The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Republicans don't care about 9/11 responders

News flash: Republicans don't care about anyone who isn't rich, white, male, straight, and Christian.
 
T-Rexx said:
News flash: Republicans don't care about anyone who isn't rich, white, male, straight, and Christian.
Click to expand...

You also forgot fetus. After the fetus is born, then they couldn't give a shit about it. It would be great if they cared as much for life as they do unborn life.
 
MoltenRock III said:
Meh. You support every other Republican wingnut agenda item. And NOW you're upset? LMAO! Give me a break. Australia (nor Singapore) wants you.
Click to expand...

Have to say...

This pretty much sums up my feelings.

I don't see any outrage on the other issues, including DADT.

...and please don't decide to move to Canada either.
 
MoltenRock III said:
Meh. You support every other Republican wingnut agenda item. And NOW you're upset? LMAO! Give me a break. Australia (nor Singapore) wants you.
Click to expand...

Generalizing is nice right? I'm a moderate, I support things which benifit me. Anyways I've supported 1 republican-esk thing on this board and thats basically socialization of medicine and personally I favor a reform of the system. But again I like how not agreeing with you on 1 thing = agreeing with every republican agenda item. That's very affective thinking.
 
rareboy said:
Have to say...

This pretty much sums up my feelings.

I don't see any outrage on the other issues, including DADT.

...and please don't decide to move to Canada either.
Click to expand...

Sorry I told you I don't like your frozen wasteland. So you don't have to worry about me ending up on your side of the Tundra ;). Anyways DADT I'm against it, but that topic is already won ( Pragmatist can step back). But like I said there are plenty of issues that republicans are for that I'm strictly against. In the sameway that I think many of the things democrats have no stones these days.

Anyways your ingroup v.s outgroup views are very heuristic. Just because I don't agree with everything you believe is right doesn't mean I don't agree with anything.
 
Republicans have been doing this for two years.... childishly blocking every single fucking thing they can... they don't give a shit what it is..

It's all so they can claim the president hasn't done anything.

Republicans don't care about anyone but themselves. Just a bunch of greedy opportunists and Nazis.

Not like this is much worse than most of the shit they've pulled in the last couple of years. But hopefully this one will wake people up to what a bunch of slimebags you can find on the right.
 
So much for the party of Compassion. Compassion for the rich and powerful.

Thanks to voters in 2010 giving control of the House to GOP.
 
Unclean said:
Eric Cantor isn't Christian.
(And I was going to say Sarah Palin isn't male -- but you specifically said Republicans, you didn't say conservatives. Seems most of the Republican establishment don't like Palin.)
Click to expand...

Palin isn't conservative, either. In fact most of the Republicans in Congress, especially the new batch, aren't conservative -- they're reactionary.
 
Serenx55 said:
I'm a moderate, I support things which benifit me.
Click to expand...

Right there is what is wrong with America. It's why Congress is so corrupt -- they vote for things that benefit them. It's why for-profit mega-corporations have so much power -- they buy politicians who vote for what benefits them.

I rarely vote for things that will benefit me. When I do, it's because it's what's right, not because it would benefit me. I've voted against a lot of thins that would benefit me, because they weren't the right thing to do.

Supporting things that benefit you doesn't make you a moderate, it makes you a plunderer.
 
Unclean said:
You misinterpreted my comment.
Conservatives like Palin.

(Republicans/conservatives don't care about anyone who isn't rich, white, male, straight, and Christian.
Unless they are an unborn fetus.)
Click to expand...

I would think most conservatives don't like Palin, because they're not really into reactionary bigots. Though it's hard to tell; the Republicans keep their few conservatives in a pen these days and only let them out to vote.
 
Kulindahr said:
Right there is what is wrong with America. It's why Congress is so corrupt -- they vote for things that benefit them. It's why for-profit mega-corporations have so much power -- they buy politicians who vote for what benefits them.

I rarely vote for things that will benefit me. When I do, it's because it's what's right, not because it would benefit me. I've voted against a lot of thins that would benefit me, because they weren't the right thing to do.

Supporting things that benefit you doesn't make you a moderate, it makes you a plunderer.
Click to expand...

Welcome to the most individualistic culture on the world. But anyways what's right for you may not always be right for me eh?
 
Serenx55 said:
Welcome to the most individualistic culture on the world. But anyways what's right for you may not always be right for me eh?
Click to expand...

true, and opinions always change when faced with a trigger, a handful of Franklins, popularity, and public support.
 
Kulindahr said:
Right there is what is wrong with America. It's why Congress is so corrupt -- they vote for things that benefit them. It's why for-profit mega-corporations have so much power -- they buy politicians who vote for what benefits them.

I rarely vote for things that will benefit me. When I do, it's because it's what's right, not because it would benefit me. I've voted against a lot of thins that would benefit me, because they weren't the right thing to do.

Supporting things that benefit you doesn't make you a moderate, it makes you a plunderer.
Click to expand...

Yup. Agreed!

For example, I hear so fucking often, from suburbanites in America that they don't use mass transit so why should they vote for it. Then when you point out that their commute is shorter because 15% to 30% of commuters DO take mass transit, and that if it was eliminated, they'd be on the roads alongside them with HUGE delays in getting to work. But due to their wingnut cognitive dissonance they refuse to admit that they benefit not only indirectly, but frankly directly from the US Federal govt.

Asshats like this can't be reasoned with, hence why they need to be deported to North Korea.
 
MoltenRock III said:
Yup. Agreed!

For example, I hear so fucking often, from suburbanites in America that they don't use mass transit so why should they vote for it. Then when you point out that their commute is shorter because 15% to 30% of commuters DO take mass transit, and that if it was eliminated, they'd be on the roads alongside them with HUGE delays in getting to work. But due to their wingnut cognitive dissonance they refuse to admit that they benefit not only indirectly, but frankly directly from the US Federal govt.

Asshats like this can't be reasoned with, hence why they need to be deported to North Korea.
Click to expand...

With that argument, I just ask them if they'd like to start paying the actual cost of roads -- and the cost of what it would take to build enough roads to handle the traffic they'd rather have be cars.

But the more common argument against mass transit is that it isn't cost effective. That's a good argument -- except that the subsidy per passenger on the mass transit tends to be less than the subsidy per passenger in private, non-commercial vehicles. The difference is that we see the subsidy for the mass transit passengers; the subsidy for the roads is hidden.

And to me that's an argument for cutting roads loose from the government like mass transit is, where it can ask for money to run but is supposed to do its best without that. The result would be that everyone would hear about the figures it actually takes to run our roads, even in their crappy condition. So when the director of the regional highway authority had to ask the regional governmental council for an extra $500 per car for the next operating year, just to keep the roads from getting worse, it would be on TV -- just like the subsidies for the mass transit.
 
Asshats like this can't be reasoned with, hence why they need to be deported to North Korea.


Spoken like a true communist. Your comrades will be proud!
 
the repubs r saying until tax cuts are extended .........

nothing comes up

sorta principled

sorta lame

i think it's the latter ......... in this case

given what the issue is
 
Republicans care about no one but themselves and their rich friends.. the sooner this country realizes this, the better.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top