The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

"Principal Outs Gay Student Couple"

Kulindahr said:
And it's that statement, reported in the press, that should sink her -- not just in this job, but permanently.
Click to expand...

I hope that the word "should" becomes "does" in this context.

However, I'm not holding my breath. ](*,)
 
With education where it is today in America, I think Principals and teachers across the nation need not to worry about the orientation of their students but worry about things such as: graduation rate, meap scores, percentage of their schools students move on to college. Since when did sexual orientaion move to the top of schools importance list?
 
Some people should be banned from associating with children. Seriously, what's wrong with kids finding young love? Educate them, don't try and monitor them like you're some sort of power-obsessed voyeur.
 
She knows that going after gay students would get her in trouble so she covers that up in an effort to prevent public displays of affection by any couple...but she doesn't want gay students in her school.What a cynical,nasty exercise.What a cynical,nasty bitch.
 
operafan said:
Truly an example of a mean-spirited, bigoted individual, and the antithesis of what an educator should be.
Click to expand...

Absolutely.

Any educator worth the first three syllables of that title knows this: everything you do, teaches.

Park your car in someone else's slot -- that's a lesson you just taught.
Ignore some school activities and favor others -- that's a lesson taught.

Act hatefully and spitefully toward certain students -- that's a lesson, too.


Students know this better than most teachers. They absorb the real lessons from their faculty without much work: cliquism, maneuvering for position, favoritism, bigotry, and so on. So what lesson(s) did this principal just teach?




I can't think of any good ones.
 
Sausy said:
She knows that going after gay students would get her in trouble so she covers that up in an effort to prevent public displays of affection by any couple...but she doesn't want gay students in her school.What a cynical,nasty exercise.What a cynical,nasty bitch.
Click to expand...

Yes -- that business about "all couples" is nothing but a CYA move, and a pretty transparent one. A good team of attorneys should be able to get her fired, blacklisted... and get the two kids their first two years of college paid for by her and her superiors.

'Cause they're culpable, too -- they were supposed to have checked her character, not just her job record, before giving that position. So either they blew it, or they agree with her.




If I lived there, I'd be SO tempted to spaghetti her lawn and grease her driveway.
 
thats fucked up.
someone needs to smack that ho. keep that bitch in lock!
 
Daemon0101 said:
"Principal Outs Gay Student Couple"
Click to expand...

The principal's contract must be reviewed and if the contract was violated the principal should be immediately terminated from the position (& possibly reassigned where they can longer cause harm to students).........there is absolutely no excuse for the principal's poor judgement and improper behavior.........
 
Footballjock9002 said:
With education where it is today in America, I think Principals and teachers across the nation need not to worry about the orientation of their students but worry about things such as: graduation rate, meap scores, percentage of their schools students move on to college. Since when did sexual orientaion move to the top of schools importance list?
Click to expand...

It's also on the very top of the lists for a lot of bigoted, reactionary churches. I have yet ever in my adult lifetime to sit in a church during a Sunday sermon, without it going into an anti-gay diatribe within 20 minutes.

This has happened only about 4 times, because anytime I run into it I don't "try church" again for 10 or 15 years, but the topic is apparently wickedly common in most churches.

As principals should worry about students' futures, churches should be much more concerned about humans as stewards of this planet, war, homicide, corruption and other "real" issue.

I would almost be willing to bet my entire life savings, sight-unseen, that this bitch piously goes to a church every Sunday, absolutely without fail, and the same kind of hatred spews regularly from that pulpit.
 
Kulindahr said:
The fact that she didn't call all the parents, just those of two gay guys, makes it pretty obvious that she wasn't interested in monitoring anyone at all -- she just wanted a cover for persecuting homosexuals. She even said so: "
Click to expand...

This just goes to show that her "agenda" wasn't for the protection and interests of her student body at all. She only wanted to use her position for her own twisted views on how wrong it is to be gay, or anything else that doesn't conform to her liking.
 
Is just me who pictures her like Imeld Stauton?

Ootp002.jpg
 
Ohiospeedo said:
Are we back in the 18th century? I just laugh at the fact they want to keep a list of couples in high school. They would have to update the list every week due to the fact high school relationships are so short lived. What a waste of time and money. I hope the principal is fired. Obviously they need someone with their priorities straight.
Click to expand...


Or maybe Berlin, 1933?
 
Now it was interesting reading the comments which were associated with the link to the news article. Obviously those supporting the school place a completely different perspective on the situation.

For me it makes straight forward hateful condemnation slightly more difficult to accept and my opinion on the event slightly more difficult to establish.

I am finding that instantaneous expressions of hatred are appearing here more frequently than before. At least in this case we are not subscribing to the punishment of her being castrated or fucked by a horse.

We are all aware of the fact that the media should be treated with intelligence and not emotion. That an opinion be made on one expressive yet unconfirmed article seems to me not to be the approach of an intelligent person to current affairs.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top