Proof that God intended for straight males to be butt fucked

[bike10]

Natures way to give pleasure to top and bottom. Play safe wrap it up and enjoy.

 

[GiacomoPisani]

sexual insemination does not equate sexuality.we are designed to inseminate another distinct sexual group,and we do pay a heavy price for this.Higher "intelligences" will have to put two dissimilar body parts in function and structure,so that insemination may occur.This is when sexuality comes into play,because not all "intelligences" will enjoy the physically induced sexual deviancy promoted by nature itself.Many "intelligences" will resort to use body parts from other sexual group as their legitimate sexual organs.

Any organs that is on a man's body constitute a sexual organ,it may or not be a reproductive organ,such as the anus or the mouth.These parts are non reproductive sexual organs.This is not the case with tits.Breasts are non reproductive SEXUAL organs only to females themselves,to males these structures have no relationship at all,with the consequence that those males who are receptive and have sensitive nerves to feel feminine body parts,have to converts those nonsexual organs into sexual organs(as if they were born to feel them as well).While the non reproductive SEXUAL body parts of those of their own sex,such as prostate,anus,etc become useless,simply because they don't have the willingness to be sexually receptive to their own sex but to another dissimilar one.

nature intended,that we as homosexuals "sodomize" and "masculinize" those females that are receptive to us,and those males that are receptive to females will be "lesbianized" and completely effeminate their nervous system by the very condition of retrieving physical sensation from non masculine structures that they weren't born with.Of course, society has created a very sophisticated way of twisting this,by using labels and behavioral controls,and now, if a man do oral sex to a female or bang a pussy,he is considered to be to be supermasculine ,but if you are not willing to be receptive and sensitive to feminine body parts ,and don't want to feel female stuffs,them you are not masculine enough.if gays don't break this programming,and expose nature's ways of causing sexual deviancy,effeminacy, vs those of society,then we will never gonna be able to break those labels.

 

[SLOPPYSECONDS]

as say

internet a wizz

 

[healingduck]

eh. it's not like it requires a throbbing dick to stimulate, you can stimulate the prostate easily enough with just a finger.

This...Not to mention that fact that it gives gay bottoms pleasure... Meh, I don't believe in that stuff anyway.

 

[rareboy]

I think the premise that some 'God' had something to do with it is idiotic.

 

[bulge]

Prostate is the power station of male sexuality and perhaps the most important part as it produces the ejac fuel. The presence of it up arse clearly makes male arse to one of the most important sexual organs in males. Moreover it is man's G-spot. Prostate massage is one of the oldest human crafts. Women don't have a clit

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=male+clitoris

but men for sure have one, easy to find and locate and readily accessible.

It is the only excitable male organ that is not hanging outside. As it sits inside within easy finger reach, it is meaned to be reached inside.

Nature is exuberant. Men make billions of spermatozoa. It is clear intermale cooling down of this exuberance is the best option for men, given by nature itself as male ass fits cock perfectly and men have an overall matching sexuality (tempo, rythm, always sexually ready,... there is nothing one guy understands better about an other guy than his sexual needs; it is obvious, it is all clear)

http://www.isbnlib.com/isbn/0312253...xuality-and-Natural-Diversity-Stonewall-Inn-E

 

[RonR18]

I'm sorry, but this sounds 100% lame from the guy who just tried to tell us we're gay because our dad didn't love us.

But hey, kudos on giving an actual poll option that works.

In regards to my other thread, you apparently have me confused with someone else. As I didn't in any way, shape, or form "try to tell anyone they're gay because their dad didn't love them." I merely expressed my opinion and invited readers to share their opinion on the issue. Perhaps you've undergone some electroll shock therapy recently that has temporarily scrambled your thought processes? If not, kudos on using this thread to damage your credibility by blatantly misrepresenting the facts.

As well, you selected the option, "No, I think your theory is full of shit, for the reasons I've listed in this thread," but yet you totally ignored your implied agreement to provide the reasons for your opinion, which further undermines your credibility. Thus, your vote technically doesn't even count. Especially since your bias is so obvious, as evidenced by your insulting characterization of this thread as being "100% lame," and your distortion of the facts regarding my other thread.

But I don't hold petty grudges, so if you're able to express your opinion without resorting to insults and making deceptive comments about my other thread, I'd love for you to come back in here and post your opinion on why you think my theory "is full of shit."

