and no coverage at all.

The crisis is that a controversial law is being contested in real world circumstances, and it is a microcosm of the larger arguments surrounding the law. It is no less news than when a single Asian mugging occurs and it is amplified as "typical" of the alleged anti-Asian hate crimes, even when it is many times a purely economic crime, stealing from some old Asian who is known to pay in cash in their purchases

The MSM is terrible about telling viewers what might be and in so doing, portrays it as reality instead of supposition.

And the concern in teaching has NEVER been that any (sane) student would want to imitate, but that the educational objective is lost and the (teacher-generated) spectacle becomes the focus of everyone's attention, but most of all, the students'. Shame on her for doing that in the classroom.
 
There is a whole aspect of this story that isn't being reported that a member of my family who, with some additional info on the situation and the possible motivation of the teacher involved told me about.

Let us just say, that I have a better understanding of the backgound and the position that the board is taking and why this is a completely irrelevant story for most Canadians.

This is a case to be judged in court where the teacher's political and mercenary motivations will be examined.
 
There are several articles out there from March and April of this year announcing that the subject teacher has been seen in public multiple times sans breats, and in male attire.

Nick-Kozak-Lemieux-3-web.jpg


torontosun.com

WARMINGTON: The Kayla Lemieux show cancelled; no longer at Oakville school

It was, ironically, a picture of an Oakville teacher reportedly dressed as a man — not ones of the shop instructor clothed as a busty woman — that led to that person
torontosun.com torontosun.com

Whether this individual proves to be a simple charlatan, attempting to either exploit the policies for political gain, or more personal reasons like leave without pay, the core problem was that this, intentionally or incidentally, highlighted the paralysis of institutions when dealing with inclusion liabilities.

There can be no doubt that the constituency and the Board did not accept the presentation in the classroom of this individual, but because of law, were intimidated to deal with it appropriately at the time it appeared.

If there is a line of advocates forming to state this person doesn't represent trans people, then I'd be at the head of that line, but the hot topic is not the one-off freakish show, but the inability of the school board to intervene credibly.
 
OK, you DO realize Nebraska is not technically IN Canada, right?

It's unpopulated enough to be, and Nebraskans ARE casserole-based life forms, but they aren't Canadian, so leave them be.
 
Isn't Nebraska a state near Canada?

This woman, Machaela Cavanaugh, is obviously in a state of hysteria. She's insisting that Nebraska is a state that needs trans, needs trans, need trans.

She repeats this plea nine times.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top