T-Rexx
JUB Addict
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2009
- Posts
- 6,026
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Rexx do you feel he did a Stellar job when he debated Hillary? I thought she chewed him up and spit him out...She trained him to do battle with the old Man...
I thought they were both somewhat poor. But that assessment is in comparison to each other, not any of the Republicans.
Republicans don't argue on the basis of facts, evidence, reason, or scholarship. Because I value these things personally, the Republican debates always seem absurd to me.
in fairness, that classmate knew high school-aged Romney versus Harvard Law School student Obama... I'd expect any Harvard Law student to smoke a high schooler![]()
I disagree.
What Barthwell was commenting on was Romney's ordinariness in comparison to Obama's brilliance. I already knew in high school which of my classmates would be successful in life, and which would fail. And I knew precisely why each would succeed or fail (e.g., family money vs. innate ability vs. some character flaw). And I was absolutely correct, in every case.
But whereas Obama struck Barthwell as "brilliant" at Harvard... ...he recalled Romney's years at Cranbrook as nothing to write home about. "Mitt was not particularly popular. He was very, very ordinary."
Barthwell is saying that Romney was an average thug who went on to guaranteed success in life because of his family's money. Obama is a brilliant man who succeeded by virtue of his ability and rose above his ordinary circumstance by force of talent. Barthwell's observations may be wrong, but his assessment of the men seems insightful.
I think the debates will be interesting... Romney was a mess in 2008, but I thought he fared reasonably well in the 2012 GOP debates once he started taking them seriously (and got some good debate prep)
As I remarked above, Republican debates (and Republican candidates in mixed debates) just don't impress me. Their arguments are not persuasive to someone who thinks as I do. (E.g., a 3,000 year old fragment of text seems to say that God hates homosexuals, so that means we should pass a constitutional amendment to prevent them from marrying.
I realize I may be in the minority in this, but I just don't find arguments absent of logic very interesting.
we will see won't we
I don't know Sidney but he's entitled to his opinion
He also said that Mittens was not anti-gay
You seem to be implying that your candidate IS anti-gay, which he claims not to be.
Do you think your candidate is lying?
























