Protest. Protest, America!

[gsdx]

JUB’s search function isn’t great, but it works.

There's a way to get Google to search JUB for any quoted text, but I'll be damned if I remember how to do it. One of the mods posted it in one of the threads in Hot Topics a few months ago.

 

[Benvolio]

JUB’s search function isn’t great, but it works. The following quotes are not comprehensive, but perhaps lend credibility to the idea that you have distinguished between white Americans and non-white Americans (or non-white immigrants) in unflattering ways.


December 1st, 2015


December 15th, 2015


January 7th, 2016


January 8th, 2016

I have always decried abortion in general and the dishonest Roe v Wade decision, and have often given the estimated total, including non whites. In the above quotes, I was discussing the democrat plan to destroy white majority and the part which its promotion of abortion plays. But I have never limited my criticism to whites nor ever used the words white babies.

 

[SaskGuy]

There's a way to get Google to search JUB for any quoted text, but I'll be damned if I remember how to do it. One of the mods posted it in one of the threads in Hot Topics a few months ago.

site:justusboys.com

 

[Kulindahr]

It only takes one person to make a swaztika. It is a gross logical fallacy to assume that it represents a lot of people. Liberals want to believe that all Republicans are bad so they welcome a swaztika as confirming their own hatred. The swaztika could just as easily have been made by a liberal wishing to create false evidence. It happens frequently.

Well, yes, it happens.

Like, I think you're an extreme liberal whose job is to make the right look utterly foolish. I hope the pay is good.

 

[Kulindahr]

The mentality is there. It is clear. It is show and it is spoken. You don't have to see thousands of Swastikas to know that there are others when you see one. You don't have to see thousands of white sheets and hoods to know that there are others when you see one.

Free speech in the US makes it permissible to let everyone know who and what you are. You don't have to hide.

It is illogical (and, if I may, rather ridiculous) to say that one Swastika doesn't mean there are others. You're fooling only yourself to think otherwise. You're certainly not fooling anyone else.

Yep. Sociologically, if one person is willing to vandalize property by painting a swastika on it, there are fifty more wishing they could be don't quite have the guts, and two hundred more who are cheering for them.

 

[Kulindahr]

Of course you say that. No racist admits it. Do you object to the intentional destruction of the white majority or do you approve of it?

Anyone who believes in human dignity should welcome whites becoming just another minority, albeit the largest, in this country -- it reduces the operation of the inherited and institutional racism built by the long-time white majority.

 

[Kulindahr]

Protest the election and America is no better than China, Russia or North Korea. Democracy prevailed (until someone figures out how to skirt around it). Deal with it.

Um, no, in North Korea all the protestors would be rounded up and hung or shot.

And no, democracy didn't prevail, the Republic did. The states are still states, not mere provinces.

 

[Kulindahr]

But it is a democracy in which the loser won... again.

No, the winner won (technically, will win if the rules are followed, because no actual vote for president has taken place). The people do not elect the president, the states do, because this is a federated republic, not a democracy. The votes of the people are not actually votes for president, but votes to choose who then electors of their state will cast the real votes for.

 

[Kulindahr]

50.1% of voting Americans beg to differ.

???

No one got 50.1% of the vote -- no candidate got a majority.

And that, BTW, is one of the problems in the U.S. if we want to talk about "majority rule": it's possible, and common, to win an office with a minority of the vote. If one wants majority rule, we'd have to now hold a run-off between the candidates with the most votes.

 

[Kulindahr]

And smashing peoples cars and widows is unacceptable. The protesters are turning violent.

Causing criminal activity towards people's cars and trashing things has nothing to do with Trump being elected as President. They just want to take to the streets to stir trouble.

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.rt.com/document/58257daac46188457a8b4573/amp

According to ABC News tonight, it isn't the protestors who are turning violent, it's the protestors being replaced by people who get violent -- apparently anarchists quite frequently.

 

[Kulindahr]

The difference between protest/demonstration/riot is largely semantic and subjective.

