The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

question about Statutory rape?

1preppyjock

Porn Star
Banned
Joined
Feb 19, 2006
Posts
432
Reaction score
4
Points
0
i didn't do any of this, i am just curious.

so here are my questions.

1. suppose that a bottom adult had anal sex done by an underage guy, can that adult be charged for this? after all, the bottom was the one who got "raped".

2. if a guy got sucked by an underage guy, can the adult be charged for this crime, too? What if they just jerked off together, can that be called statutory rape, too?

i think that i already knew the answer, but that just seems a little absurd.
 
your logic is flawed

just because someone is the one who was penetrated, doesn't make them innocent of a crime- using that logic is the same as saying a woman cannot rape a man, because he is the one penetrating her (discounting anal penetration with a strap-on or such)

legally, the adult in the situation is still guilty of statutory rape, regardless of who did the penetrating

also, i think for your second question it would be something akin to 'contributing to the deliquency of a minor' or something along those lines. i'm not sure what terms would actually be used, but yes i'm sure they could be charged with something
 
1. Yes.

2. OH YEAH.

Coming from personal experience, don't let an older guy take advantage of you before you're 18.

Oh wait, you're the older guy.

K nevermind.

STAY AWAY FROM UNDERAGE GUYS UNLESS YOU WANT A MISDEMEANOR SEX OFFENSE ON YOUR RECORD FOREVER AND THE LIFETIME STATUS, "REGISTERED SEX OFFENDER"
 
you can't get statutory raped by a minor if you are an older guy.

but yeah in situations where it's real non-consensual rape, I don't think they would charge you for not being strong enough to defend yourself.
 
1. Of course, it's certainly possible. A man could easily force-feed the child viagra and then force sex at gunpoint or something.

2. This is even easier, the man just has to threaten a child at gunpoint to perform the oral sex.
 
you can't get statutory raped by a minor.

but yeah in situations where it's real non-consensual rape, I don't think they would charge you for not being strong enough to defend yourself.

you can get statutory raped by a minor if you're a minor too. both can be charged.
 
What if you were raped by a minor?

Cause that happens all the time, lol. I was surprised though that the poster thought if the minor had sex with him than isn't the minor at fault. Strange way of thinking. Than you would have to say that all those minors that were fucking their female teachers you see on the news brought it on themselves.
 
you can get statutory raped by a minor if you're a minor too. both can be charged.

OH. I thought you meant, an older guy getting statutory raped (which doesn't make sense)

yeah of course, the difference is three years, ie 17 yr old has sex with 14 year old.

17 year old gets busted for stat rape.
 
Just stick with anyone concurrently above legal age and out of high school.
 
ya, i can understand it, but i think that it is ridiculous if a bottom guy got charged for being penetrated by a minor.
 
ridiculousness of the situation aside, the legality is pretty clear

legally a minor can't consent to sex, so the adult can be charged
 
First of all, to be clear, statutory rape differs from forcible rape in that sex is not forced upon the person who is penetrated.

Secondly, even if the minor was the one who did the penetration, the older person can still be convicted of "corruption of a minor," "carnal knowledge of a minor," or "unlawful carnal knowledge." It doesn't matter whose dick is in who - the older person is can still be found guilty of "corruption of the minor."
 
ya, i can understand it, but i think that it is ridiculous if a bottom guy got charged for being penetrated by a minor.

yeah .. because you so often get "accidentally" penetrated by a minor. :roll:
if you have a sex with a minor you are breaking the law.
the fact that you just try to excuse that should give you a lot to think about ..

next you probably will start to tell us that if a adult woman missuses a child it cannot be rape .. what he heck is going on in your mind?
 
my 2 cents...

stay away from minors...period. regardless of who does what, any sexual interaction with a minor will end you up in a boat load of trouble. if you are gay, and the minor is a boy, god help you. the homophobics will go after you hard.

just avoid anykind of interaction that would put you in a compromising situation, actually just avoid minors period. if you can't, you might have a problem and should seek counseling. go find someone your own age (assuming you are an adult).
 
Back
Top