Stardreamer
auribus teneo lupum
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2010
- Posts
- 5,044
- Reaction score
- 8
- Points
- 38
- Location
- Over the Hedge and Under the Hill
Re: Senate DADT vote likely on Saturday
That is not entirely correct, Ted Olsen and ABC had this to say on the subject:
Nothing prevents the President from saying to the Justice Dept. "I agree with the court that this is unconstitutional and if there is a defense it should only be a token one to ensure the forms are followed.
The executive branch does not get to choose which laws it likes. If they did it would set a dangerous precedent. That action had absolutely no relation to Obama's desire to see the policy repealed.
That is not entirely correct, Ted Olsen and ABC had this to say on the subject:
"I don't know what is going through the [Obama] administration's thought process on 'don't ask, don't tell,'" Olson said. "It would be appropriate for them to say 'the law has been deemed unconstitutional, we are not going to seek further review of that.'"
No statutory or constitutional provision requires the Department of Justice to appeal a ruling striking down a federal law as unconstitutional. But the executive branch has traditionally continued legal defense when "a reasonable argument can be made in [the law's] support," according to DOJ guidelines.
The policy is designed to honor the spirit of the independent branches of government: Congress passes laws, presidents sign them, and only courts can ultimately decide whether or not they are constitutional.
Nothing prevents the President from saying to the Justice Dept. "I agree with the court that this is unconstitutional and if there is a defense it should only be a token one to ensure the forms are followed.












..