On one hand, for the most part, I figured this is just a joke.

But... if you think about it, the prostate is considered the male g-spot. And how do you get to it...? Hmmmmm mmmmm. Guessing not many straight guys get that experience, do they.... the OP certainly has posed an interesting question.
Perhaps it should be... who experiences greater sexual stimulation/orgasms... tops or bottoms.

RE: "And how do you get to it...?"

In my opinion, an erect penis is the best way to stimulate it.

RE: "the OP certainly has posed an interesting question"

Thanks, I appreciate that.

Free will. It's like the question abou why God would allow evilness to exist

Haha, a G-spot has a very specific purpose and cannot be equated with something like behavior in any sense of the word. As it would be similar to saying God/evolution gave you a sense of smell for the same reason antibiotic resistant infections are allowed to proliferate in hospitals.

nope, g-spot is a myth. I never found it or maybe i don't have one.

You've got one, your fingers just aren't long enough to reach it.

It's the PROSTATE. The prostate is inside your body primarily for urination and ejaculation. It isn't solely a pleasure zone. It just so happens that it CAN be stimulated to cause sexual pleasure, since it's part of the genitals. Women's g-spots can be stimulated through the anal wall, as well.


Anal sex isn't technically "natural", since it requires water-based or silicone-based latex lubricant, as the anus doesn't self-lubricate; it isn't physiologically a vagina. Oral sex isn't "natural", either. . .but the penis can be stimulated with the mouth. Technically, the only "natural" sex is penis-in-vagina.

Everything else humans do for pleasure is a Body Hax.

RE: "The prostate is inside your body primarily for urination and ejaculation."

That's exactly right, and it clearly doesn't need to be "the male equivalent of a woman's g-spot" to accomplish those tasks.

RE: "It isn't solely a pleasure zone. It just so happens that it CAN be stimulated to cause sexual pleasure, since it's part of the genitals."

That's exactly my point. But there's zero reason for a space daddy or evolution to add a "pleasure zone" feature to it that's equivalent to a woman's G-spot merely because it's technically considered to be a part of the genitals. After all, the scrotum is obviously a part of the genitalia, but it's in no way considered to be the male equivalent of a woman's g-spot.

Which brings me back to what 20 JUBbers have agreed with so far, "God or evolution put the male G-spot deep inside the anus because he/it intended for ALL males to be butt fucked. In other words, it's the same reason the female G-spot is located in the vagina... G-spots were put where erect penises are intended to go."

RE: "Women's g-spots can be stimulated through the anal wall, as well."

Haha, but the best way to stimulate the male G-spot to the point of orgasm is with an erect penis inserted into your anus, since the fingers of most men are too short to reach their own prostrate properly. Of course, I could be wrong about this, in that certain positions may make it feasible. But in any event, I seriously doubt that a space daddy would have had finger fucking in mind as a second form of masturbation for males, considering that jacking off is a lot more convenient.

Thus, again, logic dictates that the placement of the male G-spot inside the male anus indicates that God or evolution intended for men to fuck each other in the ass. And again, everyone agrees the female G-spot was intended to be stimulated by an erect penis, so it's counter-intuitive to think the male equivalent of the female G-spot was intended to be stimulated by anything other than an erect penis.

RE: "it isn't physiologically a vagina."

In my opinion, God/evolution didn't intend a heterosexual male's anus to be anything other than a temporary substitute for a vagina.

RE: "Technically, the only "natural" sex is penis-in-vagina."

I disagree with this 100%, as I've indicated in the opening post of this thread.

both hetero and homo sex are important for humans, that includes anal sex for straight men.

why else would we have 2 sexes? they are perfectly designed for each other in every sense.

and yes god did intend for straight males to be butt-fucked. sex is about domination, control and social bonding. that goes for straight guys as much as gay ones, often those instincts overlap.

Well said.

If there was indeed a male g-spot, homosexuality would have been a lot more popular.

Look up "male G-spot" on Google using quotation marks and you'll see 245,000 results. The male G-spot definitely exists, and all you have to do in order for me to prove it to you is bend over and spread your cheeks apart.

I'll respond to some more comments in this thread when I get time. Until then, here's a couple of videos that readers may find interesting:

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1oJ_lvkBa5s[/ame]

The below video just uses a replica of a penis, so I'm sure it doesn't violate the ban on frontal nudity in this forum, especially since it constitutes an educational video.

