The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Rush Limbaugh on Jindal response

Q: What's the difference between Rush Limbaugh and the Hindenburg?

A: One's a flaming nazi gasbag and the other's a blimp.
 
Gie yerself peace. Are you actualy jumping to the deffence of this repugnant piece of nazi shit?


Nope.

If you've come to that conclusion from reading my posts then you didn't understand what you read.
 
This is sad even for the GOP.

Jindal is the Manchurian Candidate, and the GOP is the deranged mother in tow with the Communist powers to overthrow the government. For Mr. Rhodes Scholar, Jindal, to agree to play the savior part for the GOP as a challenge to the popularity and new direction of President Obama is a laughably transparent scheme by the Republicans to slap some fresh paint on old ideas in the pitiful vein of resurrecting their failed policies and misguided values. Jindal's ideology is so backward you have to look at it with a mirror to make sense (that which can be had) of it. Back to the point of such a intelligent guy being the propped up wonder boy...for a party desperate for the power they squandered over eight years of nearly destroying this country. Some people just don't know when to bow out gracefully with what dignity they have left.
 
My purpose was not so much to dismiss Jindal as a potential candidate (which I'm not) but to point out how rudderless the Republicans seem to be. The country needs a strong opposition party but not one lead by the likes of a Rush Limbaugh or Sean Hannity. Mary Matalin is an acknowledged leader in the GOP. To have her call this a mini-crisis and compounding it by looking to Rush for direction is IMO pitiful!

Getting Jindal to lead could be a problem..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bobby_Jindal#External_links


According to family lore, Jindal chose to re-name himself "Bobby" inspired by the sitcom character Bobby Brady after watching The Brady Bunch television series at the age of four. He has been known by his self-adopted nickname ever since—as a civil servant, politician, student, and writer—though legally his name remains Piyush Jindal.

Jindal was born and raised a Hindu, but converted to Catholicism in high school.

Having Bobby Brady running for Pres could be a problem. Also him being hindu before changing to Catholicism is certainly something that one of those repugs would liken to muslim.
Just saying.:kiss:
 
Lots of people smoke every day, too.

Doesn't make them less stupid for doing so.


How is that remotely relevant to a very popular political radio host and the influence he has over the opinions of a lot of listeners who will vote on Election Day?
 
Jindal is probably the only politician that I think can go toe to toe with Obama intellectually

Are you joking???????????

It is like watching Kenneth the page from 30 Rock up against someone who actually thinks before he makes a speech.

Jandal is a joke. Pure and simple.

And as soon as the GOP has made their point about being 'diverse', he's history.
 
It isn't completely irrelevant.

I was merely making the point that just because a lot of people do something, it doesn't make them better for doing so...in some cases, as in smoking or listening to a lying bigoted gasbag hatemonger as he cowers behind his "It's just entertainment!" shield, it makes them demonstrably less healthy. In some cases, it harms their physical health. In others, mental functionality suffers.


Can't agree that listening to Limbaugh makes anyone "demonstrably less healthy."

But I do think Rush leads people in a direction that's not good for our country. And my point is he has influence over a great many voters and therefore it's foolish for Democrats to dismiss him as "dead" just because Republicans are out of power. In fact people like Limbaugh tend to be more powerful as opposition.
 
"I think when Obama prays, he prays to himself", says Mr. Limbaugh.

Then, in the next breath calls the media 'mean spirited'. :rolleyes:

Take a good long look in the mirror, Rush.

What a hypocritical, potentially dangerous asshole that man is....
 
How can any politician reject the need for funding for volcano protection, but at the same time accept funding for Hurricane relief? Both are potential localized disasters, so how can one in either location claim one is less important than the other? I'm sure if Louisiana had an active volcano, he would have a different stance on the issue.

Oh, I brought up the volcano thing obviously because Rush reminds me of a volcano. Spouts alot of hot air and gas, a danger to society, and is only interesting as a spectacle.
 
Democrats make a big mistake if they think Limbaugh is "dead." He's a powerful voice that a lot of people listen to every day.

Yeah, it was said that Democrats were making a big mistake taking on Sarah Palin.
How did that work out?