Only to a Yale lawyer, trained in saying that words mean whatever favors his position.

You engage in such games so often it just reinforces my conclusion that you're a liberal paid to come here and make the right look really, really bad.

 

[Kulindahr]

Much that the democrats are doing now would have to be called rioting. http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/11/1...rump-demonstrators-damage-cars-buildings.html
http://www.infowars.com/video-high-...ne of those instances is in Portland, Oregon.

 

[Kulindahr]

It would have been nice if they burned a garbage can or two or smashed some windows...but the truth is..they were as bad as their leader. When asked WHY they let six million people burn in their backyard...the collective answer..."we didn't know"....

"We didn't give a shit"... or ..."We were happy about it"....that would have been the right answer.

I would have taken every one of the people who said that they didn't know and rid humanity of them at that moment. They all co-signed it. They turned on their neighbors and friends...they knew exactly what was happening.....
.

Actually research is showing that most of the Germans didn't know. The big extermination camps weren't in Germany, after all, they were built in Poland -- precisely because it could be done there without the German people seeing it. The camps in Germany tended to be labor camps -- where, admittedly, the approach was to work the "inmates" to death rather than just executing them.

 

[Kulindahr]

It's hilarious how rabid racists hide their flag.
Although I get the feeling if racism becomes 'acceptable' under the current political establishment, certain people will start outright saying the most incredibly vile and cruel things.

It's already happening -- at some schools in Oregon, minorities are being humiliated and abused (for example, a girl whose parents were born here, not just her, was told by a chanting group to "Go back to Mexico").

The nice thing is that a lot of other students are protesting such behavior.

 

[Kabluey]

Actually research is showing that most of the Germans didn't know. The big extermination camps weren't in Germany, after all, they were built in Poland -- precisely because it could be done there without the German people seeing it. The camps in Germany tended to be labor camps -- where, admittedly, the approach was to work the "inmates" to death rather than just executing them.

Hitler wasn't a grand enforcer. He weaseled and lied, soothsaying that the death camps were holiday and holding camps. The first camps were even constructed to loosely resemble university dorms and public housing. Don't mind the strange black smoke at the entrance...

It was all an open lie. Nothing brave or murderous like those who bizarrely worship him, sneaky and underhand and conniving. That's real evil.

 

[gsdx]

No, the winner won (technically, will win if the rules are followed, because no actual vote for president has taken place). The people do not elect the president, the states do, because this is a federated republic, not a democracy. The votes of the people are not actually votes for president, but votes to choose who then electors of their state will cast the real votes for.

And that's the Electoral College? Far too confusing so early in the morning without even a cup of coffee in front of me yet.

Rochambeau would be an easier system, don't you think?

 

[london12]

At every stage of his campaign, the vile and vulgar rhetoric of Trump has been laughed at, condoned, and excused under the assumption that he could not possibly be elected as president. We Americans are now faced with the reality of a dictator- elect, and still we are told to be ‘’open minded’’ and ‘’give him a chance’’ despite his known agenda to dismantle civil rights and to create a police state. I applaud those who are demonstrating against this unmitigated blackguard. Trump and his family reminds me of Czar Nicholas II, and I would not be surprised if they met the same fate.

checks and balances. Yes, Congress is slanted towards Trump for the first time since 1928 but it doesn't mean everybody is going to vote on whatever he does.

 

[heir-to-the-wind]

checks and balances. Yes, Congress is slanted towards Trump for the first time since 1928 but it doesn't mean everybody is going to vote on whatever he does.

Congress will find some reason to impeach him if he opposes the Republican ideologues. Pence is a malleablle nebbish

 

[Benvolio]

checks and balances. Yes, Congress is slanted towards Trump for the first time since 1928 but it doesn't mean everybody is going to vote on whatever he does.

Supporters of executive-action Obama calling Trump, a dictator before taking office is bizarre lunacy.

 

[heir-to-the-wind]

President Cheeto will will issue more EOs because he has no patience for the legislative process. Like a Russian czar, he will rule by ukase.