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tR-V9QWqRmY&NR=1[/ame]

 

[GiacomoPisani]

Nature is exuberant. Men make billions of spermatozoa. It is clear intermale cooling down of this exuberance is the best option for men, given by nature itself as male ass fits cock perfectly and men have an overall matching sexuality (tempo, rythm, always sexually ready,... there is nothing one guy understands better about an other guy than his sexual needs; it is obvious, it is all clear)

exactly bulge, i agree 100% with you,in general,any part that is internal or external on a man's body constitutes a "sexual organ",sexual organs can be either reproductive (testicles,cocks,semen) or non reproductive(mouth,anus,muscles).There are sexual organs that produce gametes and others simply don't.Even though female's body parts,such as vagina are involved in sexual reproduction,it is still a nonsexual organ to us,that is to say,to our nervous system.

Any attempt to be receptive,passive or sensitive to body parts that our nervous system can't feel and thus considers external,constitutes the real cause of sexual deviancy.That's why the real sexual deviant is the one who experience having nonsexual organs as legit sexual ones.For instance,heterosexual men,get aroused with urinary body parts,that are not even remotely similar to the one they've got. Heterosexual men tell us that the function of the anus is to "shit",nonetheless they have no objection to think that a pair of breasts, filled up with baby milk is a sexual organs.They even like to rub their cocks on them; organs that we might say, are "designed" with the sole purpose of breastfeeding,but it does seems that heterosexual men can use them to get sexual arousal.Again,with structures that are not legit sexual organs.

What happens is that breasts are women's non reproductive sexual organs,not men's.Imagine a blind men trying to be heterosexual,the poor ,he's gonna have "ghost" sexual organs and everything.Can you imagine getting arouse with an organ that your own body doesn't have a clue what is to have one? it's a nonsense, isn't it? That's the burden and the paradox that nature have created,we must reproduce by sexual contact with the one that we least belong sexually to.So if the opposite sex got "X" nonsexual organ,that they even find disgusting,you better be prepared to "feel" them too,by turning it into a fake sexual one.This is the actual psycho-physical dynamic of sexual deviancy and inversion,to be able to get aroused with body parts that your own body is not made of,and reject and be unsensitive to your real sexual organs,that on top of that, you won't be able to reproduce with.


the issue here is that nature in its exuberance,have imposed upon us,sexually deviant reproductive behaviors and conditions induced by sexual dimorphism,involving the putting together of organs without the same functions and structure.Thus,it basically created a blatant mismatch,an immoral and unacceptable asymmetry,try to rub strongly a hard 10-inch penis with a 0.9 mm clitoris,and tell me who comes out rolling their eyes and moaning like a freak.

it is extremely important for us to determine which body parts are strict men's sexual organs and which aren't,otherwise we might end up having sexual arousal with god knows what sort of exotic body parts found out-there.And worst,convincing and proving ourselves that we can get pleasure with what the opposite sexual group find disgusting or unpleasant.

 

[belamyi]

Haha, a G-spot has a very specific purpose and cannot be equated with something like behavior in any sense of the word. As it would be similar to saying God/evolution gave you a sense of smell for the same reason antibiotic resistant infections are allowed to proliferate in hospitals.

Free will to enjoy your G-spot, like you are free to be a celibate or sexually active. It's not about "it's there FOR..." or "evolution GAVE you...", it's simply there, and then you can use it or lose it, like apotemnophiliacs http://www.slate.com/id/2085402/

 

[Telstra]

Thankyou RonR18 about the video "guide to prostate massage"

but still, nah not g-spot. maybe mine is just not that sensitive.

 

[RonR18]

Thankyou RonR18 about the video "guide to prostate massage"

but still, nah not g-spot. maybe mine is just not that sensitive.

Your welcome. It's as sensitive as a female's G-spot, you just need to get a prostate massager, as your fingers are too short:

"The main problem in using the finger is that it may be too short to reach the prostate gland.

A prostate massager refers to devices for massaging the prostate gland, mainly for sexual purposes.

The shape of a prostate massager is similar to a finger, since prostate massages are traditionally given digitally. They usually have a slightly curved head to effectively massage the prostate. Lubricant is usually inserted into the anus. A prostate massager should be used with care because of the sensitivity of the prostate. Correct use involves a medium to light repetitive massage, or circular motion—the tool should not be thrusted.