And all those people that listen to Rush are not enough to win elections. It's time for the Republicans to re-invent themselves.
 
If the link you provided was from a more moderate news source I'd say there's something to discuss, but seeing as it's the NY Times, one of the most liberal papers in the US, there's no talking points.

Find a similar article from a less polarized news source and then we can talk. :)

It's not just liberals who were attacking Jindal.
Somewhere, Sarah Palin is smiling.
 
I have to agree with you, Nick. Obama's first televised address to the nation was a little awkward. He pauses way too much, most likely not to have a clear thought but because he's trying too hard to chose his words very carefully. In the process he comes off a bit hesitant, and dare I say, unprepared. His teleprompter speeches are just the opposite - he comes off intelligent, articulate, inspirational and commanding.


There's nothing wrong with a man who thinks before he speaks.
We don't need any more "fool me once" gaffes from any President.
 
Two posts in this thread and in both the criticism of Rush Limbaugh is that he's fat.

Personal ridicule, that's what Obama Democrats know and use.

Shallow style over substance.

That's been the case since early in the primaries and apparently will continue to be.

And it's pretty funny in this case because that's what Limbaugh is railing about in that clip.

Limbaugh is a fucker and a fat one at that.
I like how he's demanding all Republicans to go along with Jindal or keep their mouths shut. That's the problem with the GOP: go along with anybody as long as they have an R behind their name.
Jindal virtually said the government had nothing to do with rebuilding in Louisiana, when in fact that government has pumped billions of federal dollars into that state.
If he has such a problem with government, why the fuck is he seeking to be the head of it?
 
Who even listens to Rush Limbaugh? He's precisely what's wrong with this country and the far right in general. He's such an embarrassment. I think he thinks he still lives in the 1960's.

As for Jindal, I have my strong doubts that he'll even be relevant as a possible candidate by 2012, especially after seeing how little charisma he has. He comes off like a slime ball, and his skin isn't fair enough for many white conservatives to throw their support behind him, let's just be honest about that.


I agree 110%. I want to pull for Jindal against the other GOPers, but I know they're gonna do to him what they tried to do with Obama. Have you seen Jindal's real name? That's gonna be a problem for a lot of the Southern ilk, and Palin and her patsies will jump at the chance to exploit it.
Yeah, I know it's shallow, but it's true.


The Republican Party is fast becoming (or perhaps has already become) such an ill-fit for an ever changing America. Back when it was mostly small town whites who barely knew anything beyond their own culture, values, and lifestyles who did most of the voting, conservatism ruled. But things are changing, and not in a way that will be favorable to the right. Unless of course they change as well. But they won't. Conservatism is always at odds with change and evolution.

Yeah, there's no such thing as a conservative hero. For all their barbs about Obama being "The One" and the "Messiah", they seemed to forget that messiahs tend to usher in a great deal of change.
 
Thanks for the thread, smelter.

I won't be bothering to play the video. I am in no mood to listen to Rush Limbaugh or any other radio "personality" on a Republican Talking Points program.

With our current president, Barack Obama, we've made the second consecutive political party switch going from Republican to Democratic via a fucked-up economy. So, believe me, I have no regard for anything from Mr. Limbaugh.
 
However appalling Limbaugh is, he does serve a purpose. Through him and others of his ilk, we see the true nature of the GOP. We need to know what we're up against. "Know thine enemy."

Americans who listen to and agree with his opinions already subscribe to those opinions, no matter how misguided or hateful. These people cannot be desuaded. There are non-soluble extremists on both(many) ends of our political spectrum.

Elections are won by the moderates: Americans that have the intellect or motivation to see past all the bullshit to make an informed decision.

Jindal was an attempt at "...wearing sheeps' clothing." The message was all "Wolf". This is the GOP's "new" strategy. Full-out unabashed deception.

I forget, who uses deception, fear, greed, hatred, hypocracy, ignorance, division, and derision as the means tools to an end?

You Betcha!:wink::-<
 
I forget, who uses deception, fear, greed, hatred, hypocracy, ignorance, division, and derision as tools to an end?


People of both parties do.

Also there are people in both parties who strive to be honest and responsible.
 
Back
Top