Prostate massage equipment ranges from dildos to butt plugs and G-spot vibrators. When used in sexual practice, prostate massagers are commonly referred to as "prostate toys", "prostate sex toys", and "anal toys". These prostate massagers are inserted into the rectum through the anus and are intended to stimulate the prostate by simple massaging or vibrating. They are used during foreplay by many couples.

Prostate stimulation is thought to produce stronger and more powerful orgasms similar to orgasms in women produced by G-spot stimulation."

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostate_massage#cite_note-Prostate_Massage-14

"The problem with fingers is that they are usually about and inch or two too short to do the job well. It feels good, but, a finger doesn't usually reach to the top of the prostate gland and don't do an efficient job of milking the prostate gland (releasing the fluid)."

Source: http://www.prostate-massage-and-health.com/prostate-orgasm.html

 

[borg69unimatrix]

Anal sex isn't technically "natural", since it requires water-based or silicone-based latex lubricant, as the anus doesn't self-lubricate; it isn't physiologically a vagina.

Umm... I pre-cum enough that I could easily get in there if I wanted to. The anus might not self-lubricate, but *I* certainly do.

 

[Nomenclature]

If anyone actually pre-cums half a bottle's worth of lube, feel free to screw me.

 

[belamyi]

If we go for the real "natural" preparation for an ass-fuck, then we have to talk of taking advantage of the moment when your bowels have been emptied... and cleaned up and your rectum is relaxed and ready... depending of the other one's size and on your own experience.

 

[GiacomoPisani]

anal sex is like bodybuilding,they don't have to be "natural" to be good and healthy.

 

[figjam]

If God didn't intend for straight males to be fucked in the ass, why in the hell did he put the male G-spot deep inside their anus? Personally, I believe he did it so they could fuck each other while their women were having periods. What do you think? (If you don't believe in a supreme being, just substitute "evolution" for "God.")

In case the poll question is confusing, I'm clarifying it as follows:

If you answer yes in the poll, it means you're agreeing that God or evolution put the male G-spot deep inside the anus because he/it intended for ALL males to be butt fucked. In other words, it's the same reason the female G-spot is located in the vagina... G-spots were put where erect penises are intended to go.

You try too hard...

 

[belamyi]

You try too hard...

He has no lube.

 

[asu1117]

The prostate's primary use is not sexual stimulation and just as easily one could say what you're saying for any other body part that someone gets sexual stimulation out of...



I realized how laughable this is when you started referring to God as "Space Daddy".




You say things like that then want to be taken seriously? Your theory is absolute rubbish and has no real validity.




Not to mention that your initial proposal a complete contradiction. "Straight men are meant to be fucked in the ass". Last I heard, straight men are not attracted to males, which means they aren't aroused by a penis. So unless you meant fucked in the ass by woman with a strap on... Why would someone be "meant" to do something they do not find arousing? It doesn't make any sense.




This seems like another desperate attempt to make it as if more men should be homosexual than heterosexual. Guess what, they're not. Gay men are a vast minority, maybe if it were the other way around this argument would be a little more convincing, but that isn't the case.

 

[GiacomoPisani]

the primary use of breasts is for breastfeeding,not for people who weren't born with them to use them as sexual organs,only lesbians can.
The primary function of vaginal secretion is to release gametes for copulation,not for eating pussy by people who weren't born without vagina.Only those who were born with clitoris,vulva,vaginas can say that these body parts are sexual organs,if you weren't born with any of those body parts,and you enjoy getting sexual stimulation with them,you are simply trying to do something worst than actually stimulating a REAL sexual organ such as the prostate,which is found in your own body and in those who REALLY share the same parts with you.Having fake sexual organs are one of the best skills heterosexuals learn very early during their childhood in their race for manhood.if they is someone who can get aroused with organs that are not even found in his own body,that person has be really deluded, to say the least.

bisexuals.... ,bisexuals.....,bisexuals........,bisexuals...........!!!

 

[01solara]

Butt only 10% (or less) of men are said to be gay, and probably only 60% of them are bottoms. So why would someone/something as smart as God/evolution position a female type G-spot deep inside the anus of 100% of men if only 6% of them were intended to have any practical use for it?

Same reason as tits on a bore hog. Who knows???